Комментарии:
The sepaaration in between notes is moe crela and definitly snooth as well the general armony. The notes are more clear and fascinatin as we go on, as well the armics on armic sharp and bass zones are clearly defined as we go on on better instruments.
ОтветитьYou are an artist. We are blessed to be able to hear you and your art
Ответить1st cello sounded good, the 2nd one was just so much bigger sounding, much more tone. The last one was more of the same, but it seemed like the body of the instrument was more inert, giving a purer tone… IMHO
ОтветитьThank you for sharing this!
ОтветитьI could definitely hear a difference in each one. The first one compared to the second had a more ‘harsh’ sound; the notes of the second one ‘melted’ together. The last one was even more so. Absolutely all were beautiful with you playing! I would be interested in looking at the height of the strings on each one and even doing a comparison of each as to what the physical differences are. That would be so interesting!
Thank you , Wendy! ❤👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
The $1,000,000 sounds like a $1,000,000 bucks. It was a startling, richer sound. On thev$5,000 cello the bass string vibrated visually, almost as if it were a bit loose. Your playing is hypnotic. Many thanks.
ОтветитьToo fast!
ОтветитьOutstanding! All three were so beautifully played. I got chills with the 3rd cello. Bach's cello suite no 1 is something I have played on my guitar. I have always loved it. I played it on a steel string Martin mahogany guitar. The deep sound of the mahogany wood makes it so nice, but the piece is meant to be played on a Cello and so beautiful.
ОтветитьThe difference between a highe end stereo and a Amazon bought one 😊
ОтветитьSame sounds 🥸!
Ответить2nd was miles ahead of the1st. 3rd was even better, but not miles ahead. Wow.
ОтветитьThe third instrument had a more balanced, clearer sound — the subtlest of the three.
ОтветитьI must say that they pretty much sound very similar. I could notice that the most expensive one has a slightly stronger reverb. The "cheapest" one gave me the impression that the bass notes sounded a bit deeper than the other two. The middle range one, whatever that means, was a bit "trebled" in general.
ОтветитьI love classical but my memory isn’t the greatest and forgot the name of this piece, can someone tell me the name of the piece she is playing please and thank you ❤
ОтветитьWendy Law's talent values 1 million dollar.... the cellos are just wood, metal and strings.
ОтветитьWonderful performance. I loved it.
ОтветитьBet if you did a blind test of which one sounds best over 10k people it would be 33% for each one.
ОтветитьIn my ear I prefer the 180k one 😁
ОтветитьDefinetly the second cello made more of a diference for me. The sound projected a lot more.
ОтветитьFellow 5000 Cello owners raise your hands! LETS GO!
Ответитьwell.. that solves it. I need a million dollars . hahah jk. I liked the last two in comparision. THe last one wasn't as bright . my fave
Ответить5k one was good, 2nd one I didn't feel anything 3rd one i felt significant vibrations when you started to play ... amazing! Thank you ❤
ОтветитьThat's a big ask, given the fact that 90% of the people will be playing this on their cheap 2" computer speakers, or worse, their cellphones / tablets.
ОтветитьVery beautiful
ОтветитьI found the more expensive ones has more high frequency overtones in general.
ОтветитьScreamed different 1 million so smooth sweet to the ears, $180 amazing too but $5k shit noise.
ОтветитьI would be very annoyed if my upstair neighbor makes this noise, no difference if he uses $5K or $5M cello.
ОтветитьU spent 1 million on wood and strings?😐apple music could make the same sounds and better for 10.99😭
Ответить180k.sounded with more substain...1m...was more balanced..sound..just my opinion, your mileage my difer...😊
ОтветитьMillion dollar cello is the best. Amazing sound. Multimillion dollar musician for sure as well! Phenomenal talent.
ОтветитьThe very low notes are best on the million$ cello, the rest (mid- and high notes) is better on the 180k one. But, that's just my subjective hearing......
ОтветитьI like the millon dollar chello. ❤
ОтветитьThey all do, in fact, sound better played by Wendy than my $600 cello with a weird bridge thing played by...me. hmm, so surprising.
ОтветитьYou make them all sound amazing!
ОтветитьDifferent on re note
ОтветитьI liked the 5k
Ответить1000K FOREVER
ОтветитьGostei do terceiro pela excepcional ressonância dos graves.
ОтветитьThe 180k cello I think it sounded too "bright" for a low frequency instrument, the 5k and one million were better for me, well, for the sound characteristics of a cello should sound like.
ОтветитьThe cellos all sounded wonderful and you played them beautifully. I prefer the third cello, I thought it had the fullest and deepest clean sound.
Ответитьin the third, at the end, tears 😢came to my eyes. complete harmony. smooth flow.
ОтветитьWendy has great capabilities to control cellos so that all 3 were sounding great although the other 2 more expensive cellos sounding classic. I personally love 5000 one for its strong and deep inside my heart bass.
ОтветитьYou could play on a two dollar Coello, it wouldn't matter to me. Yes... The last and best!
ОтветитьЗа лям бакинских лучше😂
ОтветитьI'm a cellist and I have played 5000, 50,000 and over a million (Stradivarius). Doing it yourself has quite a profound impact. I just played one note on the strad, and I had to stop to gain my composure. The teacher took the cello back because I looked too overwhelmed by it emotionally. I just played one note on a strad in my life (so far.) That Gagliano cello reminds me of a Dutod French cello that I used to play that is now valued around 50k. It has the same focused dark sound, and a similar dark reddish-brown varnish finish.
ОтветитьAll sound the same to me...beautiful!
ОтветитьOne must listen live, in person to tell the difference.
Ответить