Комментарии:
If i m company and someone cost 1.9M I wanna see results not only his marketing. And results i would seen most is how he not even won LFL when i doubt any LFL player he played vs or with him has price tag over 500k even that might be way too ambitious from me to even think they cost that much.
He dig his own grave long ago. Fnatic is literaly shelter where he can hide few more years (if).
This still ages well
Ответитьwho is baby rekkles?
Ответитьidk man if you buy a player like rekkles he brings in a huge following/brands etc. i thinks thats just to cheap to say oh well the other guy doesent cost as much
Ответитьuhm... you just described the difference between a rookie and a veteran. ... any player.. in any sport. I think everybody knows that already. but the question is, do you want a solid long term team? or do you want to sign a rookie where youre not sure where you will end up after a year, and either you gained nothing or your rookie will be worth the same and leave for the best contract. but to prevent a player from leaving you just give him a 2 year contract and bench him after 1 year, right? .... so thats whats going on.
ОтветитьThis aged well
Ответитьmf had to pull out the notepad to explain that one guy is more expensive than the other
ОтветитьWho the fuck thought that ''explanation'' is worth mentioning . That's how EVERYTHING works in the sports business. You have to PAY the established athlete , or you risk it with the ''potential'' guy. No shit.
The ''baby Rekkles'' will MOST LIKELY not end up to be a ''Rekkles'' , but u paid less for him so you swap him with the next talent with minimal damage. But , the chances of you winning anything are slim. In the off chance he proves to be good , you profit. Either for your org, or from the buyout.
Again. No shit.
Serious orgs around the world , will not do that. They have a big budget , they pay their ''established '' players , make a brand name , earn accolades , and once in a while they'' ll sign the ''15 year old unicorn'' . That's how scouting works. It doesn't defeat the purpose of paying your established guys though.
If all orgs think the same way , then that means the Riot E-sports scene is not profitable enough to justify quality in teams. Which means , the product is rotten OR the product is fine, but Riot is greedy.
Well, this title aged well
Ответитьcuz he sucks
ОтветитьAnd out of that 19 baby rekkles how much will perform at Rekkles level?
ОтветитьIf you compare it to other sports like soccer, you can also say its risky to buy these players. The best example would be harry maguire, the most expensive meme of probably all time
Ответитьwhat about ads and staff, if you are good business man you know you can make money out of RECKLESS, read story about real madrid buying Bekham
ОтветитьI hope bwipo will comeback in LEC. he is too good in quizzes
ОтветитьThis aged poorly
ОтветитьExcuse me but what kind of SUCCESS rekkles had and demand for 1M tbh, i dont see any reason for it XD
ОтветитьSomething you do not understand is marketing opportunities. The player is much more than just the person and skills. What you are explaining here has nothing to do with why Rekkles is not getting signed, also this module is mostly popular in Korean and Chinese teams, EU and NA is pretty bad at signing and grooming young players.
ОтветитьCaedreal speaks nonsense - what if you buy 19 Baby Rekklesses and they all suck? And that is closer to reality
ОтветитьExactly reckles is already a brand and a face of league of legends, not to mention is an OG adc of course is worth this much and u want what? A player who is getting nothing but to grow him u spend as much or even more în the long run then the reckles because reckles already has the branding and can get u some sponsors on your side, in the long run actually reckles is still worth but these buy outs are just dog
ОтветитьSo they're playing an ECO round.
Ответитьpretty much, good explanation
ОтветитьQuality over quantity
Ответитьthe algorithm truly works in mysterious ways
ОтветитьYou're also paying for experience, I see your point and am not disagreeing but replace rekkles with faker would you pay that then? Of course.. it's like anything.. nba football etc.
ОтветитьThat just means every legends in this system are meant to just desapear with time. This system is meant to value a constant turn over or very static players that start and end in the same team. You get too big? To bad you buyout will just be to high unless you accept not to play for one year (and then gain 0 money)
ОтветитьSeems like teams in general are no longer interested in veterans. Investing on rookies is a much better idea.
ОтветитьI think the problems are the shitty contracts they have forcing them to stay at g2 with that payout while g2 doesn't even have to pay salary apparently as long as they aren't playing.. Same for jankos I think
ОтветитьNow an idea of buying baby rekkless stuck in my head😂
ОтветитьHmm.. I understand the point he's trying to make but also you gotta take in that people buy in Rekkles cuz he's fuckn' Rekkles.
not just based on the cost.. although nowadays idk how far him being "rekkles" really counts anymore given his recent records.
redditors still dont understand its a business where only profit matters XDDD
ОтветитьMainly because rekkles can only play weakside, aka PvE mode for 35min
Ответитьrekkles is just bad
/closed
People seem to think he is talking about Rekkles salary... Caedrel is talking about his buy-out clause back when he was on G2, which Carlos made insanely high so no rival LEC team would get him.
ОтветитьCaedrel has good BZNS sense =D
Ответитьand the value of said player will go up as well, the ORG has added value to the player, so the gains are even higher than what you've laid out
Ответитьrekkles is willing to play for far less. he is the best adc in eu history by miles and should have a team.
ОтветитьIn any professional competition, be it sports and/or esports....an org has to simply answer this question. Do you really want to win? Because the ones that do will make the necessary moves that they believe will give them the best chance to win. It may be at the cost of a upcoming player or players but if you believe these upcoming players will give you the best chance in the next couple years, then you also have to make the moves to facilitate them in the coming years. That could simply mean building team chemistry and such. It's simple.....and the ones who want to "save" money, are more focused on the profits than whether the org wins or not. There is no wrong answer....that being said, it's not hard to differentiate who wants to win. That's not saying wanting to win means you can't make money because winning in itself will almost always make you more profitable. But orgs, especially esport ones, are given a few years to show what kind of org they are. And the successful ones all have one thing in common.
ОтветитьThere’s also the part where almost all of the million dollar imports have borderline inted almost every game after they got to LCS. Look at Perks, the “goat” that did well don’t get me wrong, but with how much he ran it down it was a joke. The same goes for swordart, huni, etc. Its also a lot healthier to try and foster domestic growth rather that just acting as a massive payout before retirement. Not that that’s why they do it, just works out that way.
I’d rather chance finding another baby Bjerg, Rekkless, etc and hopefully properly cultivating them than throwing massive paychecks at names. Just play off being a grassroots team with the goal at improving the league and bring in unique minds to improve a stagnant game…oh wait we tried that, had some wins, restructured, and dive bombed into one of the worst teams in the league.
You just bought a 1.5m sleeping farming adc and waiting for whole season to loss 😵💫🤬
ОтветитьTSM should get rekkles and build around him
ОтветитьHe cost too much and chokes at worlds terrible investment
ОтветитьYou couldve told it in one sentence
Ответитьbecause he is washed
ОтветитьWhy did this just popped again in my feed? Hmmmmm thinking emoji
ОтветитьHonestly, VIT Bo will fucking destroy EUW anyways
Ответитьmister catedral people who want to be at the top and want to win they dont ask about the price tag so this story is bs
ОтветитьNot many teams would risk wagering such a huge buyout knowing that even with a stacked G2 roster you can fail totally. Who is going to pick him up with a better roster or expect him to carry a team at that cost when he failed in a super team and then went to a smaller less competitive region for a season? They'd be stupid. That's before the other reasons not to.
ОтветитьDont waste ur time: Answer: Cause he costs too much, period.
ОтветитьIt's all good business
ОтветитьRekkles salary is definitely higher than 400k
Ответить