Architecture 14 of 23 Le Corbusier   The Cloister

Architecture 14 of 23 Le Corbusier The Cloister

Sivakumar Thangavelu

12 лет назад

141,600 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

Lincoln Chimento
Lincoln Chimento - 23.06.2023 11:23

Interesting, but I dont like how he takes himself so seriously. I bet he tosses his little pizza thinking about claustrophobic hallways because they have so many “layers of meaning”

Ответить
San Samman
San Samman - 19.06.2023 15:47

I don't like this building...

Ответить
Jacques Mertens
Jacques Mertens - 03.04.2023 07:29

The best thing that can happen to this monstrosity is a large bag of explosives.
Le Corbusier and the idiots who followed his lack of style destroyed more of our towns and landscapes than WW II ever could.

Ответить
Mu Chi
Mu Chi - 24.11.2022 20:22

There are more than 23 episodes. There are about 55 of them. I want this documentary collection so bad.

Ответить
Adi Lapic
Adi Lapic - 23.07.2022 15:40

Its not the building which pose a problem, but the human behavior which develops in such places, when evil people turn people hunters, greedy thieves & seek to control other's, which is most probably why this lovely building ended up with one ordained person. So we really need to work on our human behavior to successfully house so many homeless people in so many such lovely empty buildings, so people can peaceful live a fulfilling worthy good life & enjoy the nearness of God by living in such lovely building's.

Ответить
Jay C
Jay C - 12.06.2022 22:37

The building is a crude, cold monstrosity, sitting on a beautiful landscape. Some consider it a work of art? The exterior and the interior is it combination clumsy and brutal forms and crude details. Corbusier is one of the most overrated architects of all time. No matter how the commentator phrases it, or explains its features, it is what it is, there is no other way to describe it -terrible, intellectually pretentious. Crude lumps of concrete inside and outside!. It must have been awful to live there. I can imagine if they had picked an architect like Frank Lloyd Wright what the results could have been!

Ответить
Arturo Jimenez
Arturo Jimenez - 09.07.2021 21:39

Beauty is function, perhaps the most important function of architecture. Le Corbusier's conceptualization has its place, but his works and his influence have promulgated ugly, joyless and inhuman architecture found throughout the world. I have no interest whatsoever in living within a machine.

Ответить
jacques fauchille
jacques fauchille - 14.03.2021 21:29

Aujourd'hui les dominicains et les jésuites sont les tenants et les protagonistes de l'athéisme fraternel...en vogue. Ils interpellent la concrétude du vécu !!!

Ответить
Jen
Jen - 25.01.2021 12:47

If it were not concrete it would’ve been way better. The way it decolorized makes the building seem old and dirty.

Ответить
Romeo quadrifoglio
Romeo quadrifoglio - 03.05.2020 01:09

someone know the name of the music that start at the end?

Ответить
Andrew Makin
Andrew Makin - 23.01.2020 05:01

when austerity rather than opulence was understood as a gateway to transcendence

Ответить
melissaayna
melissaayna - 19.01.2020 12:03

Sorry , Do you have any ?

Ответить
Horacio Millán
Horacio Millán - 26.05.2019 04:08

I still don´t understand the adoration for Le Corbusier. I understand he introduced very interesting elements in modern architecture, but still his works seem cold and inhuman, like if you were destined to live in the interior of a freezer made of concrete. Maybe a great theory maker, but it´s so difficult to live in a theory.

Ответить
Wilhelm
Wilhelm - 13.05.2019 15:14

Disgustingly ugly. What an utter moron le Corbusier was.

Ответить
Wyn Deveron
Wyn Deveron - 05.01.2019 03:00

It is obvious that a terrible spiritual struggle took place here between the architect and his creation. The building is innately beautiful, so it would have required great effort to ensure that the final result was ugly.

Ответить
Soyhan Çoban
Soyhan Çoban - 27.12.2018 20:57

Muhammed türkmen bu hafta ödevi yapmamış

Ответить
Simon Jenner
Simon Jenner - 22.12.2018 19:41

It’s a perfect summation of everything that went aesthetically wrong with the Church in the 20th Century. Joyless, ugly, cheap, inhuman. Many have blamed this on Vatican II. But rather, Vatican II could never produce good aesthetic works in that milieu. And I say this as someone who finds great merit in much modern architecture. But the Church never seems to have favored anything other than intellectually pretentious and empty modernism, often if not typically hostile to her own history and forms. Quite sad really.

Ответить
Roelof Oosting
Roelof Oosting - 23.11.2018 15:51

And yet somehow this is celebrated architecture. People who enjoy this should visit Russia, we have loads of Soviet concrete prison style buildings left... if you want I can invent some pseudo intellectual / philosophical backstory to justify its existence... I can even put some freaky music and sound effects to it to enhance the BS and make it more palatable.

Thanks for sharing the video though. Thumbs up.

Ответить
Lisa Kilmer
Lisa Kilmer - 19.06.2017 04:34

I think I would call this early Brutalism. It is distressingly stark. I am surprised the monastery accepted this design.

Ответить