Комментарии:
Can't abide the jump cuts. Typical stupid American. Scared to stop talking for three microseconds. Your understanding of physics and chemistry is not good.
Ответитьthat one dude who bought the hazmat suit from ukraine was getting 78840 mSv/y
Ответитьwe used millirem
Ответитьim so sick of people trying to make crazy ways of wrapping their phone in alluminum foil to "protect" themselves from the "deadly radiation" it puts off. one lady wrapped her neck with a scarf made out of copper foil. she ended up getting copper poisoning on her neck, but hey at least she's safe from that awful EM radiation
ОтветитьJust a point of clarification, radio waves could damage cells by thermal ionization if they are coming out focused with plenty of photons. Just cause each individual photon can’t ionize it doesn’t mean you can’t ionize with increasing intensity. But I know you are just talking about cancer-causing mutation radiation and not burning. But I just wanted to clarify that radio frequency can cause damage if intense enough— see radio frequency ablation.
ОтветитьRh best
ОтветитьGrowing up in the 80s, we were taught about rems and rads. The new measures confuse the hell out of me and I keep having to use conversion calculators.
ОтветитьThank you, this was very helpful.
ОтветитьNo field has more units than Radiology... It's downright silly but this video is hands down the best quick explanation I've seen yet.
ОтветитьEveryone should know all things about these types of waves…not just these types but the types that are being studied in all types
ОтветитьThis video is completely wrong.
ОтветитьFrom what I have read and studied and heard cell phone radiation is not completely harmless. You might want to check into that a little bit before you say it’s absolutely harmless. I did appreciate the rest of your video though thank you
ОтветитьOk but whats usv/h?
ОтветитьWho is the presenter?
ОтветитьStraight to the point! Clears up a lot!
ОтветитьCool !!!
ОтветитьNo body talk about relationship between counts per minute and Sievert
ОтветитьI have no idea what you just said
ОтветитьREM's....Easy to understand.
ОтветитьYou seem to be doing the opposite of simplifying the issue.
ОтветитьRoentgens were so much easier to understand. I get why they changed to sieverts, but for the average person Sv are quite complicated.
Ответитьhappy to know there is people out there making sure i will learn about the Only Radiation Units i need to know.
Why would i be interested in anything else, ey?
Why would i think for myself, ey?
So i am VERY happy people put out videos like these, and label them with titles like: The only .... i need to know.
As if they are me, thinking the same way as me.
In order to have a meaningful conversation about anything, it's important to respect the one you are trying to have a conversation with.
Instead of ridiculing or discrediting or namecalling or anything else like that.
but we people are very happy that you, the Almighty, are able to share with us the Only Radiation Units we need to know.
Take a hike, will ya.
Excellent guide
ОтветитьAmazing presentation
Ответитьme with a chronic illness in my bowels.. 3 ct scans this year so 30 miliseiverts so say WHAT NOW
ОтветитьWhat's a curie tho
ОтветитьThis. Did not help.
Ответить3.6 Roentgen is 400 Chest Xrays
Not great not terrible
Awesome. thanks!!
ОтветитьHow do you pronounce µSv, as in individual letters?
ОтветитьSuper explanation
ОтветитьFun fact: the Soviet roentgen and the "standard" roentgen are slightly different. The Soviet one is often called the REV (roentgen equivalent value).
ОтветитьThe measuring cups in the thumbnail are genius.
ОтветитьOkay, But what's the upper limit.
I can get the explanation but not the number and I want to debunk this Karen in my family that thinks her baby monitor is giving her kid cancer.
What about neutron decay
ОтветитьI can’t believe this video misquote the Joule definition As something independent of time ??? !!! J=N m
ОтветитьGuess I’ve been saying roentgen wrong all these years. I’ve been saying it “rent-gun”
ОтветитьI've always used rem and I'm 27 so >.>
ОтветитьThese new terms for the same thing are idiotic.
ОтветитьMe and my tinfoil hat comrade disagree.
ОтветитьComrade Dyatlov said it was only 3.6 Roentgen.
ОтветитьThis video is rad! 😂
ОтветитьAll you need to know is annual average exposure is .002 sieverts and instant death is around 300 sieverts.
ОтветитьUnit not small enough? No fear. Make a new unit!
ОтветитьIf you want to be really strict, Roentgens for Ionisation chamber measurements, counts per minute/second for GM tube/Geiger measurements.
Ответить