RX 6700XT : FSR 3 vs FSR 2 1440p ULTRA in FORSPOKEN.

Forspoken is truly garbage

The difference is Noise (Pixelated) In any moving graphics.

Did you notice any visual improvements with FSR 3.0 compared to FSR 2.2?

Hair looks much better but other than that, not much difference sadly

so fsr 3 does nothing better than fsr2, nice. Frame Generation only adds fake frames to the normal frames, the game doesnt run faster. Its a pity and only relevant if you want 120 fps for your 120 hz monitor....

The FG section feels weird in games, showing high fps but still feel laging

I literally can't see any differences... That's what we all have been waiting for? Image looks same and not even one more fps

i found it impossible to test anything in this shitty game... AMD couldve done better and implemented it in BG3 or Cyberpunk, not these ass shit games forspoken and aveum

Thank you so much, i have been waiting for fsr 2 vs fsr 3 videos!

Please try testing cyberpunk 2.0 with Digital Foundry's optimized settings on PATH TRACING at 1080p native & FSR quality, balanced etc

I haven't found a single benchmarker testing path tracing on this card at 1080p

Both FSR3 and FSR2 are severely CPU limited. I want to see these in some other game where developers know how to optimize usage.

does turing on vsync and doing fps cap to monitor refresh rate make the game smooth.i heard it solves the fps timegraph problem

Very informative vid 😁

GREAT!!!

isn’t fsr 3 and frame generation available only on 7000 series ?

So FSR 2 and 3 are identical in performance without frame generation?
Is 3's picture quality better?

FSR 3 + FG its gooood