Комментарии:
Valuable video, thank you
ОтветитьThat is opensource, but AWS are scary happy to compete with their customers. Happened to us too!
Ответитьand you think Amazon won't do the same? just look at Google. Doing the same shit. Amazon is just mad it got beaten at their game
ОтветитьWhat a great explainer. Explained such complicated stuff around licensing so clearly in just 11minutes. Got to learn so much about licensing more than any other resource.
ОтветитьWas bit confused thanks for the explanation. 🤓
ОтветитьThanks for this good video :)
ОтветитьI guess I'll go with Solr
ОтветитьThis was very explanatory.
Also do a video of tech companies that started out as simple open source projects & went on to list on the stock exchange & become multibillion dollar behemoths
This was so clear and concise. Great job explaining! This is one of the best explanations I have seen in a while.
ОтветитьAmazon claiming to support open source they should collaborating with the company behind elastic search instead of trying to kill it.
ОтветитьWaw that's dirty
ОтветитьAs much as I dislike so many of Amazon's business practices, I do find Elastic's nerfing of their sdk/beat clients by blocking connections to OSS implementations of the server software very anti-open. This prevents any open use of ElasticSearch being usable by it's client ecosystem after v7.14.
ОтветитьExplanation for this couldn't have been better! Kudos :)
ОтветитьYou've been reading too much Elasticsearch propaganda! If "XYZ Elasticsearch Service" is trademark infringement, then almost every web hosting company infringes trademarks like WordPress, MySQL, Apache, NGINX, Linux... As long as the core software package identified by the trademark isn't modified, it's not trademark infringement to identify the product. Also, it wouldn't be trademark infringement to denote compatibility like "XYZ Service for Elasticsearch" or "XYZ Elasticsearch-compatible Service" – even if the package was modified.
ОтветитьIt's shows big problem that open source is orphan. People work doesn't matter.
ОтветитьGreat video to sort out the mess. I eventually chose OpenSearch for my project as it's just easy to use an AWS service, although I don't like the way Amazon as the bigger guy just infringed ElasticSearch's trademark bluntly and did not even want to give a proper apology at the very beginning.
ОтветитьAmazon is a nasty I thought 💭 f working for them now will never do.
ОтветитьLoved the explanation, thanks a lot
Ответитьhow about u? are u team elastic? or opensearch?
ОтветитьElastic's License should be on the end user's side whereas the AWS benefits from their managed IAAS
ОтветитьPhenomenal video. Subscribed.
Ответитьshame on amazon
ОтветитьExcellent review! Congratulations on the readiness!
ОтветитьConditional open source has been a thing since the introduction of copyleft in the 1980's, don't pretend like it's some new hideous subvertion of open source principles
ОтветитьCloud services aside, if you wanted to run elasticstack in your own premises, the main reason for choosing OpenDistro was that it included security features like role based access, ldap integration and TLS - you know, the bare minimum, whereas the only elastic alternative was to pay for Xpack. For small projects or customers this was not feasible.
Without this debacle, elastic would probably never have felt the urge to include these features into their products. So that’s a good thing.
Linux Centos (free) vs Redhat (paid) - So many vendors use Linux at no cost. Why is this any different? I thought Opensource was not about the money. AWS is charging for the hardware and the management of its backend. Elasticsearch needs to be competitive with its managed offering and API integration. Like Redhat and other vendors who you pay for support.
ОтветитьReally good until that "fair share in taxes" nonsense. Lost a lot of credibility with that.
ОтветитьQuality vid man
ОтветитьExcellent video. Thank you.
ОтветитьBoth companies have the same motivation, money. The thing is, when all the cards were on the table, only Amazon actually chose the open source route.
Elastic wants the money and the good will, but doesn't have the fortitude to commit to actually being open source. They are just source available, or "open source with a booby trap". They want their cake and to eat it too.
I don't like Amazon, but at least they have so far commited to true FOSS principles, they have a roadmap for setting up an foundation for the OpenSearch project to get it out from under the corporate heel. I don't think "wanting people to develop the software for them" is a fair criticism, isn't the point of OSS exactly that people can choose to contribute and all parties benefit.
If only enterprise software companies were half as good at explaining their solutions as you are! Great explainer video!
Ответитьyou got a really nice channel here.
ОтветитьCheers for the video, good insight.
ОтветитьThanks for this neutral explainer, really informative
Ответитьwhat about apache solr , at least mention it
ОтветитьAmazon just seem to become more scummy by the day
ОтветитьI find myself in elasticsearch's side why do people het mad about the company trying to make money? its not the forst time amazon has undercut competitors
Ответить