Комментарии:
No offense but the category highest tier was "is this real" which means that the renders those softwares provide is close to reality..
I would personally definitely replace vray and put it up there next to corona and put escape in the good tier
( Doesn't mean its not easy to use and costwise its very very good ) but vray definitely is way way way more realistic than enscape.
Btw iam an interior designer
cool ranking :)
ОтветитьBlender is complicated? Pff...
Nevermind, this tier list is just some kind of trolling xD
Dude you rated blender in meh ? Its on par with vray and corona in terms of realism.
Ответитьhe puts enscape at the top haha
Ответитьnah, v-ray is easy to use.
Ответитьnot saying cycles is the best render engine ever created, but rating it "meh" is a criminal offense lol. dont just go around rating stuff based on how well you understand them
Ответитьahahahahhahahahhaahhahahahahahaha
ОтветитьThea?
ОтветитьI don't know what they've done with Enscape. Version 3.5 is extremely unstable. For now I'll stick with 3.4.4
ОтветитьI would add Fstrom on this list of renderes. I would add it to the S tier. It's very easy to learn and powerful tool to use in the arch viz industry.
ОтветитьIt all goes to how accurate do you want to be.
Arnold, V-ray and Corona are most accurate calculators, which actually gives you ability to be special, because every tweak you make, it appears on render.
Lot of "fast renderers" are like AI, they optimize your inputs, good for starting out, but as you become better, you demand more accuracy and control over your inputs.
As for now, I use 4 render engines regularly depending on the task I have.
CentiLeo GPU renderer really made difference, very fast and easy to use, almost perfect for infographic animations and it's free.
Corona render No.1.
FStorm render No.2.
Everything else is child’s game….
hmm, Renderman? Arnold? Redshift? Octane?.....
Ответитьbro that clickbait, I was like he uses it so often no way Enscape is shitty thank god
Ответитьyou should probably name this video ranking every architectural software because you are categorizing them based on the modeling and its compatiablty with archi viz not the rendering quality/time
ОтветитьWell , after go through all the comments here I have decided to go for either Blender or Enscape.
ОтветитьHave you tried Maxwell? It's one of the few options that you can buy instead of leasing.
ОтветитьThis is the worst tier list that i've seen
Ответить'blender = meh"
"corona = first" LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLL
what are your evaluation criteria? realism? easy to use? No sense list
Keyshot?
ОтветитьMy opinion is that the the qaulity that you can achieve with Unreal Engine 5 is much , much , much , much better than enscape (but is more difficult to use unreal respect enscape, there's no doubt)....is on another level of quality and D5 render is much better than enscape in terms of image and video...i use both and i want to modeling complex object sketchup is not the proper tool to do such things...3dsmax have corona and easy livesync with d5render and unreal with datasmith.
ОтветитьBlender is way higher than where you placed it
ОтветитьOMG. Blender as renderer? It should be cycle or eevee bruh. Did you use blender3d for real? Or only heard of it?
ОтветитьLost touch for a few years. What happened to Maxwell?
ОтветитьMy man you put unreal engine in top of blender 💀 i got it cycle is not that good but if we gonna talk about difficulty unreal is hard one and don’t let me talk about the bugs in their software
ОтветитьVantage is amazing. It is actually Vray realtime, pure raytracing, without any of the technical tweaking issue. A pure gem.
ОтветитьWhy not review Redshift.
Ответитьgodamn, bro needs a new mic
ОтветитьYa all sleeping on blender and ue 😔
ОтветитьEnscape Interior Lighting? Is Not Make Sure😬
ОтветитьYou mentioned all the rendering engines except Octane Render, even though they are the most developed on the market, along with Red Shift 🤣
ОтветитьUnreal Engine 5 is also the fastest and most realistic rendering engine after Octane Render. all other engine cooked scenes give artificial and fake 3d vibe.
ОтветитьJESUS you are MEGA misleading people
ОтветитьThis seems a bit bias, just saying, really enjoyed the video thou
ОтветитьBlender is by far top tier for me. As a render engine it’s free, that’s the best ratio of cost.
ОтветитьI think you are joking, right?! Blender at Meh? You have no idea. Get your affiliate link and move along! Pfff...Enscape should be at the bottom of the list, bad quality, fewer features, and not a complete 3d software, but a cheap childish renderer.
Ответитьunreal Behind D5? unreal at the same level as lumion??? wtf are you smoking bro.
ОтветитьWow, finally someone who goes straight to the point. Thank you.
ОтветитьI have worked with 600 3d Software in depth and advanced features
what makes you a king to critism
L takes
ОтветитьFor Exterior Lumion
For Interior D5
For both UE5
yes it is your opnion I Disagree with it
ОтветитьI used Artlantis for years and developed a very cold hatred for it. Horrible interface, crap results.
Even the help forums had a bad vibe. Siege mentality etc.
It does have its advocates but then again, so does masochism.
The fact that you get to use the Quixel library for free in Twinmotion makes it #1 in my books ( +Path Tracing is a major game changer)
ОтветитьEnscape, to me, seems to be one of the last rendering engines to be realistic. It may be fast but not realistically.
ОтветитьUnreal Engine technology is taking over the industry or architectural visualization by storm. Yes, it's more complex but that just translates into more possibilities.
ОтветитьEnscape sucks for vegetation. and the reflecting... bah
Ответитьone thing I disagree with, because in Enscape you can't animate humans in motion
Ответить