AMD FSR 3 vs Nvidia DLSS 3 With RTX 4090

Dude should stop lying or educate yourself DLSS 3 is on 2000 and above series.
In 3000 series you only miss frame generation which is part of 4000 series.

Doesn't the game developer implement FSR 3 at their own pace?
From what I understand the 2 games might just be the first to finish the implementation?!

I was excited for FSR 3 but then found out that it doesn’t provide any picture quality enhancements.

Hello can someone help me with cpu and gpu problem? When I play any game my cpu usage always skyrocketing to 100% and my gpu is only 40-50% usage so there is a lot of stuttering, fps drop and lagging but the loading speeds are fine. What should I do? Do I need to upgrade my cpu or gpu or is the motherboard the problem that is causing it? I hope someone see my comment

Baffling how not even the rtx 3000 series supports Nvidis's frame generation

Meanwhile, FSR3 is gonna breathe new life into older and weaker gpus, even from their direct competitors.
AMD is the best ❤

Can someone please enlighten me how fsr or dlss is better than native? And why does Nvidia and AMD have to go such lengths in developing these upscaling technologies to produce higher frames at the cost of image quality when gamers agree that native and high frame rates + ray tracing is better than those fake stuff? We're paying more for those graphics cards that support these new features but we can't even play those games at native resolution. So what's up with that? Shouldn't we be supposed to be getting stronger gpus instead of these fake stuff? As far as I know, rtx 40 series is very underwhelming except for the 4090. It's frustrating when we could just game in a much simpler idea with Native + high graphics settings + high refresh rate. Easy but we can't have that can we?

I'm just curious how anti aliasing can improve FPS and latency - it's normally costs some performance as any other post processing, so something is fishy with this "native AA" mode

so basically DLSS is giving you fake FPS at the cost of Latency while FSR is giving you real FPS at no cost?
i want a visual comparation not only performance one...

I'm not on that train. I happen to like forspoken. I can say. FSR3 works great in that game as well.

Why didn’t this melon test on a 7900XTX?

اعتقد ان AMD تتأخر عن nvidia بالاطلاق حتى ترى ماهي الأخطاء وتقوم بعمل شي افضل من nividia

Ray reconstruction..

Looking at my RX 6800 ... I mostly play DCS WORLD...well?

funniest thing is that forspoken has borked implementation of FSR 3 while aveum is very snappy, and the 20 player one did it better, doesn't seem to make very positive first impression on this limited crowd

The 1% lows simply destroys it. I hope it's just this game

The nvidia latency counter on fsr3 is broken.

Should actually run it on resident evil 4 and village even 7

Imagine knowingly paying for Forspoken. 🤔

I wonder what Nvidia's gonna do next, it's always good to have this type of competition.

The most PC optimized game I ever played has been Alien Isolation. Runs fantastic even on old PCs...

:) apu gaming is going to be godly. 😅 I'm not going back to pc gaming ever again. (Planning to get strix point apu or later.)
Mini pc/handheld. I ll get what ever is cheap.

Frame-time measurement with 3rd pt tools not supported with FSR3, which is why afterburner goes nuts.

This was always AMD's weak spot in marketing their products, they have always played catch up with Nvidia. Imagine if AMD revealed FSR 3 with Starfield in tandem, the amount of attention it would have gotten would have been incredible!

RIP DLSS 3 😂

this is not some smart test because who have have 4090 that one will use dlss and who have 7900xtx or similar that one will use AFMF ,FSR3 and hyper x and will have 2-3x more fps anyway

FSR 3 would not increase fps something but AFMF will do it just like Hyper x

who have 4090 that one obviously dont need this shits as dlss or fsr and FSR 3 will be better because it will be available for older cards and both brands and even intel gpus while dlss are only Nvidia garbage and for newer cards most

They should've released it on Avengers

Nobody cares...nah..everyone is broke and pheening for these games personally. I pray for income and a job to better enhance my life with these quality titles being release slowly but surely...amen😅 may we all come up with something good you know..❤come on man this technology is great. But whats with the hud in the middle of the video.

now we wait for amd to finally improve upscaling quality. i get why it looks the way it does, it's designed to be as lightweight as possible, but i would love to see them going with intel route and doing something like utilizing their new gpus compute power to improve image quality while still allowing use of upscale on older hardware with worse image quality

Question is, in terms of image quality and artifacts, which one is better?

conman hey your frame time scores do not match the frame time graph. How much do you get paid to shill for AMD. you are not trustworthy.

If FRS 3 was available in Space Skyrim, AMD would've sold so many more GPUs.

AMD blows just look at all the games they partnered with they are all bad. And look at the consoles they are all trash.

Now with AMD FLF allowing a fairly compromised FG in most DX11/12 games, it is safe to say AMD has more features than Nvidia at this point, with Nvidia still having the better quality features (DLSS, DLDSR down-sampling, RT performance). Hopefully in less than a year or two from now, AMD will finally catch up with DLSS in image quality and Nvidia will hopefully add a FLF competitor for all their RTX GPUs.

But, Nvidia's DLSS 3 'upscaling' looks 5x better in motion than FSR 3. 🤷🏾‍♂️

damn 10gb of vram usage with dlss while with fsr it was under 10gb. and a big fps differences between dlss and fsr is what actually surprises me.

Lol fsr3 didn't outperform dsl3 1% low are the more important in 4k gaming and fsr3 has the amdeep the avg is not that important on 4k

with fsr the overlay was displaying render latency which is very different from the dlss test where it showed pc latency. dlss has lower latency i'm 200% sure. with fsr3 you cant use reflex and with dlss you can. also idk that game is also dogwater wish they implemented fsr into starfield or something actually relevant that people might actually play

You have 1% lows of 72 or higher with 110+ average frame rate. It’s clear which one is the real winner even though you don’t wanna say it.

when you put ugly wahmen into your game, dont expect money comes to your pocket

Maybe they picked those games because they have terrible performance. So that it shows off how much of an improvement you can get.

Btw the latency did not drop from 70ms to 10ms. You can notice that in the native rendering it shows "overall PC latency" (input to screen), but when you enable FSR FG it only shows "render latency" (how long does each frame take).

How is the image quality of these comparitively, FPS means nothing if in order to be 10 percent faster they have to be 10 percent worse in quality. We need to make sure the quality is the same otherwise it's like saying 1080p has more fps than 1440p therefore it's better. I hope fsr3 is great, because fsr2 is kinda rubbish and I have a 6800xt.

I currently run an Asus ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 OC 12G LHR Graphics Card

Mainly playing Diablo 4 and COD. Getting seemingly endless DirectX errors!

A friend of mine suggested I get a PowerColor Radeon RX 7900 XTX Hellhound OC 24GB

I need help guys!

You can’t compare system latency to render latency