What Does An Atom REALLY Look Like?

Ha ha ha its an illusion 😅😅😅

So what really happens during these "quantum jumps" of electrons from one orbital to another? Old man Bohr left us with no coherent explanation of what actually goes on.

Neglected to illustrate what the orbital clouds look like. So, you didn't show what atoms "actually look" like...

I'm tired of watching videos and physicists talk in ways that sound like this, "Everything in physics is mad, crazy, insane, mind-blowing, impossible to visualize, totally loco, hard to understand, hard to explain, hard to visualize, etc..." You might as well say, "If you don't have an IQ of at least 115, you might as well turn this off and go flip a burger for someone." How are we going to get the average person on board with these ideas if you keep saying that its crazy.

What is outside of the Omniverse Huh. I want to know.

Sloppy and Jokey presentation

Então é o elétron q absorve a luz ou foton, e depois de passar de uma órbita a outra "devolve" a luz (foton)?

Hey, Nick is the mass of an atom proportional to the velocity of its electrons moving at relativistic speeds?

Yeah, but what does it look like lol

Math is everything—Max Tegmark’s mathematical universe hypothesis (MUH), aka ultimate ensemble theory. MUH has its critics.
💕☮🌎🌌

Hi Nick great video, I had a question... Can the probability waves of electrons interfere like other waves do , I read about the molecular orbital theory and it says the interference of electron waves (constructive or destructive ) leads to formation of molecular orbitals , so what is actually happening?

So how does an atom look like?

I know I'm a little late but I got a question : how does atoms bond ? In chemistry we learn that they ''share'' an electron... but how ?? If electrons are in constant motion, HOW ??

ziomuś pod mikroskopem widać...wyluzuj

Yeah, I have a question: What do atoms look like?

Can you take the neutrons, protons, and electrons from an abundant material? Basically, what I mean is can you separate those things out, and add a different amount of it to create an element? For example, if Uranium 235 needs 92 protons and 143 neutrons, can you take 92 protons, store them somewhere and combine them with 143 neutrons to create Uranium 235?

About Aristotle, he opposed the idea that there can be a single particle, which is building block of all matters and can't be divided further into sub-particles. But atoms, indeed, can be divided further into sub-particles. So, in a way, dude is still right!

It's easier to image that electron like all other particles can exists in 4 forms depending on its energy level: solid (single-point charge), liquid (half-forcefield spinning around the nucleus), gas (really probabilistic weak forcefield covering whole nucleus), and wave (string-like wrapping around the nucleus like multiple orbits).

Thank you for trying, but it's still too technical for us dummies. Who needs science fiction when we have real science.

On the topic if electrons...

As far as I understand it, Born did not consider his probability distribution as a literal interpretation of how particles behave - just a description of what happens when they are measured, or, our experience of them.

The mathmatics seem to describe what is observed - particles are in superposition until they interact with other particles. Would it be more reasonable to say that a single photon from a radio wave was always destined to arrive at my antenna or that the electromagnetic feild simply localized it there once it encountered it? The former explanation just doesn't seem to comport with QFT. Farraday field lines are evidence enough for me. The feild itself pre-supposes the existance of the virtual photon - the wave packet is a spontaneous manifestation of wave-like fluctuations in the field.

Got any questions? Yes. What did I just watch, lmao. Give me a year or two to try to understand this video, but really interesting stuff honestly.

Kya baat batie

Hey new subscribers love you content
I have questions i ve been told that light travel at 300,000km/s for any observer that means if i have a machine that travel a lets say 100,000km/sec and i measure whats the light speed it will tell me its 300,000km/sec and not 200,000km/sec
Can you explain why

But wait! Don't some spectral lines have a "width" that is really a bunch of smaller spectral lines, bunched around the wavelength? I would expect a smooth distribution due to something thermal, or whatever, but when I look up some lines, they are really a cluster of lines...........or am I wrong?

his final picture does not show other things we are told like the electron is a long way away from the nucleolus and they go in pair and look in a orbital.well look on other sites.There is a lot more to know.

GIGA CHADWICK

What has been shown as what an atom, proton, nucleus, and other types of particles is a theoretical map based on derivatives from equations. It is only a derived visual representation. With increased technology scientists are starting to be able to actually see these very tiny quantum level particles/entities. Even with this we cannot see them absolutely clearly.

... that is why I really love science! 😁Uncertainty.

Atom theory did not begin with the greeks but in ancient india. Einstein, von Braun, Oppenheimer and many others studied ancient indian texts before they came up with seemingly "new" ideas. Oppenheimers famously quoted the Bhagavad Gita. Check this out and make a new video on that please, that would be very interesting.

Why are you being like a mad

So if electrons in an atom cannot be moving themselves without releasing energy, howabout they are in a 'matter' and it's the matter that is moving.
When an electron escapes an atom, does it then release energy ?

Nick Lucid? That name is very appropriate. I like it a lot.

Excellent summary! Thank you!

Один пищдеж

I’m more confused than ever!! 😂

Say hello, wave goodbye.

😂why did I make you😅

Hi, if a particle can be here or there with an uncertain probability, does this mean it has the possibility of travelling faster than light, presumably “there” would have no boundaries, or am I missing something. 🤔

Is there a on density function theory and couple cluster theory??? If not it's a request please make one

I do have questions, but I can't even start to explain them.

Yeah but I can tell you exactly what Adam looks like.

it wasn't Greeks but Indians who suggested the idea of atoms. Most notably Acharya Kanada.

Are the waves it's own magnetic field? If it lost strength in it it would change it's value.

But in electron microscope we atoms which are sphere like are they orbitals or electrons revolving nucleus

Tell in simpler way... Does electron revolve around nucleus ?

So the elctrons are weird fundamental particles which are weird and not weird at the same time.

It's really helpful for highschool!!!

The way I think of atoms is like a ceiling fan on the high setting. The middle core is relatively stable and the electrons are spinning around it, so incredibly fast that is acts like it's in all locations in it's path at once. Even though technically if you could stop time it would have a definite position.