Комментарии:
You also have to wonder if the Vox article is a confusion technique. A modern day photoshop of old images.
ОтветитьIt is creepy that I was thinking about almost this subject this morning, then this video came up on my suggestions.
I was thinking about historical photo manipulation but also, Tartaria maps, which all seemed to emerge at a similar time. Those who follow Tartaria often suggest the Bible is a fraud. I wonder why they don't question these maps being frauds? After all, the Bible has been around for at least generations. Thee maps have either been hidden, which is the as claim, OR they have recently been produced. The only reason I can think in such a case of them being deliberately produced, is to create the Tartaria narrative in hopes of denying the Bible. Not too dissimilar to the dinosaur idea and I notice that those who do follow Tartaria, do deny the Bible. So that is particularly interesting.
Now AI does it for them. ..
ОтветитьNow imagine if NASA figured this sorta thing out (sarcasm)...
ОтветитьOur fore fathers were quoted..."trust No one & question everythyng.
ОтветитьPhotoshop since 1800s, mercy
Ответить1860 a photo was altered of Calhoun head was switched with Abe Lincoln!
ОтветитьEpisode #48 "my lunch break" is about old world travel, n zeppelin.
ОтветитьY'all would like, "my lunch break" if you enjoy "mind unveiled "
ОтветитьI remember a channel a few years back showing potential for WW2 fakery
ОтветитьHad family friends, in the 1970’s in the photo biz. I would witness on many occasion the reworking of very old negatives. I was just a naïve kid and now realized what I was witnessing.
Ответитьwhat is your point you rat,you want to convince people that the highly superior technologies did not exist hundreds of years ago?are you a communist liar?
ОтветитьYES!!!
Ответитьprobably trying real hard to reach this proposition..
Ответитьbrilliant
ОтветитьZoomer discovers analog photography none of this stuff is new to Gen X
ОтветитьThe truth is out there, and so are the original negatives!
ОтветитьWow, so well done! I knew this was being done, but you show and explain it all exceptionally well. Thank you for your work and sharing this info!
Ответитьvanilla (n.)
1660s, "pod of the vanilla plant," from Spanish vainilla "vanilla plant," literally "little pod," diminutive of vaina "sheath," from Latin vagina "sheath of an ear of grain, hull of a plant" (see vagina). So called from the shape of the pods. European discovery 1521 by Hernando Cortes' soldiers on reconnaissance in southeastern Mexico. Meaning "flavoring extracted from the vanilla bean" is attested by 1728.
Ai brings it present to all now.
Ответитьthat's nice and all (not, actually) but, what exactly then were they hiding and why?
ОтветитьNear DETROIT there is a medical plaza just to the north Berkley MI. It is called the NorthPoint Heart Center. 27901 Woodward Avenue, Berkley Mi. Inside this plaze the walls of every level are decorated with enlarged historical photos of Detroit. It is a marvel to witness the noststalgia captured in this collection of photos. But it did notice some painted images of people and it struck me as curious. But without the conspiritorial insite provided by your research I just shrugged my shoulders and filed it away as one of those unexplained things not to lose any sleep over.
ОтветитьNow I question every old alien space ship picture.
ОтветитьYo, what about the Blimps? We don't see it in these white sky photos, but I swear, they were editting out the use of Blimps back then. Like, it was waaaay more common for people to be traveling in the air in the early 1900s or something.
I believe I've seen a few pictures from someone else that showed, clearly that there are huge blimps that they kept, as we see here now, it's their version of Photo-shopping things out. Like, you could see a faint image of a blimp in some of these pictures. It was weird.
Does anyone know what I'm talking about? lol. I swear, I need to find one or the video I saw of him showing one.
I have many postcards from the early 1900s from my home town, and you can tell they take out the telegraph line, power lines, and cables for the street cars. I have found the original or similar pictures in books that are not updated. They even make night scenes by coloring them differently.
ОтветитьThis was awesome bud , I knew SOME little things about photography but you just smashed it ! It actually helped me understand my stupid friggin phone's camera settings too lol
ОтветитьA great many people believe in The Moon Landing because they heard it live on the radio.
ОтветитьAmerica is a history of Lies.
ОтветитьGreat video!
ОтветитьFor sure there was something in the skies they were hiding... My guess is airships.
ОтветитьUsing Wikipedia as a source is a bad idea. It's mostly fake information
ОтветитьMaybe it was. Doc Brown. Run for it marty
ОтветитьThe algorithm is listening.... I referenced these pictures to my wife yesterday. I have multiple videos in my feed now
ОтветитьI majored in photo in high school. Dark room and all. Good times. Absolutely beyond plausible. 🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯
ОтветитьThroughly enjoyable. Thank you 😊
Ответитьwhat is it they were hiding....
ОтветитьEven in the sixties we used photo blue pencils to mark art/or photos because it didn’t show on camera
ОтветитьI am old enough to be a county worker that had to “clean up” old photos and reprint.
ОтветитьAI generated pictures. Before AI, the photos were genuine.
ОтветитьAgain, when you think on the words and their meaning... "Imagery" similar to imagination. So an image isn't photo\proof, just an expression. "Production" creating a "product"... Doesn't mean it's real. Always a loophole or some trickery going on in this realm.
ОтветитьNew theory: the sky was never real and thats why we struggle to capture it😅
ОтветитьVery excellent presentation
ОтветитьThere's evidence to say that as far back as the 4th century, a camera obscurer type device was in wide use, so it's not a stretch to think that photography is much much older than we know.......🙏🏻🫶✌🏽all the best to the both of you
ОтветитьSo the question is,what were they hiding in the sky?
ОтветитьThis investigation into... photography and label we call the lost arts...things people cannot understand unless they are involved into these techniques and devices... medieval age still has sway over human perception.,. previous advance civilization has left its marks...builders marks... scrying... eye pieces..lens origins..
ОтветитьOf course old photos were manipulated. Most of what they teach you to do in the darkroom can be called photo manipulation, which you need to do to get a good photo. Photography used to be a skill, there was no point and click before digital image processing. People today might not know those photos were doctored, but anyone with a library card could get that information in the days before computers. It wasn't a secret. Get an SLR and take a picture of a well lit landscape without blowing out the sky, it's not easy to do unless your Ansel Adams. It was much easier to fake a sky for the purpose of selling postcards, newspapers, and magazines. Or composite and vary exposure times during enlargement to get a nice range of tonal depth to a portrait. Even amateur photographers eighty years ago knew this. Now do a video about how no one was told that fashion magazines airbrush photos of the models, on top of all the makeup they wear, to give the illusion of being flawless. That's the real evil propaganda. What is this sick compulsion we have, to pretend things can be perfect?
ОтветитьWhy would Hitler remove Goebbels from a picture? He was the only old guard Nazi left at the end. Himmler and Goering both tried to negotiate with the Allies w/out him,Hess was locked up in England,Heydrich and Rohm were dead. Interesting that the picture erases Goebbels. I wonder why.
ОтветитьIt’s just like how they’ve been using the same stock photo of planet earth in all of our texts books since the 1950s. Not only do they still use that same exact image today but it’s literally used everywhere so it begs the question as to why they haven’t updated the Earth’s photo portrait literally ever!?
Ответить