Комментарии:
Harry's House? On what planet? Harry Styles cannot perform his way out of a paper bag. Simply ludicrous.
ОтветитьI noticed if you look at the genres all the winners have a pop leaning. Like hip-hop stuff is not just straight rap but has a lot of singing in it. Same for rock, heavier stuff like Metallica is not going to win, they all have a bit of a pop leaning.
ОтветитьIncredible, 95% of the choices were wrong. Good job Grammys.
Ответить2024 will be Midnights
ОтветитьMade in Thailand from Carabao was 💀💀
ОтветитьWorst list of all time.
ОтветитьMJ got robbed in 1988
ОтветитьOk computer is better and more significant than 90% of these albums...
Ответить2018 aoty should have gone to Lorde melodrama. But 24k magic also deserves it.
ОтветитьBut this ranking is mixing genre, there is many other winners per year in other genre right? isn't?
Ответитьits ridiculous how in the 2000s no rapper/hiphop artist won this award (except Outkast). Eminem, Jay-Z, Kanye, Nas, etc. those guys albums were so much fucking bigger than whatever the grammys decided to award
ОтветитьPeople in the comments need to understand the award is for the whole album, people getting mad saying others deserved it but I think majority of them were the right decisions
ОтветитьLes grammy aucun respect pour le rap
ОтветитьIf justice existed in the world, Lady Gaga would've won two AOTY for TFM and BTW, Lorde would've won one AOTY for Melodrama & Beyoncé would've won three AOTYs for the self-titled, Lemonade, and Renaissance. SMH
ОтветитьChristopher Cross in 1981 is a war crime with The Wall as one of the candidates
The Beatles just one time?
The Grammy are one of the worst things ever created
SZAs NEXT 🚢🛳️⛴️⚓️
ОтветитьTo pimp a butterfly? Illmatic?, Good kid maad city? College dropout? The grammys are crazy
ОтветитьPurple Rain ....without Grammy ????? Ridiculous
Ответить1998 best album is ray of light the MADONNA
ОтветитьQue en los 2000 no lo haya ganado Hybrid Theory es un robo
Ответитьthere is a surprising number of people in the comments who don’t understand that Grammy nominations and winners are from the year before the award is given
ОтветитьIs there something I don’t understand, 52nd street was released in ‘79 and it’s counted as 1980?
ОтветитьGramy is sucks.There is no Pink Floyd,Queen,Led Zeppelin,Rolling Stones,Metallica,AC/DC.
Even biggest band in music history got 1 album in list.
I was expecting to see a Pink Floyd album, at least one.
Ответитьthese are some crappy choices
ОтветитьNo Rolling Stones
No Led Zeppelin
No Elton John
No Madonna
No Michael Jackson
No Eagles
No AC/DC
No Queen
No Metallica
No Guns N' Roses
No Nirvana, Pearl Jam, Soundgarden or The Smashing Pumpkins
so do they judge rap separately or are they just racist
ОтветитьThree times Taylor Swift and no Joni Mitchell for AOTY. Incomprehensible.
ОтветитьMUY MAL PREMIACION Y EQUIVOCADA....T O D O S LOS ALBUMES DE THE BEATLES DEBIERON SER LOS GANADORES EN LA DECADA DE LOS "60 ....y los de PAUL McCARTNEY posteriormente......
ОтветитьHated when Christopher Cross beat out Pink Floyd's The Wall for Album of the year.
ОтветитьWe can call folklore pop all we want bc it's labeled that, but NOTHING on their is pop to me 😭 Maybe The Last Great American Dynasty has a bit of a beat but everything else is strings and piano. Idk just seems weird it's considered indie AND pop.
Ответить"And the Hammy goes to... "
ОтветитьMy got. George harrison got award 1973 whitch from concert for bangladesh.congratulated 🎉
ОтветитьDefinitely America, a lot of real crap stuff here. late on.
Ответить1972 should have been dark side of the moon.
ОтветитьEvidence the Grammy's have mostly been an irrelevant joke.
ОтветитьThe Beatles Sgt Peppers is my favorite album
Ответитьthe grammies have always been afraid to give this award to the best albums...
ОтветитьGod, there were some shite albums in the 90s.
ОтветитьSuch embarrassingly middle-of-the-road choices.
Ответитьyou know the grammys are shit cause The Weeknd has 0 Aoty's
ОтветитьI feel like many of the 90s picks were older folks "apologizing" to legends from their time who were snubbed in their prime. Clapton, Bennett, Dylan, Santana in '00, Steely Dan in '01. Quincy Jones was pretty damn old by the 90s too, though he did produce Thriller which won in the '80s so he was still pretty popular. All great records imo, but the Album of the Year should be reflective of the musical zeitgeist of the times. Ironically, Clapton (via Yardbirds) would have been a frontrunner in '66 and Dylan in '67 had it not been for the influence of that time's own older people pushing Sinatra during the height of 60s rock music; Steely Dan and Santana could both reasonably have won in the 70s if the Grammies had a policy of not picking the same artist multiple times in a few years like Wonder did in the 70s and Taylor is doing now.
It's just as preposterous for the 90s not to contain any Nirvana and only one Hip Hop album as it is for the 60s not to contain any Dylan and only one Rock album.
Illmatic robbed
ОтветитьThe Grammys are horrible and always behind the curve
ОтветитьWhere TF is nevermind by Nirvana
ОтветитьWho's Judy Carnegie? 🤣
ОтветитьPura mrda
ОтветитьOh boy, Grammy’s album list is so pointless: How can they find all the most overrated artist’s blandest albums? My goodness, I haven’t seen anything this colorless, odorless and tasteless since oxygen. However, unlike oxygen, I am happy to live without any of these😁
Ответить2010: Taylor Swift
2016: Taylor Swift
2021: Taylor Swift
2024: Taylor Swift
33: João Gilberto* try not to misspell the name of the king of bossa nova
Ответить