Комментарии:
I am confused, why does the fx30 look better????????????????????????//
Ответить3 things you should know about me.
1.) I love me some macgregorworks, from the vimeo days ten years ago. He is the master.
2.) there is no way the cameras are correctly labeled in this video. Its backwards.
en 4k 30p hay recorte en la fx30?
ОтветитьFX30 looks better to my eye. Super35 look = movies. I don't care what anyone says.
ОтветитьCan you take a few steps back with the FX30 and get relatively identical images?
ОтветитьThe almost look the same. If you want to save money you will be very happy with fx30
Ответитьlooking like fx30 got more dynamic range ?
ОтветитьWhat`s the picture profile (or gamma) on both cameras? The difference between tho underexposed shots is night and day.
Ответитьwow really makes me want the fx30 - that said, how easy is it to get similar color and DR out of the fx30 similar to fx30?
ОтветитьWhich lenses were used please?
Ответитьfx3 is better by default hands down
ОтветитьWow this was surprisingly helpful! Thank you for providing the comparison in 4k!
ОтветитьGood test. FX3 would be much more cheaper.
ОтветитьFx30 is god 😊
ОтветитьFx3 is superior
ОтветитьBad test!!!
Ответитьthanks for the comparison. not worth the price on the fx3 expecially when my main objective is low budget pornography..
ОтветитьThe FX3 looks slightly less sharpened which makes it look better. Besides better noise.
ОтветитьWow! Iso test in broad daylight
ОтветитьDe calidad de imagen se ven muy similares, verdad? incluso parece que clipean sobre el mismo punto en altas luces
Ответитьwhat is the name of the trial, I wanna go visit. Is there fall color to see nearby?
ОтветитьIs that Mt Whitney? or near Coyote flat or Inyo National forest
ОтветитьAwesome!
ОтветитьLooks good. But do you ever miss the old F35?
ОтветитьI immediately noticed how noisy the FX30 from the promo videos.. As if the noise is almost on par with a6300 sensor? Am I wrong here?
Ответить