Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Quimbee

2 года назад

27,255 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@billslim1112
@billslim1112 - 10.06.2023 13:56

As much as having the option of Abortion is probably a good law to have, ultimately if it isn’t upheld by the Constitution then the Supreme Court were obligated to rule accordingly, regardless of political opinion

Ответить
@manofthehills5001
@manofthehills5001 - 04.10.2022 19:10

Roe was an example of result oriented jurisprudence. The justices wanted a result, so they stretched and manipulated the text of the constitution to get what they wanted. Dobbs corrected this. Good on the SC for finally getting rid of that ridiculous precedent.

Ответить
@rchapman6803
@rchapman6803 - 17.07.2022 14:31

"Unborn human being" is the term Associate Justice Samuel Alito adopted to overturn Roe. What am uneducated BOZO. I hope he is not having sex because he will abort millions of "Unborn human being sperm" every time he ejaculates. A Supreme Murderer?

Ответить
@pippahgetchell7757
@pippahgetchell7757 - 01.07.2022 03:34

I have posted full readings of the majority opinion and the dissent in Dobbs v Jackson (two separate videos) on my channel for anyone interested in listening to these full opinions of the Court.

Ответить
@RuralJuror420
@RuralJuror420 - 30.06.2022 03:12

This case really just proves that we need to ignore the Supreme Court. I would genuinely love to see 9 people try to defend whatever they say is constitutional or not. The only power they have is their perception of legitimacy. Without that, their rulings mean nothing.

Ответить