Комментарии:
Thanks dude ... imma try it on my futures prop firm 😅
Ответить🏁 0.5%-1.5%
ОтветитьHow do i calculate the contract size or lot size after i have decided what percentage of risk i will use?
Ответить❤❤❤❤
ОтветитьWhat a bunch of bs . “Are you profitable “, if i was I would need your advice. Being profitable is the hard bit, everyone knows basic money management, you learn that in your first couple of weeks of your trading journey.
Sick and tired of all this mentors who focus on bs like psychology and money management ( basic MM) and skip over the actual thing everyone came on yt to find out, a way to help them become profitable.
Bro posting heavily hhh are you in deep drow down 😂
Ответить🏁 Normal does not make money, so I'll go with the aggressive one.
ОтветитьI'll be using a normal risk managment approach with 0.5%-1% risk per trade, since I have never made money in the markets before. 🏁
ОтветитьBrother kimmel is making trading simple, one video at a time 🏁
ОтветитьNormal risk management (0.5%) is ideal for me.
ОтветитьVideos are on fire 🔥lately, material being shared is top quality 👌. Muito Obrigado.
Ответить🏁will go with the normal approach
Ответить🏁 NORMAL RISK MANAGEMENT 🏁 Love ur vids btw Kimmel
ОтветитьWill surely be going with the normal path, with the 5k or 10k account am going to win.
And surely sticking to the % I get from the formula 🏁
🏁 I'm going to use the normal I've been taking too long on challenges I know when to reduce my risk when the account goes below the starting balance. Mi g kimmel top guy
ОтветитьGreat Advice! Thanks 😀
ОтветитьNormal 🏁
ОтветитьGreat information sir , i would like to try the Normal approach method on a 10k account with 0.8% risk per trade and after passing the phases I change the risk percentage from 0.8% to 0.5% per trade with consistency in live acc🏁🏁🏁
Ответитьsoo true, I risk 0.20% per trade due to this I take 4 Months to pass Phase 1 of 10K Account. Now I Understand how I Change my risk Approach acc. to equity curve. thanks Kimmel🏁🏁
Ответить🏁 Aggressive all day all night
Ответить🏁 Surprisingly, I'm using the normal approach right now. 0.5% - 1% per trade. Managed to claw back from -2% drawdown to +2% on my current evaluation. That and sticking to one strategy also helped.
Ответить1.5% per trade 🏁 I hope I will win
Ответить🏁 In 2 years of prop trading challanges I lost 2 accounts in the first 2 months because of the wrong account sizes and i was going for 0.10% / trade but i had 30 days to reach the target ... so i was dead from the start ... Then i focused on nor loosing the chalanges on MFF so that i had the option to reset the account and learning . now i'm going on the 0.5 % normal 1% just if i see e perfect perfect setup and 0.1 % just for training, if i see a setup forming but is not in my usual patterns. BTW i use the 5000 accounts for now as proof of concept... if I go from challange to payout 2 times with a 5000 account then I can move on to bigger sizes.
ОтветитьTake SL to 50 % trailing as soon as trade goes into your profit area that way you can take 2 SL in the cost of one 🏁 ( it depends on your strategy also ) 🏁🏁
ОтветитьThe normal is the most reasonable option at any time. 0.5% - 1% puts enough buffer.
If I can add one thing here, it is once an account is below the starting balance, risk 0.5% then when BE or above the balance, you can risk 1% again and it will still make sense.
Well done giving explanation and suggestions. A lot will benefit from it kimmel 🏁
🏁I'll go for the Normal approach, 0.5% - 1% risk per trade on the 10k account
Ответить0.5% per trade, 1% overall🏁
Ответить"tens of thousands, not a lot of money"
Ответить🏁 thanks for the video, I was going with the normal approach 0.5-1% until now and that's how I'll do it from now on, it seems to be the best for me
Ответитьyou have to do some formula for thw swing traders, who take also 1 trade for week
ОтветитьYou need a good strategy, be patient and only take the best setups and not over trade.
ОтветитьI would go for the Normal approach, 0.5% - 1% risk per trade as I see this is what suits me best 🏁🏁
Ответитьnormal
ОтветитьI passed phase 1 as normal trader and went to 4months of lossing streaks 😢but haven't failed yet bounced from -8% DD to -4% now
ОтветитьNormal is good for me
ОтветитьGreat video,but what RR do you recommend
Ответить@Kimmel Kimmel, who runs the world really? Is there a colony on the dark side of the moon? Is Michelle Obama actually a man Michael Obama ? All questions I need to figure out before the next session…
Ответить🏁 i was thinking of trying a funded account challange and you made this video at the right time. I was thinking of 1% per trade and as per your suggestion i might just go ahead with it. Thanks alot for this valuable video. Keep up the good work.🎉
ОтветитьI have 50k topstep challenge, max loss limit 2k, my risk is 0,5%🏁
Ответить🏁 Normal at the moment but, planning to try other 2 risk management in the future... let see how I feel on each one :)🏁
Ответить🏁 I use between 0.25-1 percent risk. 1% is my max. When I go over that amount, I tend to blow my challenges.
ОтветитьThanks for the explanation ... For me I will go with the normal approach 0.5%-1% 🏁
Ответитьaggresive🏁
ОтветитьThank you for sharing. I plan to use the aggressive option to pass a challenge.
ОтветитьI normally trade a 50k account with $2,500 drawdown, which is the maximum amount of money given. If I risk 1%, that would be $25 per trade, right?
ОтветитьGreat stuff as always!
Normal approach seems suitable for my style tbh. But I have never seen this approach as per week. I always used 1-2% risk per trade when I am in profit and 0.5% when I am in loss. But this weekly trades formula seems more efficient. Thanks for the video 🏁
Agradecido pelo diagrama. fiquei agora a conhecer o teu canal não sabia que és Português 👍
Ответить🏁 The "Normal One" like Jürgen Klopp said 😅
ОтветитьThe normal risk 🏁will work for me thanks a lot.
Ответить