Комментарии:
I thought t34 couldn't pen tiger frontally. At least that's what soviet and german war time instructions said.
ОтветитьThe 76mm gun of the T34 piercing the frontal armor of a Tiger I?.........I don't believe it.
ОтветитьSorry but it was a nightmare for the t34 to destroy a tiger frontally... Really doubt that they could without being extremely close....
ОтветитьI think I remember reading somewhere that in order for a T-34 to go through the Tiger armor like this it needed to get close, it was between 500 or 100 meters (probably around 300m since the gun is punchier than the M4 75mm). Otherwise it's the same as a Sherman
ОтветитьRange?
ОтветитьWhat is this simulation thing all of these people are using???
ОтветитьThe Tiger of Franz Staudegger during the Battle of Kursk contradicts the simulation.
Ответить200 meters its a 100% kill
Ответить102mm*
ОтветитьAbsolutely unexpectedly... 76 mm cannon couldn't penetrate tigers front armor according to all documents
ОтветитьДело не в технологиях. Дело в людях! Нас не сломить! Мы драли вас, дерем и будем драть!!!!
ОтветитьHey man can you tell me what shell is that ive been looking for it for 1 week
ОтветитьYou mean that wolverine is better armored than a heavy tank?
ОтветитьЕсть пробитие!
ОтветитьTiger ll: ja ja ja no
ОтветитьLove to see wehrboos cry after finding out that Tiger wasn't at all invincible super beast but surprisingly vulnerable kitty
ОтветитьThis ammunition was very rare and with normal ap they had no Chance to PEN
Ответитьlol bs it accelerates halfway through
ОтветитьГладко было в симуляге, да забыли про овраги😂
Ответить76mm APCR is very unhealthy for tiger drivers and machinegunners.
ОтветитьIt would be interesting to repeat this simulation, but with just the core impacting the armour, without the carrier. This would show the people that the mass of the carrier contributes significant portion of penetration in this design.
ОтветитьRemeber boys, always angle your Tigers!
ОтветитьHow close is the t34 in this scenario because range will definitely impact it's armour penetration effectiveness?
ОтветитьХерня какая то сраная 34 ка пробивает тигр а34 ку обстреливает мелочевкой какой то
ОтветитьI like how you took into account the Russian bias
ОтветитьGaijin would love this
ОтветитьI dont think that would happen. The T34 must be under 100 meters to the Tiger 1 to do a shot like this. And everyone knows that Tiger would have spottet that T34 and shot it. And from 100 meters the T34 wouldnt survive one Shot from that 8.8 cm KwK. Am i right?
but you are doing cool vids!
👍
Fake. T 34 "oтсacывaл" from Tiger I
Ответитьthats the 76mm what will happen with the 85mm cannon?
ОтветитьThere was a case when T-34s actually burned 6 King Tigers, but they ambushed them hard in cqb
ОтветитьThat round looks exceeding stupid. Looks like something a child would select.
ОтветитьProblem is the Tiger never got knocked out fromt the front by t34.76
I can show you an example of one taking over 120 rounds in the front with no penetraton
In the field most if not all.rounds would hit at varying angles reducing pnetration in armour
ОтветитьDo the same with the T34-85(Zis 43) AP shells at 500 meters
ОтветитьWhat? T-34 don't pen a frontal SIDE, the T-34-85 in effect pen a frontal tiger
ОтветитьWw1 tanks
Ответить102mm not 100mm and no thé T34 76/57/85 don't pen thé Tiger
ОтветитьOne thing about the BR-350P is that if it barely penetrates the armor, it shoots a nasty jet of spall wherever it hits
Ответить200 yards is suicidally close...
ОтветитьEvery Tiger commanders know to angle themselves when fighting. This is the worst case scenario I guess.
ОтветитьHow disappointing
Ответитьi can smell the werhaboo copium already
Ответитьsu 152 fire ms1 please
ОтветитьHans : remember son always angle your tiger
ОтветитьCan you do the M26 Pershing's T33 APC vs the Tiger 1's frontal upper glacis? I mean we all already know it will go straight through like a hot knife through butter considering the T33 APC shell was made to counter an objectively better armored tank than the Tiger 1. I just think it would be neat to see how badly it would mess up the armor.
ОтветитьAPCR point blank at no angle of course would penetrate. What about a more realistic engagement? >1000m at ~30° ?
ОтветитьVery confusing ... 900m/s is almost muzzle velocity, also this T34 shooted from very very very close distance i think no more than 80meters... in real combat almoust unrealistic... reality was on 500m penetration about 90mm at 90° and 1000m penetration about 60mm at 90°...
ОтветитьWhy you don´t simulate normal shell? APCR was rly very rare.
Ответитьdistance of approximately 0.2 km...
Ответить