T-34 vs Tiger | Armor Penetration Simulation | BR-350P

T-34 vs Tiger | Armor Penetration Simulation | BR-350P

Dejmian XYZ Simulations

2 года назад

363,310 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

Ivan Buncic
Ivan Buncic - 16.04.2022 11:54

I thought t34 couldn't pen tiger frontally. At least that's what soviet and german war time instructions said.

Ответить
NEWTECNO80
NEWTECNO80 - 22.08.2023 12:43

The 76mm gun of the T34 piercing the frontal armor of a Tiger I?.........I don't believe it.

Ответить
David Villamarin
David Villamarin - 17.08.2023 01:44

Sorry but it was a nightmare for the t34 to destroy a tiger frontally... Really doubt that they could without being extremely close....

Ответить
ExoticDachoo
ExoticDachoo - 26.07.2023 02:10

I think I remember reading somewhere that in order for a T-34 to go through the Tiger armor like this it needed to get close, it was between 500 or 100 meters (probably around 300m since the gun is punchier than the M4 75mm). Otherwise it's the same as a Sherman

Ответить
Valek
Valek - 20.07.2023 20:00

Range?

Ответить
Abel Cantu
Abel Cantu - 13.07.2023 12:01

What is this simulation thing all of these people are using???

Ответить
DilophoMS
DilophoMS - 27.05.2023 09:46

The Tiger of Franz Staudegger during the Battle of Kursk contradicts the simulation.

Ответить
Marty
Marty - 05.04.2023 17:33

200 meters its a 100% kill

Ответить
Tutel
Tutel - 03.04.2023 11:39

102mm*

Ответить
Viktor2 2010
Viktor2 2010 - 03.03.2023 11:40

Absolutely unexpectedly... 76 mm cannon couldn't penetrate tigers front armor according to all documents

Ответить
Георгий Бублик
Георгий Бублик - 25.02.2023 15:38

Дело не в технологиях. Дело в людях! Нас не сломить! Мы драли вас, дерем и будем драть!!!!

Ответить
Zack mercado
Zack mercado - 11.02.2023 14:56

Hey man can you tell me what shell is that ive been looking for it for 1 week

Ответить
7 7
7 7 - 03.02.2023 21:25

You mean that wolverine is better armored than a heavy tank?

Ответить
Юрий Карабанов
Юрий Карабанов - 03.02.2023 16:30

Есть пробитие!

Ответить
Jesus
Jesus - 23.01.2023 18:09

Tiger ll: ja ja ja no

Ответить
Frisho ,
Frisho , - 25.12.2022 10:35

Love to see wehrboos cry after finding out that Tiger wasn't at all invincible super beast but surprisingly vulnerable kitty

Ответить
Julian
Julian - 08.12.2022 15:47

This ammunition was very rare and with normal ap they had no Chance to PEN

Ответить
Festung Kurland
Festung Kurland - 04.12.2022 18:23

lol bs it accelerates halfway through

Ответить
восточная пруссия
восточная пруссия - 04.12.2022 13:11

Гладко было в симуляге, да забыли про овраги😂

Ответить
Иван Игнатенко
Иван Игнатенко - 22.11.2022 16:31

76mm APCR is very unhealthy for tiger drivers and machinegunners.

Ответить
Peasant
Peasant - 13.11.2022 11:04

It would be interesting to repeat this simulation, but with just the core impacting the armour, without the carrier. This would show the people that the mass of the carrier contributes significant portion of penetration in this design.

Ответить
Phoenix draws
Phoenix draws - 03.11.2022 23:42

Remeber boys, always angle your Tigers!

Ответить
Akka
Akka - 30.10.2022 18:11

How close is the t34 in this scenario because range will definitely impact it's armour penetration effectiveness?

Ответить
Alexander Tach
Alexander Tach - 20.10.2022 14:40

Херня какая то сраная 34 ка пробивает тигр а34 ку обстреливает мелочевкой какой то

Ответить
ImGeet
ImGeet - 10.10.2022 23:27

I like how you took into account the Russian bias

Ответить
Freedom Fighter
Freedom Fighter - 30.09.2022 16:23

Gaijin would love this

Ответить
Rose 94
Rose 94 - 27.09.2022 18:53

I dont think that would happen. The T34 must be under 100 meters to the Tiger 1 to do a shot like this. And everyone knows that Tiger would have spottet that T34 and shot it. And from 100 meters the T34 wouldnt survive one Shot from that 8.8 cm KwK. Am i right?
but you are doing cool vids!
👍

Ответить
Humans Power
Humans Power - 10.08.2022 01:43

Fake. T 34 "oтсacывaл" from Tiger I

Ответить
Eru MC
Eru MC - 03.08.2022 03:54

thats the 76mm what will happen with the 85mm cannon?

Ответить
wolfdima
wolfdima - 03.08.2022 01:20

There was a case when T-34s actually burned 6 King Tigers, but they ambushed them hard in cqb

Ответить
M60gunner1971
M60gunner1971 - 01.08.2022 11:42

That round looks exceeding stupid. Looks like something a child would select.

Ответить
Bill Turner
Bill Turner - 30.07.2022 18:13

Problem is the Tiger never got knocked out fromt the front by t34.76
I can show you an example of one taking over 120 rounds in the front with no penetraton

Ответить
Eric
Eric - 30.07.2022 12:31

In the field most if not all.rounds would hit at varying angles reducing pnetration in armour

Ответить
Patrik Tóth
Patrik Tóth - 29.07.2022 15:59

Do the same with the T34-85(Zis 43) AP shells at 500 meters

Ответить
Miguel Vazquez
Miguel Vazquez - 29.07.2022 02:47

What? T-34 don't pen a frontal SIDE, the T-34-85 in effect pen a frontal tiger

Ответить
5 4
5 4 - 28.07.2022 06:29

Ww1 tanks

Ответить
Le Faucon
Le Faucon - 25.07.2022 18:07

102mm not 100mm and no thé T34 76/57/85 don't pen thé Tiger

Ответить
Soup God
Soup God - 25.07.2022 05:21

One thing about the BR-350P is that if it barely penetrates the armor, it shoots a nasty jet of spall wherever it hits

Ответить
Paul Kachur
Paul Kachur - 24.07.2022 16:09

200 yards is suicidally close...

Ответить
nomad li
nomad li - 22.07.2022 05:26

Every Tiger commanders know to angle themselves when fighting. This is the worst case scenario I guess.

Ответить
N0bLy_Hades
N0bLy_Hades - 19.07.2022 18:11

How disappointing

Ответить
Nyaman
Nyaman - 18.07.2022 06:36

i can smell the werhaboo copium already

Ответить
denny pandu
denny pandu - 10.07.2022 06:41

su 152 fire ms1 please

Ответить
Lemon Naru
Lemon Naru - 05.07.2022 17:23

Hans : remember son always angle your tiger

Ответить
They call me Orby
They call me Orby - 02.07.2022 07:29

Can you do the M26 Pershing's T33 APC vs the Tiger 1's frontal upper glacis? I mean we all already know it will go straight through like a hot knife through butter considering the T33 APC shell was made to counter an objectively better armored tank than the Tiger 1. I just think it would be neat to see how badly it would mess up the armor.

Ответить
Tim Goers
Tim Goers - 01.07.2022 20:34

APCR point blank at no angle of course would penetrate. What about a more realistic engagement? >1000m at ~30° ?

Ответить
Jaroslav Klíma
Jaroslav Klíma - 01.07.2022 11:20

Very confusing ... 900m/s is almost muzzle velocity, also this T34 shooted from very very very close distance i think no more than 80meters... in real combat almoust unrealistic... reality was on 500m penetration about 90mm at 90° and 1000m penetration about 60mm at 90°...

Ответить
Jiří Rudolf
Jiří Rudolf - 30.06.2022 15:04

Why you don´t simulate normal shell? APCR was rly very rare.

Ответить
Deus ex
Deus ex - 29.06.2022 18:27

distance of approximately 0.2 km...

Ответить