Intel i5-9400F vs i5-9600KF vs i7-9700KF vs i9-9900KF // Test in 8 Games

FPS is more than 60 in all games. Poor graphic card which makes processor 30% - 75% idle. So the comparance is awfull. Please use the more powerfull graphic card and settings.

Benchmarking CPUs while playing at ultra graphics 🤡

i currently have a i7 9700kf but id say that for anyone watching this video, just go with one of the i5's because there is a huge price increase for not that much preformance, maybe like 10-20 fps at most and im thinking of buying the i5 9400f in the future for another build. price to preformance is insane on the i5's

intel core i7 9700kf was really fast in nfs heat

With a 3060 and I-9700kf I get only 60 fps on high settings is it smth I am doing wrong

Thanks for doing this 👍

I am also now thinking whether it is worth switching from i5-9400f to i7-9700k with an exchange and a surcharge of $131.

Тесты процессоров с упором в видеокарту... блястяще!

Why i5 9600kf is more powerful than others 😳

i5 9600K is similar i7 9700K , and i see a i5 9600 K at 185€ vs 370 for i7 (i have i5 9600K , i do not change for i7)

do i need to upgrade my i5 9500f to i9 9900kf?

The i9 9900k is better not just because of the frame rates. Look at the load, the 1% lows and yes even the power consumption. I personally would buy the simple i9 9900 even now in 2021 because if your gpu has an issue you can always fall back to the integrated graphics for normal websurfing until you get a new one.

Что у тебя за видюха?

So I have an i9 9900k and an i7 9700f with an Asus Tuff 3070. I see that there performance with a dedicated GPU is only like 2 to 3 frames per second difference. So, do I utilize the i9 9900k for the few extra fps with a 30watt higher usage, or stick with my i7 9700f and get a few frames less while only uses 65watts of power? I think I'll go with the i7 9700f... It runs a lot cooler and I highly doubt that 2 to 3 extra frames per second is worth the additional 30 watts that the i9 9900k with is 95watts of energy consumption.

Who cares about frames per seconds??? I see the same thing an all screens.100 fps, 10.000 fps, who cares.

i5 9600 rocks

is it worth 9400f upgrade to 9700k

The i5-9400 looked best to me.

yeah maybe it's same but look at the stress on CPUs

THANK YOU IM GOING TO BUY THE I7 9700 KF

무슨 차이지...

5-9400 Is so realistic. Idk why but it is really realistic

Why is Fortnite the same video on all the cpus

Yeee👍

Man that cod sound like a fking horror movie

Hello nice comparison, idk why the clock of the i5 9600kf its in 4250 mhz, why dont u boost it with turbo technology or OC to get more mhz? i want to know because i have that cpu with a 1660super and im not very satisfied with the gpu... i have the cpu in turbo to 4.6ghz and thinking to upgrade the gpu to a 2070s or a 2080s idk, why do u think

Это враньё у тебя дже 9 процессор видюху не нагружает ты чот подкрутил там

@ItBeRyan You are wrong, brother.
- For K, your explanation is right, but for F, your explanation is wrong. 'F' does not mean that there is no integrated graphics in the CPU. Actually, 'F' CPUs do have EXACTLY the same integrated graphics modules inside the CPUs as those in their non-F CPU counterparts.
- The reason why you cannot enable the integrated graphics modules inside the 'F' CPUs to be usable is because Intel shielded or electronically blocked them. However, they do physically exist in the 'F' CPUs. The only difference between F and non-F is just whether Intel has programmably blocked the integrated graphics modules or not.

My i9 9900 KF is a sweet spot

It looks like the clocks on 9600KF, 9700KF and 9900KF were configured different on purpose to get a difference. I saw tests on other channels that showed results almost identical to each other when locked to the same clocks. Why 4295/4600/4700 if all of them could reach the same clocks?

It looks same vedio but written different

At my old job, people spent 1000 dollars on one singular tire, 500 bucks on each rim, and shit load of money on oil they didn't need. For people harping on how much of a waste the i9 is, I've seen waste like you never seen before.

The i7 9700KF is almost better than the i9

Did you use actual different CPUs or just underclocking
Also like come on man, just use the ultra settings. It's so unrealistic to compare CPUs on a game like rdr2 with medium settings

For those wondering why the i9 sometimes does more poorly than the i7, it’s largely because the i9 and i7 are both 8-core processors and a lot of games do not optimize code for multithreaded performance.

you could have go the i7 and the i9 to 5ghz easily for more fps

Absolutely NO

I don't see no difference, but my wallet does.

Nice benchmark, but no one will buy a K processor and play in stock, We wanna see in 5ghz

What is the program used to monitor the hardware?

Congratulations for 3000 subs and again kepp it up you make the best hardware tests on yt

Is the KF better than the plain K?

what is the first song pls