Комментарии:
At the end of the Video you mention thename of Kevin, who developed the formulas for n-dimensional spheres.
I could not understand his second name or find him amongst the patreon list.
could you, please, give me the second name.
thanks for this and, above all, your Videos!
Dieter
Why we can not use the gamma function to evaluate the integral
ОтветитьSo cool that I just now found this video a week after showing that a random variable counting the number of arrivals as a function of time in a Poisson arrival process must be Poisson distributed using the same style of qualitative conditions -> e argument in the Herschel-Maxwell derivation; a month ago this would all have bewildered me but here I am seeing the same idea used twice!
ОтветитьTheres just one little hole for me: I dont understand why should we use multiplication when we say x and y are independently making up the f function (property 2 at the Wigner explanation). It all works because of that but I dont see why would it be necessary to use multiplication instead of something else like addition.
ОтветитьI like the ai images in this one
ОтветитьI can finally feel that the definition of normal distribution is worked out by human beings instead of coming out of thin air, what a great explanation.
ОтветитьNeed to know if Wigner's statistician is the hot redhead. Asking for a friend.
ОтветитьWe had a joke in our Further Maths class (all two of us😁):
if your answer's got pi in it, it's probably right
if your answer's got pi AND e in it, it's definitely right.
This was beautiful
ОтветитьI watched a part of this video already, but paused and after some time I came back to it. And this time, I stopped at the n-dimensional volume formula for the sphere, and man! I just can’t figure out the volume of ball boundary for n=1. Why should it be 2??
Ответитьe has to do with circle
ОтветитьMan, how do you imagine these !
ОтветитьAmazing !!! Thanks a lot ! NOTE: It would be nice to build a 3D Galton "board" or a simulation ...
Ответитьsuper awesome, thank you guys it was eye opening
Ответитьmuch bla
ОтветитьWhat a great video.
Ответитьприкольно увидеть математически правильное решение.... на физике меняли x^2=X*Y и интергрировали по двум координатам dXdY, в принципе сходится но в истинность слабо верится, хотя таокого в физике хватает
ОтветитьGreat video. What is the software you are using to implement functions?
ОтветитьI keep finding in math that learning the history of how an idea was discovered serves to illuminate the idea in general, and makes the "modern" version of that idea so much more satisfying as well as easier to work with. Thank you as always.
ОтветитьI remember the bonus problem being the last problem in my integral calculus final exam... I love the professor now, but back then I would've killed him
Ответитьthis guy has such a creepy voice, stop quasi-lisping and smiling as you speak, it's insulting to your audience
ОтветитьThis brings back so much memories. I remember the first time seeing this proof in my multidimensional calculus class. I was literally blown away when I connected all the dots. It’s so neat and trivial. I just realised how fun math was back in those days.
ОтветитьI just simply started learning normal distribution but was NOT satisfied with the explanation in the book for Probability density function (PDF) and Cumulative density function, I just started digging and asking why's on how the formula of PDF was deduced. And now I am watching this video. Mathematics is a dark and GORGEOUS !!!
Ответитьgreat one
ОтветитьIn calculating the micro-states of ideal gas what we have to do to calculate the volume of the n-dimensional hyper-sphere in our undergrade physics. The video is as always great.👍👍
ОтветитьLearning calculus has definitely influenced and changed my life. Thanks for the deep dive on one of my most inspirational problems in mathematics!
ОтветитьPausing the video halfway to say that You are a magician 3Blue1Brown.
ОтветитьAmazing explanation and funny narrative 😃 Thank you for creating such beautiful content, keep it up 😃
ОтветитьWhat about central t-distribution and other symetrical family?
Ответитьcan someone explain why is it f(r)=f(x)*f(y) and not f(r)=f(x)+f(y) when grant mentioned they are independent?
ОтветитьThqnk you very much.
ОтветитьGrant, thanks a lot for your work. You're really just one of a kind.
ОтветитьAmazing, Im speechless
ОтветитьConfirmed: pi is 4-dimensional
ОтветитьPleease statistic series
Ответить@3blue1brown Can you do a series of electron probability distribution to explain atomic orbitals?
Ответитьİ am waiting for a probability and statistics series .Please
ОтветитьIs there a vid by 3B1B explaining what's a gaussian?
Ответитьoh my goodness the visuals are stunning. just when i thought 3b1b videos couldn’t get any better!
Ответить3b1b officially passes the Bechdel test
Ответитьthat "who ordered another dimension?" joke made me crack up lmfao
pure into maths jokes
🤎💙💙💙
Ответить