Комментарии:
This happened to be the first time for me to understand this furrier series. Thank you abundantly, sir.
Ответитьyoure the best!!!!!!
Ответить"MY PS5 WONT LEAVE ME ON RED'
ОтветитьWow, 😲
ОтветитьKing of Fourier.
ОтветитьI guess N is now the n-word for maths, everyone avoids it with Z+
ОтветитьCos(-pi*x)=cos(pi*x)
ОтветитьJust imagine this: Josehp Fourier got really excited after he discovered the Fourier Series, he ran to his wife to proclaim his mathematical breakthrough, and his wife said: " That is great honey, now go change the baby's diaper.".
Ответитьbest math teacher ever
ОтветитьI'll always say it 0 has got to be my favorite number, it just makes things easier
ОтветитьBro you look so happy teaching math, i wish professors and teachers would also have the same passion and love for teaching and solving math problems
Your energy altered my mood too, i was so stressed
Thank you so much for everything
With Love from syria❤
Clear and concise! Excellent, thank you!
ОтветитьThank you sir form India 🇮🇳
ОтветитьI started to learn Fourier series. I studied for about 3 hours, an extremely brief intro, the calculations were very easy but what were the intuitions behind it? I thought I would never know. Then, this video appeared, thanks Sir.
ОтветитьGreat video. You explained it in a really nice (completely perfect I'd say) way and I enjoyed filling in the gaps with the double angle formulas and stuff.
Ответитьwhy are we getting amx pi instead of summation of amX pi from m=1 to m= infinity?
ОтветитьThank you! ❤️
Ответитьfucking calc 2 man, i swear imma kms before the end of this semester
ОтветитьSir I didn't understand m=n and m=|n case
Ответитьthis guy is literally became my math teacher
appreciate your teaching
Best explanation 😍😍😍😍
ОтветитьAlthough I have already learned Fourier series, your explanation gave me new inspiration😀
ОтветитьI have 15 years temperature data. I want to remove seasonality variation from the time series data, so how can I get the constant term ao, the amplitude and the phase change by using these given temperature data? thank you
ОтветитьCan you do a video that shows how to go from the Fourier series to the Fourier transform? Thank you so much!
ОтветитьThanks
ОтветитьGreat presentation.
Have a better understanding of Fourier series now. How this man came up with the series and transform is beyond me.
amazing . love it
Ответитьthanks, the vids are addictive
ОтветитьThank you. But I have a problem to solve on Fourier series on doubly period sequences. I would be grateful if you can assist me with that. Thank you.
Suppose $Tx = h*x$ with kernel $h(j,k) = [1,-1]$ (with all other coefficients =0) and that.\\
\[x(j;k) = \begin{bmatrix}\\\\
\hphantom{000} 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 \hphantom{000}\\
\hphantom{000} 0 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 \hphantom{000}\\
\hphantom{000} 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 1 \hphantom{000}\\
\hphantom{000} 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 \hphantom{000}\\
\hphantom{000} 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \hphantom{000} \\\\
\end{bmatrix} \in \mathcal{R}^{7x7}\]
%
(zero padding sorrounding the image in the center).\\
What is $H(m,n) = \mathcal{F}_{7x7}(x)(m,n)$ and how is it applied to $X(m,n) = \mathcal{F}_{7x7}(x)(m,n)?$
the best way to think about this and get a true and deep understanding about it, is if your approach it from a linear algebra point of view. the key to the whole thing is inner products and they will solve all yo' problems
ОтветитьThank you so much. You explained it really really well.
ОтветитьI don't understand
ОтветитьI am an Indian🙏🙏 and I really like the way of your explanation ,👍👍
it was just....wow.....👌👌
Great work
ОтветитьExplained it quite easily
ОтветитьGreat teacher, I can now derive Fourier coeffients, thank you so much
Ответитьwell explained!😊
ОтветитьMy best lecturer
ОтветитьThis is so fun. Great presentation!
ОтветитьThank you so much!!!!!!
ОтветитьYou are a lifesaver ily 🤍
Ответитьyoure the best
ОтветитьLove this guy's channel. never stop holding that mic and saving my degree. big love from England
ОтветитьHello. I don't know if you'll answer this but I would like to know if it is ao or ao/2. I have been confused about that. I don't know the correct one. Please help
Ответитьthanks man, amazing
Ответитьthanks man, amazing
ОтветитьMultiplying by Cos(mx) ?
I asked Fourier, he told me asked bPrP!