Sigma 18-50mm 2.8 vs The Sigma Primes (16, 30 & 56mm 1.4)

Sigma 18-50mm 2.8 vs The Sigma Primes (16, 30 & 56mm 1.4)

Stuart Rodwell

2 года назад

161,227 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

Harrison Martin
Harrison Martin - 13.11.2023 03:07

Facing this exact dilemma now and you helped me make up my mind. Good stuff. Great shots at the end too! Cheers.

Ответить
Cebrium
Cebrium - 10.11.2023 03:53

Most helpful video on the lens by far. You just gained a subscriber. Keep it up 😊

Ответить
Football Fever
Football Fever - 08.11.2023 08:44

I would any day sacrifice bokeh for the focal length versatility.

Ответить
jeeperscreepers7
jeeperscreepers7 - 02.11.2023 13:25

great video!

Ответить
RedCat
RedCat - 31.10.2023 12:41

Just the video I needed. I got my 16mm and 56mm and really needed the opinion of a pro on the 18-50mm vs these primes.

Ответить
Thomas Chin
Thomas Chin - 26.10.2023 18:18

Exactly what I'm looking for! Thanks!

Ответить
Ion D.
Ion D. - 26.10.2023 17:11

Spot on review! Thanks!

Ответить
Phantom
Phantom - 03.10.2023 03:18

Excellent comparison!

Ответить
Zahin Azham
Zahin Azham - 01.10.2023 13:50

Dang. The difference in bokeh is very noticeable

Ответить
Him Upadhyay
Him Upadhyay - 30.09.2023 10:25

Hey mate please help me which one will you suggest for photography and videography overall?? I can only buy one lens 😢

Ответить
lb_ projekt
lb_ projekt - 28.09.2023 14:56

Ok but you have to do the equivalence. It's obvious that an F1.4 is better than an f2.8. In full frame is the equivalent of 2.1 and 4.2!

Ответить
Harri pods
Harri pods - 26.09.2023 19:43

Love the primes but for the easy use I’ll go with 18-50 at a cost of those delicious bokeh

Ответить
Vin
Vin - 21.09.2023 17:55

I am more interested of her Jacket than the lens itself haha

Ответить
Marlon King
Marlon King - 14.09.2023 15:28

Thanks for the video, I've got 3 of the 4, only one I don't have is 56mm. Zoom is great for daily snaps. 16mm I use for my video work mainly and also good for out and about. 30mm I use for portrait more and it's a fun lens to have.
Nice to see the comparison on screen.

Ответить
Hold My beer
Hold My beer - 25.08.2023 17:08

The model doesn't seem happy!
Was the allowance not enough for her?😂😂

Ответить
Dylan Curcio
Dylan Curcio - 01.08.2023 21:39

Exactly the video I was looking for, thanks.

Ответить
ohhenry78
ohhenry78 - 30.07.2023 21:12

This is the exact comparison that I am looking for. It looks like not huge OOF difference at the wide end. It might be wise to spend money on getting the 90mm f/2 for more reach or 8mm f/3.5 for wider view. I wish Sigma come out with something for those ranges. Sigma 50-135mm f/2.8 and 8-16mm f/2.8 (I would be happy even at f/4 for a smaller zoom), where are they coming?

Ответить
Arc Media
Arc Media - 26.07.2023 17:31

Great comparison thanks 👍

Ответить
E36uk
E36uk - 25.07.2023 03:22

I've just found your channel, I love what you do! Keep it right on! I'm thinking of buying 6700 with Sigma duo 30 & 56 for my B-Roll trial-and-errors :)

Ответить
DRCHTCT
DRCHTCT - 21.07.2023 16:05

I think you sold me on the 18-50mm as my starter kit lens for the Fujifilm X-S10, and then most likely a 56mm prime down the road.

Ответить