Mitsubishi Pajero Sport GLS 4x4 2022 Review

Allahumma sholli ala sayyidina muhammad wa ala alihi wasohbihi wasallim lailaha illa anta subhanaka inni kuntu minaz zolimin ya ghoni ya mukni ya Allah

I like the old design better.

I have a GLS and have taken it off-road, carried 7 full size adults and honestly cannot fault its versatility. A great all round car. Yes lacking some tech that these newer cars offer, but for the price point this car can handle everything thrown at it.

Overall a good truck.

Yeah montero underchassis is old that its very much the same as the gen 2 pajero

tell me how I can't sleep there. all theses "reviewers" bubbles out their mouth and don't tell you this is a narrow car you won't be able to put things there

Som 1 dosnt like mitsubishi

clearly you don't like Mitsubishi, please never review again

This guy is the mid range SUV of car journos. He's not much to look at, and can't deliver what his more expensive counterparts offer. He's not as smart and has old bones. He's not innovative either, but he will get the job done.

This car is one of the most popular SUV here in Indonesia along with Toyota Fortuner and Honda CRV

I’m just wondering why they don’t have the Pajero Sport Dakar line like the one in Indonesia here in Australia

3 link independent rear suspension?

this looks like a MPV

every second word you said was OLD, if you don't like it just say so..... the engine is a rattler, I'm convinced you are not experienced enough to do reviews

It's a Mitsubishi. They have a great philosophy of making cars that just last with everything you need and nothing you don't. Great value, incredible warranty and it does what it says on the tin very well - 4WD station wagon. That engine/SuperSelect-II transmission has been around for years, battle-hardended and if maintained per spec will last a lifetime.

Please Mitsubishi bring back the 3.2 Pajero 😢😢

In my uncle 4x4 shop those Pajeros woould be rhere all the time. They are just not made for off road. But thanka for yhem..fords..gmc..he could make money. If o ky Toyota was offroad he would be a broke guy

although this SUV has an old ladder frame platform the sad thing is that it has a very advanced 4wd system, in fact I dont think it has a competitor that is as good... unless you go to a Land Rover or something prestige... that in itself makes a good argument for this over competing 4wds which have a much more primitive read less safe 4wd system...

the pajero models and outlander are two diffrent product lines, pajero was discountined 3 years ago :(

hopefully the nissan renault merger brings a new platform and tech

I think this reviewer is better sticking with city poser SUV’s and mummy wagons. Pajero is a decent 4x4 for the money, and those 2 things are it’s selling points…it’s a proper 4x4 and it’s a decent price. If you want something that not ‘an old girl’ then by all means spend 25% more.
No I don’t own one, but know people who do…it’s one of those vehicles reviewers don’t go for, but private owners love.

geez man if those old bones are still good then why the negativity

i think this guy was just being negative with ulterior motives lol. I’m not in the market for a 4wd but what ive seen of P sport they are much better than what this guy is letting on. It’s sad listening to review likes this.

Mitsubishi is a dying brand

So.....Buy a Rexton?

It's cheap on an aging platform...and it shows!!!

It's not a girly SUV, it's a real 4wd. Wakee wakee.

i drove it over 40k now since 2020 new model, it worthes the dollar u spent...

I own this model in the UK, like all of the moanstream media sites they approach these SUVs from "car review" i.e. the wrong perspective, the Pajero Sport is a 4x4 SUV not a car based AWD SUV..... Like with all things in life, there is a trade off, if you want a car that you can occasionally park on the grass....... then the Pajero Sport isn't probably for you. (PS I love mine)

Such an ugly car

Best to used old running gears thats proven ay 😀

It is the ugliest car in the segment by a mile, especially the rear, when are Mitsi updating it ?

I tried both PS, MU-X and new Everest recently, and I picked PS finally. MU-X is bigger and more cabin space, but the engine is noisy and shaky, just like driving a bus or .... you know ISUZU light truck.
New Everest is better in most aspect, but the 3rd row space is too small. I am 177cm, I can fit in PS's 3rd row easily with a decent knee room, but I cannot fit into Everest's 3rd row even I push 2nd row forward.

I've driven these as hire cars mostly on 1000 kilometre weekend trips away and they go along quite well. Not sure what the paddle flaps are for. The Super Select is really great. Lack of digital speedo was my only real gripe. Otherwise they are well built and have a reasonable price.

average and not to bad and ok is used consistently across the review - says all I need to know - get an Everest and be done.

This vehicle concept began as a Challenger not an Outlander which was the smaller crossover Mitsubishi and not at all capable off-road - editor needs to check their facts - I’d happily own a Pajero Sport or Toyota Fortuner instead of a conventional Pajero or Toyota Prado because the annoying swing out rear door is a deal breaker for me as it provides no overhead protection from the elements and impedes into space of car parked behind you

I like
this suv

“Mitsubishi’s reputation for uninspiring cabin design”……this reviews off to a great start👍👍

The pajero sport has always been (markerted in Australia as the Challanger) it was never an Outlander as reported .The transfer case has a center diff that can be in high range unlocked on high friction surfaces (from the Gen 2 Pajero) and the rear axle is not independant as reported (agian donanted from the Gen 2 Pajero). would be great if the reporter had half a clue what he was reporting about!

I wish they made a sedan version made in Adelaide with a 3.8 V6.

This review starts off very negative until the reviewer finally gets it. Yes, this is not a soft, quiet, car-like SUV.... it is a tough, rugged, reliable and very capable 4WD family truck.

When did it go to an independent rear end?

Why does Mitsubishi even bother?