Комментарии:
why is that stupid name? why not: spoon, noodle, cup, keyboard (four random things on my table)? I am telling you: two years from now you will have DRST to replace CQRS arguing how terrible CQRS is comparing to DRST. I am not jump on to something knowing it's going to be garbage in two years.
ОтветитьWhat is so much hype? We store events as history and only INSERT for better performance. insertion is suitable in normalized tables. Query portion is easier in denormalized format as a single select * form denormalized. The update from normalized -> denormalized happens only 1 time with kafka queues in the background. I don't think there is more to it. Thats how I would explain 1 line
Ответитьit is very interesting to understand this paradigm because help us not to create a complexity where do not need
ОтветитьClear and objective explanation. Thank you.
ОтветитьThe hand gesture is distracting and she talks too fast.
ОтветитьThe most clear explanations on CQRS & event sourcing I've ever watched/read, thank you!
ОтветитьWhat would happend if i have to change the event format and we have a lot of events gathered in the log?Thank you!
ОтветитьSo the system will eventually "inconsistent" as said read will not b possible right after "write", performance or segregation tradeoffs with data inconsistentcy... Apart from this why I would b interested from real world usecase POV that if user first add T shirt then delete T-shirt n add Pants to the cart n add one more Shirt n delete added Pants n added T-shirt again...ok we are writing these events to eventlog just to have record where user started???why I would b interested what was the system state at the time when this user started shopping??? What I want to achieve from that!??
ОтветитьShort and clear! Very good
ОтветитьGreat explanation, thanks
ОтветитьWhat is the benefit of CQRS?
ОтветитьMuch needed right now
Thank you 🙏