AI Workflows that Accelerate Production & Respect Artists' Process (GDC 2024)

Love this

i just know that when i train a lora on my own stuff then apply it onto a base or tuned model checkpoint and then show it to my mom, i cant find the gall to lie to her face and say i drew that. And once i start explaining how it was generated, thoughts of doubt, lack of interest and dismay enter her and my mind and in the end its just depression and slop.
Maybe this can help a totally ailing industry that is now resorted to churning out AAAA games that noone buys because they are uncreative and lack the human touch and understanding how to reach their audience.

This is great

Amazing job!!!

Thank you very much for your work!

Fantastic talk. I can tell that one of the goals of this talk was to refute naysayers and appease the creatives that have anxiety over AI. I can only hope that those people actually listen to you guys and adopt a more positive outlook on AI art as a creative tool.

Congratz! Can't wait for the future updates! This tool is very very potential!

Good to see this tech reaching to wider audience.

Can you make a video showing how to make AI generated images for print? So images that are not just 1024x1024 or expanded via canvas, but also have a resolution of e.g. 4096x4096 or other aspect ratio, but do not change the original image significantly?

You said it was open source but I see you need to pay to use it sorry confuse

It's realy a great Artist friendly tool, far ahead of the one button tools like midjurney.
Never the less the images depend strongly on the incorporated Ai models.
For Art, there's allready great stuff out there, but in my case we still search for models fulfilling our hopes for Architecture.
In some cases with smal rooms and all day private home architecture it's allready ok, but when it comes to big, international Architecture, you soon understand, that this is not yet realy trained to any moddeln. The degree of architectural style fine-tuning and detail quality still is unreachable apart of first ideas.

Never the less the tools invoke inkorporates to iteratively improve your Ai images are secound to none.
So invoke deserver a much bigger comunity. It's realy a well thougt user friendly concept

photography is going to kill art! who needs a portrait/landscape painter when you can just take a super accurate true to life photograph?
digital art is going to kill art! you kidz with your undo! and layers! and non-destructive workflows!
ai art is going to kill art!
...it's just another tool in the shed.

if you're very worried about having a career as an artist in the future... hey, in my day, "NFTs" were called "oil paintings"! Real Art! the original NFTs!

Artist should start adding clauses to contracts to disallow training AI on their stuff. Or better yet allowing Nightshading their stuff. Otherwise dude like that one will always prefer prompting Peter Mohrbacher style instead of hiring Peter Mohrbacher.

Do you support tiled diffusion, tiled vae and controlnet tile resample for a high resolution upscale with details?

What is the base model of this tool? I am guessing it's Stable Diffusion and in this case it's full of copyrighted works. Fine tuning is just another layer on top of it.

Naaaa... F×ck "AI" generated content. Using this tech to do your artwork for you just kills the integrity and respect for artists more in society. I mean, just look how unethically this bs was created. It won't be used as a tool for long, just a future replacement that also creates distrust within the art world.. I'll keep making my own projects without "AI" sludge, thank you.

In your talk, you mentioned that many of your clients believe it's acceptable to train AI using images from the internet, assuming it falls under fair use. This implies that any artwork can be used to train AI models without consent, as existing data scraping practices aren't addressed by the lack of specific clauses against it. Consequently, the only legal progress for artists now is to label new work explicitly as not for AI training on their portfolios and websites to ensure some level of legal protection. However, any of their artwork that has already been used to train AI models cannot be removed from datasets unless they individually opt out from every AI model that used their work without consent.

So-called artists demonising AI are the kind that put profits before art and their art reflects that. I'm an Artist that doesn't want commercial art to be a little exclusive club. I want the world to create art with ease and accuracy, and it all should be free. Thankyou Invoke for remaining opensource.

Enjoyed this interview a lot. Thanks for the constant updates and videos Hippy ! :)

This is can't be the gdc talk. I'm looking for but good anyone can point out the gdc talk about ai use to improve the production pipeline. Thanks.