Комментарии:
Very useful
ОтветитьHi, Danish electrician here. I just fitted two Hager RCBO’s on Friday and they both failed in the 5x test… one above 40mS on 0 degrees and the other on 180 degrees. This video is REALLY helpful. I use a Metrel Eurotest so I have to figure out how to change the parameters. Thank you again from your neighbor to the east. 🙂
ОтветитьCould it be fair to say most type A rcd are like this? I've noticed this with proteus type A rcd are just the same. Reading always being on the high side.
ОтветитьTanks for all this helpful information
ОтветитьPlease explain in Hindi language
ОтветитьGreat video, thanks
ОтветитьThanks guy's, i have been rattling my brains and wondering why i have been getting high readings! Hagar... sort your sh1t out!, its marked as a 30mA!
ОтветитьI can't explain how helpful you guys r to me. Thank u so much for your help and thorough explanation. Keep it up and I hope all the success for u
ОтветитьGreat video gents. Very helpful and clearly explained. Thank you
ОтветитьVery interesting. I’ve been using Kewtech and I’ve had the same issues. However recently started using fluke 1664 and reading on hager rcd/rcbo’s much lower. On fluke I test separately type AC and type A
ОтветитьQuestion, what if my tester is old and doesn't have a variable setting, so only 10ma, 30ma, 100ma or 300ma...the closest thing I can put through these A types will be 100ma or a new tester :(
I got 2 Hagar's that failed conventional 5x tests but my tester can't do 250ma
good to know, Thanks
ОтветитьInteresting video. A question re the Megger MFT used: If you change the test current to 50mA for the x5 test.... Do you have to change it back to 30mA afterwards so that next time you do a x1 it won't do it at 50mA? Or..... is the 50mA only stored for x5 type A?
ОтветитьSo, if your 30mA RCD fails at X5, get your Sharpie out and write over the 30mA printed on the front of the RCD, 50mA. Easy? Right?
As it says in the regs, it's all down to your engineering judgment, and no liability rest with them.
You've just spared anyone watching this endless scratching of their heads. Cheers lads.
ОтветитьHow do I set my Metrel 3152xc to 250mA please?
Ответитьvery good pick up a lot for from this is there any chance you could do some thing on erroneous connections and testing thank you
ОтветитьI have exactly the same tester as the one in the video, it has been recently calibrated but when testing these Hager type A RCD's. It trips the RCD when switched to VAR at x5 50mA but just says "TRP" on my screen and not an actual figure in milli seconds. Could my tester be faulty?
ОтветитьHi Gaz, long time no see. I was wondering if you had come across the new Hagar boards tripping the RCD on a no-trip ZS test using the Fluke 1654B mft? Had this quite a few times now.
ОтветитьHI Guy's can you give me a quick break down of the RCD test for 61009 ADC and ADA RCBO's
ОтветитьGreat video! Thank you very much!
ОтветитьI understand why Hager didn't want to do a recall but "if it doesn't pass at 5x just try 8x" doesn't inspire confidence. Hager operate in a market, and that market has established and codified practices.
ОтветитьQuestion for anyone please. Recently been working on a new build site where they have installed this type of Hager RCCB. On both RCCBs I'm getting tripping an half current at 1500ms. Recently calibrated machine etc. Also worked on a house on the same estate with exact same install and theirs isn't tripping. The property has been re tested by the electrical contractor who works for the building company and they said it's "fine", whereas I'm saying the device is over sensitive. Are there any specific parameters for tripping at half current for these specific devicess? Thanks all
Edit: kewtech kt64 , testing on type A
1/2 times the 500mA would also give you 250mA.
ОтветитьBS7671 table 3A states for a 30mA RCD/RCBO @ 150mA the max time is 40mS, I cant see the statement "manufacturers can make up their own times" anywhere?
ОтветитьWent through this today on my annual NICEIC visit, wish I'd have seen this video 1st to get extra brownie points
ОтветитьGreat video, thanks for the clarity 👍
ОтветитьWhen a RCBO trips, how can you tell if the trip was an overload or a leakage? At least when the rcd and mcb are separate, you know immediately what you are looking for.
Ответитьwhere should we prefer to use RCCB over RCBO. isnt RCBO the best, since it also provide OL protection
ОтветитьAnother great vid cheers
ОтветитьTotally just sorted out my head scratching as to why i'm getting higher trip times...well done guys..great vid..keep em coming and thankyou
Ответитьcheers guys
ОтветитьWhat if your meter wont test to 250ma?
ОтветитьIf you perform the same tests with the setting for AC you'll get much better results. The meters are creating different types of fault currents, depending on which type of test you perform. But it's good to always test the worst case scenario. If you have an AC fault the type A RCDs will react as fast as the old AC only RCDs.
ОтветитьSounds like a fudge to get a pass to me. Come on Hager it’s a 30mA device not a 50mA.
ОтветитьWould be helpful if Hager actually had product literature for the Hager RCCB CD285U (100A 30mA type A RCD), and included this guidance. Apparently there is "no Data on the CD285U and they are not selling it as a spare part". This comment was from their tech support on the 12/4/19
ОтветитьIs it a good idea to put the stickers on the actual breakers. If they need to be changed - the stickers are going to either go with the defective breaker / try to be scraped off / or new circuit label be printed. Why no just put the labels below each breaker ?
ОтветитьNice one Gaz and Marcus, really useful information. 👍
ОтветитьGreat video as always 👍
ОтветитьI rarely see Hager and have never fitted them. The way those breakers line up with the front cover isn't selling it to me either. Having said that, having space for labels on the MCB's does look useful - my usual solution to keep track when the board cover is off is to write the circuit number on the upper front of the breaker, so it's behind the cover when it is fitted. My labelling of the front panel would always show the circuit number
ОтветитьSounds like a bit of a cop out on Hager's part... If our RCD's don't operate within the prescribed times then keep testing at a greater residual current until it does.
ОтветитьThanks guys for this information, as you say it will be useful as a back up test in the event you want extra reassurance from borderline results at 30mA (am I right I guessing they are using 50mA, as electrical shocks at 50mA or higher can be fatal - I might be wrong in thinking that is the reason for the figure they are using, just the 50mA sticks in my head from my EAL/LV2 book p36). Also great video in showing how to adapt the Megger for variations to the mA settings. Love the testing advice videos 👍
ОтветитьAnother excellent & really informative video, thanks Gaz & Marcus.
ОтветитьI have no comprehension what they are on about
ОтветитьGenuinely informative guys 👍
ОтветитьCan almost imagine the Hager board room meeting discussing their new type A rcds not always meeting additional protection disconnection times and the one sneaky bastard finding that loop hole allowing 250mA to be the test trip current value. My tester for one cannot do a 250mA test and measure the trip time.
ОтветитьWhat comment did you put (if any) on your paperwork to indicate the test parameters for anyone coming to test in the future?
ОтветитьBs7671 regulation 415.1 states that to comply with additional protection an rcd must be tested at 5xI delta n .
The rcd must be rated at 30mA and must trip within 40ms.
Therefore this is what's commonly known as fudging the test results.