TELESCOPIC, SEGMENTED, & JACKETED APFSDS vs SLOPED ARMOUR | Unique APFSDS Vol. 5

TELESCOPIC, SEGMENTED, & JACKETED APFSDS vs SLOPED ARMOUR | Unique APFSDS Vol. 5

SY Simulations

2 года назад

564,546 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

SY Simulations
SY Simulations - 27.08.2021 17:11

These designs will be tested against ERA in the near future...

Ответить
bestamerica
bestamerica - 28.08.2023 04:27

'
where is the powerful TNT inside then bullet hit the tank and BANG boooom

Ответить
Starbodektrek
Starbodektrek - 25.07.2023 07:32

dont believe...

Ответить
Bernie Gran
Bernie Gran - 21.07.2023 13:46

No way that the telescopic sleeve will retain its shape when hitting sloped surfaces, it will snap in two.

Ответить
Ivan55
Ivan55 - 06.06.2023 16:10

I wonder how effective is telescoping APFSDS against heavy ERA such as Kontakt/Relikt; from what I've read, M829A3+ relies on some sort of "two part" isolation to deal with the ERA first so the rear remains less affected.

Ответить
Florian Fuchs
Florian Fuchs - 23.05.2023 10:52

How do telescopic APFSDS prevent the core from sliding forward directly on impact?

Ответить
Yoonseong Do
Yoonseong Do - 11.04.2023 06:46

Telescoping one looks awesome and performs awesome!

Ответить
Hot Metal Knives HMK
Hot Metal Knives HMK - 05.03.2023 18:17

the telescoping one is super sexzy

Ответить
7249xxl
7249xxl - 26.02.2023 22:27

Now combine al 3

Ответить
Kam
Kam - 19.02.2023 12:00

So far in all tests i'v seen it seems that backwards telescoping apfsds gives a massive increse in penetration whit no downside, if it is so, then why is it not in use? Or is there a missing flaw i am not seeing?

Ответить
michael mcclain
michael mcclain - 12.02.2023 08:53

conventional explosive propellants top out around 1800-1850m/sec for these kinds of sabot projectiles. That's about Mach 5.5. 2000+ is around Mach 6, which is verging on railgun territory.
The fastest rifle rounds hit around 1400m/sec, or a bit above Mach 4.

Ответить
Wawa Weewa
Wawa Weewa - 09.02.2023 13:31

Instead of telescoping All the way back test it with only 1/3rd extension and compare,

Ответить
ZochI _
ZochI _ - 09.02.2023 01:51

Bless you

Ответить
Jakob Max
Jakob Max - 04.02.2023 18:54

If a proper way to lets apfsds telescope gets developed, it will be and absolute game changer.

Ответить
Fri3ndlyF3llow Crafter
Fri3ndlyF3llow Crafter - 01.02.2023 20:18

what if you put tungsten rod with thermite suck to it kinda like a welding rod.. lol

Ответить
Denver Stjernström Falk
Denver Stjernström Falk - 16.01.2023 12:21

whats the software called?

Ответить
Toggaf reggin
Toggaf reggin - 16.01.2023 06:35

Segmented has skill issue

Ответить
Ilmari
Ilmari - 15.01.2023 04:36

@draksionar mentioned this before but I have a step further into the theory. Flip the segments + split them into 3-4 pieces. This would create a row of tungsten "scoops"

Ответить
Michael H
Michael H - 27.12.2022 20:16

How does the telescopic work? Wouldn't the telescopic one, untelescope itself at impact?

Ответить
Bick Boose
Bick Boose - 23.12.2022 14:15

Meanwhile in Warthunder:
Hit Hit Hit Hit

Ответить
Евгений Лимонов
Евгений Лимонов - 23.12.2022 06:51

Так вот куда уходит мой снаряд, когда я не пробиваю танк в Вар Тандер

Ответить
Plazmeer
Plazmeer - 15.12.2022 13:26

what software is this?

Ответить
arendelle_ok87
arendelle_ok87 - 04.12.2022 18:24

Can u simulate a amx foch ac48 ?

Ответить
Scott Searle
Scott Searle - 27.11.2022 17:16

Boing round does best

Ответить
AGWittmann
AGWittmann - 23.11.2022 22:58

Do you know, why the trailing telescopic penetrator doesnt get retracted again, when it hits the target?

Ответить
marcvin
marcvin - 23.11.2022 15:42

Game name

Ответить
Zeek C.
Zeek C. - 23.11.2022 02:08

I have absolutely no idea what's going on, but I like to see tanks blow shit up.

Ответить
just SMOK
just SMOK - 14.11.2022 10:24

in what program he makes this simulations ?

Ответить
Triparadox C.
Triparadox C. - 08.11.2022 08:31

Meanwhile WT: bounce

Ответить
S1nwar
S1nwar - 09.10.2022 19:19

how does the empty tube of the telescopic remove the central mass of the armor it hits so efficiently?

Ответить
IDontKnow
IDontKnow - 30.09.2022 05:45

Thanks for this! Finally understand why I've been having so much trouble with my segmented shells. Next time I'm shelling out for the telescoping APFSDS, worth every penny.

Ответить
Per Nykvist
Per Nykvist - 23.09.2022 08:19

Why not use Uran?

Ответить
hackedoge
hackedoge - 08.09.2022 19:05

poor armor😭😭😭😭

Ответить
Danyon Swordfyre
Danyon Swordfyre - 28.07.2022 19:32

Funny how these simulations have 0 deflection, as if God himself was pushing it through the armor, hahaha

Ответить
Jonathan Steven
Jonathan Steven - 21.06.2022 22:08

Can anybody kindly tell me examples of those rounds ? Like what type are M829A-series ?

What about DM-series ? Etc.

Ответить
ConfusedHelmut423
ConfusedHelmut423 - 21.06.2022 04:41

Try this against a T-34 please

Ответить
Mike
Mike - 18.06.2022 06:50

I don't think your model for the telescopic penetrator is even remotely close to correct.

Ответить
txgtofan
txgtofan - 21.05.2022 19:16

The frontal sloped armor above the driver of the Abrams is 82.5°.

Ответить
Artur Scherbakov
Artur Scherbakov - 19.05.2022 19:35

What about ricochet?

Ответить
TramVanDam
TramVanDam - 18.05.2022 05:33

I have this nutty idea of putting a small shaped charge with a deep narrow cone at the end of one of these penetrators that would detonate just before impact to make a "pre drilled hole" for the main penetrator.

Ответить
Godly Monkey
Godly Monkey - 17.05.2022 00:02

What if we just make a big ass HE round (more than 40 kilos of HE something that is equivalent to 80-200 kg of tnt atleast) that goes 3000+ m/s and just lob that at tanks and everything else

Ответить
Ivan Stepanovic
Ivan Stepanovic - 16.05.2022 23:44

How could you stop the telescopic penetrators to fold back in after the initial impact?

Ответить
Hey DUDES
Hey DUDES - 15.05.2022 22:22

Why doesn’t
the apfsds shell normalize like a normal ap shell would

Ответить
Антоша
Антоша - 15.05.2022 21:54

Best Russian apfsds vs m1 Abrams turret front

Ответить
Manu Leppäkangas
Manu Leppäkangas - 15.05.2022 20:31

Tungsten mines:

Ответить
Nikita Tarsov
Nikita Tarsov - 30.04.2022 10:43

I don't get why the telescopic model was consuming nearly the same amount or armor while having way less resistance - even if i take that the extended structure will not break its angle for having a very weak spot and a angled force throught ehresistance of sloped armor.

Ответить
casey b
casey b - 17.04.2022 23:39

pretty sure the telescoping apfsds would start tumbling, even with fin stabilization due to the round becoming so back heavy.

Ответить
Volatile
Volatile - 09.04.2022 20:49

Wouldn't the inertia of the slender core on the telescoping projectile cause it to fold back into the sleeve on impact?

Ответить
Jay1341
Jay1341 - 06.04.2022 14:20

Dont worry, with this new segmented APDFS, its only a matter of time before APDFSHE is created by adding a fuze to the front tip of the APDFS round leading to the core of the dart which contains HE filler and then... boom

Ответить