Комментарии:
These designs will be tested against ERA in the near future...
Ответить'
where is the powerful TNT inside then bullet hit the tank and BANG boooom
dont believe...
ОтветитьNo way that the telescopic sleeve will retain its shape when hitting sloped surfaces, it will snap in two.
ОтветитьI wonder how effective is telescoping APFSDS against heavy ERA such as Kontakt/Relikt; from what I've read, M829A3+ relies on some sort of "two part" isolation to deal with the ERA first so the rear remains less affected.
ОтветитьHow do telescopic APFSDS prevent the core from sliding forward directly on impact?
ОтветитьTelescoping one looks awesome and performs awesome!
Ответитьthe telescoping one is super sexzy
ОтветитьNow combine al 3
ОтветитьSo far in all tests i'v seen it seems that backwards telescoping apfsds gives a massive increse in penetration whit no downside, if it is so, then why is it not in use? Or is there a missing flaw i am not seeing?
Ответитьconventional explosive propellants top out around 1800-1850m/sec for these kinds of sabot projectiles. That's about Mach 5.5. 2000+ is around Mach 6, which is verging on railgun territory.
The fastest rifle rounds hit around 1400m/sec, or a bit above Mach 4.
Instead of telescoping All the way back test it with only 1/3rd extension and compare,
ОтветитьBless you
ОтветитьIf a proper way to lets apfsds telescope gets developed, it will be and absolute game changer.
Ответитьwhat if you put tungsten rod with thermite suck to it kinda like a welding rod.. lol
Ответитьwhats the software called?
ОтветитьSegmented has skill issue
Ответить@draksionar mentioned this before but I have a step further into the theory. Flip the segments + split them into 3-4 pieces. This would create a row of tungsten "scoops"
ОтветитьHow does the telescopic work? Wouldn't the telescopic one, untelescope itself at impact?
ОтветитьMeanwhile in Warthunder:
Hit Hit Hit Hit
Так вот куда уходит мой снаряд, когда я не пробиваю танк в Вар Тандер
Ответитьwhat software is this?
ОтветитьCan u simulate a amx foch ac48 ?
ОтветитьBoing round does best
ОтветитьDo you know, why the trailing telescopic penetrator doesnt get retracted again, when it hits the target?
ОтветитьGame name
ОтветитьI have absolutely no idea what's going on, but I like to see tanks blow shit up.
Ответитьin what program he makes this simulations ?
ОтветитьMeanwhile WT: bounce
Ответитьhow does the empty tube of the telescopic remove the central mass of the armor it hits so efficiently?
ОтветитьThanks for this! Finally understand why I've been having so much trouble with my segmented shells. Next time I'm shelling out for the telescoping APFSDS, worth every penny.
ОтветитьWhy not use Uran?
Ответитьpoor armor😭😭😭😭
ОтветитьFunny how these simulations have 0 deflection, as if God himself was pushing it through the armor, hahaha
ОтветитьCan anybody kindly tell me examples of those rounds ? Like what type are M829A-series ?
What about DM-series ? Etc.
Try this against a T-34 please
ОтветитьI don't think your model for the telescopic penetrator is even remotely close to correct.
ОтветитьThe frontal sloped armor above the driver of the Abrams is 82.5°.
ОтветитьWhat about ricochet?
ОтветитьI have this nutty idea of putting a small shaped charge with a deep narrow cone at the end of one of these penetrators that would detonate just before impact to make a "pre drilled hole" for the main penetrator.
ОтветитьWhat if we just make a big ass HE round (more than 40 kilos of HE something that is equivalent to 80-200 kg of tnt atleast) that goes 3000+ m/s and just lob that at tanks and everything else
ОтветитьHow could you stop the telescopic penetrators to fold back in after the initial impact?
ОтветитьWhy doesn’t
the apfsds shell normalize like a normal ap shell would
Best Russian apfsds vs m1 Abrams turret front
ОтветитьTungsten mines:
ОтветитьI don't get why the telescopic model was consuming nearly the same amount or armor while having way less resistance - even if i take that the extended structure will not break its angle for having a very weak spot and a angled force throught ehresistance of sloped armor.
Ответитьpretty sure the telescoping apfsds would start tumbling, even with fin stabilization due to the round becoming so back heavy.
ОтветитьWouldn't the inertia of the slender core on the telescoping projectile cause it to fold back into the sleeve on impact?
ОтветитьDont worry, with this new segmented APDFS, its only a matter of time before APDFSHE is created by adding a fuze to the front tip of the APDFS round leading to the core of the dart which contains HE filler and then... boom
Ответить