The Iceberg of Quantum Physics Explained

The Iceberg of Quantum Physics Explained

Sciencephile the AI

3 года назад

1,377,394 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@zzzbladepookie
@zzzbladepookie - 26.01.2024 13:00

Juet chilling as your average middle schooler watching this with no knowledge about quantum🧍‍♀️

Ответить
@maktham2006
@maktham2006 - 23.01.2024 19:22

The last seconds are super creative because the weirdest things will stay unknown, not even with IQ 1000

Ответить
@ethan_exxplores
@ethan_exxplores - 19.01.2024 15:41

Some dudes just decided to sit in a lab thinking their lives away to make these theories. Like go touch some grass guys

Ответить
@Notsogoodguitarguy
@Notsogoodguitarguy - 16.01.2024 15:01

By the way, wasn't the explanation for Heisenberg's uncertainty principle fairly simple once you think about it?

So, you can either know the position or the momentum of a quantum particle, but not both. Why is that?

Position - to observe the position of a particle, you have to be able to actually "see" it. That means, it has to be interacted with by some force - e.g. a photon bouncing off of the quantum particle and reflecting back to our receptacle that can measure it, whether it's our eyes, a camera or whatever. And even though the force of a photon is absolutely minuscule, it's not 0. And, as soon as a photon hits the particle, you've already changed it's momentum. So you can't really know what momentum it had before.

Ответить
@Preaplanes
@Preaplanes - 25.12.2023 21:30

I'm not a physicist, I'm just a nerd, and I can safely say I heard of the entire iceberg (not including the seeming joke ones at the bottom).
Yes, even the quantum healing bit. I didn't say I bought all of it. I've heard some pretty convincing holes pokes in string theory too so I'm skeptical about that one.

Ответить
@user-kr9sh3cr1o
@user-kr9sh3cr1o - 24.12.2023 21:32

Nine lives poor kitties

Ответить
@Anonymous-uz4pg
@Anonymous-uz4pg - 08.12.2023 11:28

I wish I was smarter 😭

Ответить
@DeezNuts-kl2te
@DeezNuts-kl2te - 02.12.2023 09:22

Eggheads turned sciencephile AI off

Ответить
@Kitzoa7
@Kitzoa7 - 29.11.2023 18:24

Why couldn’t they use a human instead of a cat they are just mean 😢

Ответить
@crushtion
@crushtion - 29.11.2023 06:28

With quantum entanglement, could you achieve faster than light communication by the fact that when one particle is measured, the other one then collapses its superposition and use this as sort of an 'indicator'. For example, have a pairs of entangle particles separated across two spaceships in space. The first spaceship can signal when its reached its destination by measuring their particle and forcing both particles to collapse, the second spaceship could see that their particle has collapsed and knows that the other spaceship has reached its destination. They have transmitted information regardless of whether the particle was measured to have a up or down spin, but just with the fact that it is no longer in a superposition. You could go further can send messages by having hundreds of pairs of particles where each pair corresponds to 1's and 0's and transmit binary messages.

You can throw all this out the window if its impossible to tell if an entangled particle has collapsed without measuring it first. Kinda like looking at someone to see if they are looking at you only to see that they see you looking at them and you don't know if they looked at you first or they looked a you because you looked at them just then.

Ответить
@techexcursion2289
@techexcursion2289 - 29.11.2023 02:25

If each time a superposition is broken, another parallel universe is created; Won't at some point in space-time the servers crash ?

Ответить
@micolashhostofthecircus
@micolashhostofthecircus - 28.11.2023 02:18

I don’t understand half of the things I’m listening. I love quantum physics

Ответить
@NarutoUzumaki-rl5yl
@NarutoUzumaki-rl5yl - 22.11.2023 20:36

Perfect timing. Right as the video said “and now to the deep stuff” an ad played saying “how many subscriptions are you paying for”

Ответить
@user-dq5ri8je5y
@user-dq5ri8je5y - 19.11.2023 16:53

I love how the ominous music came along as soon as string theory came up

Ответить
@Red-zd4xm
@Red-zd4xm - 18.11.2023 02:13

Observers effect.
So you're saying when i see it its 2 when i don't its more? HUH?

Ответить
@JobeWanKenobi
@JobeWanKenobi - 09.11.2023 14:20

So in short the observer effect is like how theres no food in your fridge until your mum looks

Ответить
@cptredhorse5156
@cptredhorse5156 - 29.10.2023 14:34

Love that it’s casually mentioned that light LITERALLY BEHAVES DIFFERENTLY depending on whether you’re looking at it or not, like that’s not one of the most mind-bending things to learn about

Ответить
@Ryujinie
@Ryujinie - 25.10.2023 19:39

Does that mean i was super interested in what i called physics was actually quantum physics!?

Ответить
@James_3000
@James_3000 - 24.10.2023 02:26

the observer effect somehow tells me that our consciousness has a much bigger meaning in the universe than just atoms interacting, like there must be something big going on if a human literally just looking at a quantum particle makes it do something

Ответить
@JundArbiter
@JundArbiter - 18.10.2023 00:25

Feinmann is the quintessential science douche and if he wasnt hot we wouldn't be doing his stupid diagrams

Ответить
@hrabathor
@hrabathor - 16.10.2023 23:00

I am no expert on quantum physics, but is not the Heisenberg principle stating that you could not observe the STATE of the universe or the quantum object, like you could mesure the momentum and position, but the point is, you change one or the other with the measurement, so you could not obtain those 2 information about the object from the same timestamp, AKA we could not observe the whole state vector, right?

Ответить
@BaphomentIsAwsome666
@BaphomentIsAwsome666 - 15.10.2023 08:37

I think its funny how people are fine with infinite mulitverse but have a hard stop at Consciousness.

Ответить
@markferguson5924
@markferguson5924 - 07.10.2023 19:15

Great stuff. Scientists warry of woo woo interpretations about consciousness now emphasize that it's about the information existing (e.g. right or left slit), that the collapse occures even without a conscious observer as long as the info physically exists. Assuming the computer holding the left-right data file itself isn't conscious ... well, this is awkward.

Ответить
@realhuman5688
@realhuman5688 - 01.10.2023 05:59

To me, parallel universes seem like a continuation of the simulation theory.

If you were running a universe scale simulation and you wanted to see all possibilities of a particular interaction, then wouldn't you want to be able to see every single possibility?

I'm just thinking out loud here.

Ответить
@Muhammad80008
@Muhammad80008 - 28.09.2023 22:51

Interesting video :)

Ответить
@mwwah
@mwwah - 17.09.2023 12:58

i feel like a genius for already knowing all these theories while simultaneously worrying about all my pending work lol

Ответить
@PvtSchlock
@PvtSchlock - 15.09.2023 05:04

Hold on just a second, is this to imply that my $120 mail away course to become a certified quantum mechanic wasn't actually worth the cash? The University of Science is highly respected isn't it?

Ответить
@flooshlikescheese9944
@flooshlikescheese9944 - 13.09.2023 18:03

Being aware of everything you do sucks....
Like when I'm about to do move my hand, i think of me moving my hand knowing the exact place where ill put my hand it just puts me into a state of reflection and makes me late for everything

Ответить
@MurderCube
@MurderCube - 13.09.2023 07:33

I would love a more detailed explanation of the observer effect

Ответить
@DaveL04591
@DaveL04591 - 02.09.2023 16:42

I got one right here cz I was just thinking about this in the video. If the "observer" is the thing that required what makes up matter(quantums and stuff) stable, then the universe will be all chaos before the first life that can detect anything was born. However, if the entire universe was to be in that chaos in the first place, then how is it possible that life will be born out of it because life requires stability to form.

Ответить
@adilbougma3114
@adilbougma3114 - 01.09.2023 00:25

I just hope i can a quantum computer 😂😂😂 i don't need to understand how the universe work i just need to live in it the best way possible 😂😂

Ответить
@defnotfurry
@defnotfurry - 25.08.2023 07:27

petition to make a video explaining quantum chicken nuggets

Ответить
@flippyjunior1267
@flippyjunior1267 - 24.08.2023 20:02

the space in the deep water after the iceberg is distorted thus creating the possibility of there beeing infinte more crazy ideas about the universe

Ответить
@drippyd8131
@drippyd8131 - 15.08.2023 20:12

Funny thing is we will never truly know which is why GOD (spirit) wants to explore every single timeline hence why we create what we envision. We really are being controlled but we can still make the most of it.

Ответить
@SL4US
@SL4US - 15.08.2023 14:18

What if once we uncover all the secrets of the universe, it destroys itself only to be recreated more nonsensical than before. What if this has already happened countless of times

Ответить
@SL4US
@SL4US - 15.08.2023 14:12

My basic understanding of quantum physics made me believe its just some supreme force or being that trolls us for shxts and giggles

Ответить
@daphnesawyer8555
@daphnesawyer8555 - 15.08.2023 07:27

Honestly how dare you make fun of deepak chopra….giving JEALOUSY

Ответить
@SzymonWypcho
@SzymonWypcho - 14.08.2023 20:16

So if I somehow stop an electron what are the chances that the world ends because there's only one

Ответить
@ondrejletal8657
@ondrejletal8657 - 13.08.2023 02:54

This is the best video i have ever watched

Ответить
@user-hs8sf3ir9n
@user-hs8sf3ir9n - 11.08.2023 02:44

wtf is this shit

Ответить
@ManicCandice
@ManicCandice - 03.08.2023 08:28

Yesssss

Ответить
@aryamanmadan2569
@aryamanmadan2569 - 03.08.2023 06:22

Ever heard of the quantum penis? Theory has it that guys who don't go to the gym have it and that it has a speed 3 times that of sound and screams "no" when u give it a protein shake

Ответить
@alikaykhaei
@alikaykhaei - 26.07.2023 23:16

this video is pissing me off its fantastic its just i dont get it and im not focusing and researching about topics in the vid

Ответить
@screenwriterjohn
@screenwriterjohn - 26.07.2023 09:25

Quantum mechanics is the Satan science.

Ответить
@AdrianBts
@AdrianBts - 16.07.2023 08:52

Are you 26?

Ответить
@terra4616
@terra4616 - 08.07.2023 02:20

What are we taking about again?

Ответить