Комментарии:
amazon has a lot more web question not because its popular and easy but because its difficult and service names makes no sense.
gcp is just plain simple.
so, i'm a noob on tecnology so which it would be the best option ?
ОтветитьCrap. No real comparison. More of just data. I was hoping to see projects compared.
ОтветитьVery informative. This is useful cloud comparison video. good job.
ОтветитьBro your audio is F*cked , its too quiet ✌
ОтветитьTHANK YOU for making a USEFUL cloud comparison video. Very informative. So many of these videos are padded with CRAP. Good job.
ОтветитьAzure>Everything
Ответитьis googls cloud even in the conversation? I barely see any job advert that looks for it
ОтветитьNice overview. Thanks!
ОтветитьThanks for the great overview
ОтветитьVery well explained from multiple perspectives, thank you.
ОтветитьAmazingly clear explanation. Thank you!
ОтветитьVery useful comparison... Loved the strategies suggested in last part of how to make a choice.
ОтветитьAzure is straight forward, everything is self explanatory compared to AWS. anyone can use it anytime
ОтветитьA nice comparison helped me understanding the path I chose for my career in Azure. Thanks
ОтветитьThis is very explanatory and an eye opener. I understand that the Kubernetes engine give a lot of advantages to GCP, no wonder a few organizations are more comfortable with with them. However the opportunities in AWS is huge, and Microsoft understanding of Enterprise softwares cannot be overemphasized. Well done team A Cloud Guru. Any subscription discount available to take the GCP & Azure training with you?
Ответитьare there free versions/alternatives available of those?
ОтветитьExcellent video. Thank for the info.
ОтветитьGood content!, You just got a new subscriber.
ОтветитьHow about the licensing models? Great video and content though !
ОтветитьHow about the licensing models? Great video and content though !
ОтветитьI was looking for the contents like this! I hit the subscribe button thanks!
ОтветитьAmazing content! Thanks!
ОтветитьUseful video. Thanks!
ОтветитьName one service which was close on GCP, not by Google, because this are two different selling models for different customers. And talking about past, or how is on which platform is waste of time, because if Netflix would selecting cloud provider today, they could select different. For me most important are what service they giving and if others have alternatives. AWS S3 and Google Storage, similar, but Google BigQuery, Firebase, and many more?
Ответить @A Cloud Guru what about AZ-303 & AZ-304 courses, which are much more outdated than AZ-400, & AZ-500 when are you planning to update AZ-303 & AZ-304 courses?
ОтветитьWhy is the azure courses in a cloud guru/linux academy so very outdated? Like the AZ-400, AZ-500, AZ-303 & AZ-304 courses, why doesn't reflect the recent changes on the exams. Is a cloud guru/linux academy just more focus on aws? Tnanks
ОтветитьMulti cloud is the way to go.
ОтветитьNice Summary. Thx!
Ответитьthe order of clouds is aws > gcp > azure
ОтветитьI am a windows admin so, I just love Azure... I also think many customer who has existing windows environment would prefer to go to Azure as it is also Microsoft managed product...
ОтветитьNice overview. Although I understand (and somewhat agree with) your advice to stick with a single provider, I missed the obvious conclusion: finding a “common denominator” for going cross-cloud is really hard. Their architectures are so incompatible that even “generic” tools like packer and terraform have completely different keywords in use when writing the configuration. A packer config for building an image in GCE is useless when you try to do the same on AWS, apart from the actual scripting inside the VM. Tools that do try have to restrict themselves in what you can tweak, to the point of uselessness, unless provided with lots of separate (cloud-specific) configuration.
Ответитьthis is useful content thanks
ОтветитьAs a new-ish cloud person, this is such useful content!
Ответить