Rantzerker 70: "Reasonable" Questions for Anti-SJWs w/TL;DR

Men will always will be rulers of woman no debate

So...TL;DR gets a lot of: 'Too long, didn't watch?'

The funny thing is, somewhere around 80% of the people who react to this all tell Steve to go fuck himself without answering him. Not saying it isn't deserved, it's just kinda funny

LMAO they deleted their video

People who are standing up for individuality are individuals. People who are standing up for collectivism are a collective. Condemning all men on behalf of all women is a collectivist argument. If that is the argument that you are making then, yes, it is fair to deal with the weakest link in the collective.

No, don't work with feminist on male mental health issues. They have a fundamental failure in seeing men as human and think that male issues are really women's issues and take over from the people who are actually hurting. This is inviting them to mentally and emotionally abuse men who are in need of help. If a given feminist wants to truly help men on these issues, she needs to drop the feminist crap while engaged in these activities to be of an use. To put men's issues in a video trying to claim feminism is being maligned is prove positive that it is just an excuse to attack men who are hurting. If feminist where seriously interested in working towards a solution to these problems THEY need to be the ones who are willing to set their ideology aside to do it. How can feminism be for men to while looking at a man who is in pain and claim it's their own fault because of other men's actions TO SUPPORT FEMINISM AND WOMEN?

I can't argue against the strongest 'feminist' argument, I agree with Christina Hoff Summers!?!

First feminist aren't a collective and the ones who think they are only have the one collectivist position. Why do feminists put people like Anita Sarkisian on a pedestal instead of someone like Liana K who could actually present a robust argument? Why do feminists lead with the weak argument?

What did cuck mean before it's current usage? As opposed to using words like Nazi and forgetting what THAT word means.

YAWN

Guys. Guys.
You should engage some robust reasonable questions

The only thing worse than SJWs is fake-woke furries.

Snake Plisskenist? Was that the name? Trying to search for his stuff.

You can have equal opportunity with freedom of choice or equal results with freedom of choice. If you have equal results then you must remove the consequences of the choices of individuals. There are many reasons that equal results regardless of choices is a bad idea and unfair.

Edited to make portions of text bold text and add the following

The logical fallacies and hypocrisy in the original video is just staggering especially if you consider the questions as a group.

That male choice BS is not equality. A woman has to go through abortion which can be a very hard decision a man abandoning a child an letting other men to pay for it in their taxes is nothing comparable. If a man and a woman have a child both are responsible for it. If they do not have, neither is. This has nothing to do with abortion.

I love when people try and counter one of my OPINIONS, that I state is an OPINION, with "Citation needed!"

An argument grounded in feminist theory being considered robust is a contradiction. Feminist theory refuses challenges to its assumptions and therefore cannot ever be robust. That is also why feminism IS a monolith. By necessity it is based in feminist theory.

Starting to get abit tired of you acting like the crimes of feminism rest on each and every feminists shoulder, as though they can be called a hypocrite for doing something you lack evidence they do beyond the fact they're feminists.
I get they do it, and you're not being as bad, but that's no defence. Especially when you condemn them for being collectivist.
Like the first bit i just thought you made a mistake or were making logical leaps without clueing us in but after so much it became apparent it wasnt just a result of carelessness with how you say things

Don't forget Yorik & Stacy King, she use a skull too

Karen didn't make it into their little intro.. but Dusty Smith did? WTF.

You know that thing they say about men questioning women to see if they're actual comic book or marvel/dc fans? Yeah, well, I'm a male, and a female was one that did such a test on me, not the other way around.

I failed it.

I almost wonder if I was the man in the "MRA" video.

I hate these condecending asshats.

For the love of god, Karen, pleae let the full question play out before turning on your mic and making that horrible echo.

right?right?right?right?right?
Karen you sound like Cenk

The funniest thing to me I think is how I think it was 2 (possibly more, i would need to look at it again) of them basically asked why anti-sjws go after small things and not address important feminist issues. I mean this was supposed to be their chance to ask a specific important question for people to answer but instead it is like they are saying, "I cannot think of anything important so go look up someone better than me".

What is the strongest feminist argument? Isn't this determination entirely subjective?

Oh my god the cringe, these people actually think they're funny. Sjws are anti-humour.

I feel like its worth mentioning that for that "why does trigglypuff represent feminists but this random guy doesn't represent MRAs?" question that trigglypuff is in an auditorium full of feminists who are ALL there acting the same way, chanting and disrupting; and MRA(?) guy is just one dude. it kind of makes the whole "just a few radicals" line seem a little dishonest when its an entire fucking room full. If this group of feminists aren't the "real" ones, then who is?

I hope you guys respond to the rest of this.

Camille Paglia is the one that said, and I paraphrase, that a women dresses half naked and gets drunk at a frat party is asking for it, or looking for it, or wanting it, and should not be surprised if something happens.....

But lets be clear, at least under the Soviet Union as they practiced Marxism, they supported where they could having the woman stay at home to take care of the kids :)

here is something to think about.....men totally controlled Nazi Germany, the monster nation, but all or almost all of those men were married to women who fully supported them!

I don't oppose feminism, at least as defined by the women who fought for the right to vote and get an education!

"if its social or biological, and they try to shut down the entire argument".....we'll open up a Pandora's box of stuff they do not want to deal with.

I'm an FDR type liberal and I'm not 'rightwing' and I agree with these people talking here about SJW crap and the crap they spew. keep up the good work guys!

What happened to Snake?