Комментарии:
Honest to god when it’s zoomed out the fsr looks better but up close dlss is king but I actually like the over sharpened clean look fsr places on distant object but up close the dlss stomps it I wish we could blend all the upscalers together and make one amazing system that’s open source and everyone is level that would be best for consumers then we choose based on the best morals of a company and not their proprietary tech but I know that’s not how it works or would it be good in the long run why innovate at that point but ai upscaling really is a game changer we can getperformance that used to require hundreds of watts to provide for a tiny power budget
ОтветитьNecesito otros lentes para prestar atención a eso. 😅
ОтветитьThen fsr 3 came😂
ОтветитьDLSS Quality (66% scaling) has been found to have better image quality than FSR “Native”. That alone should tell you how bad FSR is.
DLAA is on another level. It’s unfortunate that you’re all too poor to enjoy it.
I don't see any difference from my phone resolution 720p😢
ОтветитьNever touching green
ОтветитьAmd looks more detailed while the nvidia looks like smoothed out
Play-doh
One of the things I enjoy most is zooming 400% and then playing a game, it really enhances the immersion
ОтветитьLet me pay an overpriced gpu that has a technology that boost fps only in certain games instead of buying a better gpu!
Ответитьoh no, how can those AMD peasants live with themselves xD
ОтветитьThe face is a lot better with fsr
Ответить😶😑😑😮💨😮💨
ОтветитьFor when you need to be 2 inches from your monitor and see a difference.
ОтветитьHere's a tip for you guys
If you are 1080p gamer
Use 1440p with dlss/fsr to quality/balanced instead of using 1080p with dlss ultra quality/quality
yeah but you know what??? at least my fucking rtx 3070 can run FSR 3 unlike the DLSS 3 which is exclusive to the 4000 series
ОтветитьFsr has artifacts while dlss has gitter pick ur poison
Or keep ur old gpu and use fsr
Literally unplayable
ОтветитьAs an amd user i agree it fucking sucks
ОтветитьNvidia fanbois be like: gimme dat microscope. I need to protecc my king 😂
ОтветитьFuckin Shit Resolution 😂
Ответить...? What am I not seeing lol both look fine?
ОтветитьAmd❤
ОтветитьНа больших разрешения в 4к все эти технологии смотрятся нелепо и мыльно.
Ответитьi used fsr is best than dlss
ОтветитьFsr suck For example rdr2, Dl2.
ОтветитьFrom a far fsr looks better
ОтветитьJajajaja juegan con ojo biónico
ОтветитьRIP AMD
Ответитьaccually dlss look much better much more detailed hairs
ОтветитьFSR = Fuckin Super Resolution. It’ll put hairs on your chest
ОтветитьDLSS looks blurry.
ОтветитьFSR is functional on all competitor GPUs, therefore AMD. nVidia fans are gnashing their teeth.. only those who still have GTX1000 series are silent, because FSR works for them and they are happy, this group of people should think about why AMD in the future!
ОтветитьAMD is a little bit behind. They are still doing good work, and i want to see future improvements to FSR
Ответить"WAIT, OMAGAD! THE PIXEL WASN'T THERE!"
Ответитьthere are other factors to be considered. price, availability on different GPUs, compatibility with Linux (at least in my case), and ethics of the company. In open source communiries and Linux communities we do not like Nvidia (mostly), cos it shits on us. 90% of the time I will choose AMD, because they are open with all their inventions (and drivers) for all humanity (and Linux users) to enjoy.
ОтветитьBoth bad, never use
ОтветитьNvidia better
Ответитьyou compare DLSS3 with FSR 2 its like comparing oranges to apples!
Ответитьdlss only on rtx 40 series
fsr on almost all gpu even in nvidia 💀💀💀💀
Wait for FSR 3
ОтветитьI used amd forever and honestly never touched fsr because of this… I’ve had my never 40 series for less than a month and use dlss all the time, it’s so good
Ответить😂😂😂🎉😂😂😂
ОтветитьEveryone was gangsta until NVIDIA whipped out Ray Reconstruction with DLSS 3.5
ОтветитьAlso there are so many different settings for each they gotta be set fair
ОтветитьWhat is better?
ОтветитьQuien coño le va meter zoom por 10mil
ОтветитьFSR looks really shit in my opinion. I have AMD gpu and I’s rather play below 60 fps than have to play with FSR, in cyberpunk I use XESS and that looks so much better than FSR.
ОтветитьТолько вот, рассмотреть сию слабость амд, можно лишь при разрешении 2-4к на мониторе с диагональю от 27-ми дюймов, так и стоит ли оно того, учитывая факт того, что и по сей день нет среднего или предтопового сегмента, которые бы запускали свежие игры в этих 2-4к на максимальных графических настройках с 60-170 кадрами, дабы монитор отрабатывал свою герцовку в 144 или 170 Гц.
ОтветитьWhat the background music called 😊
ОтветитьFSR will become EX terrible when moving your camera, it got much more ghosting and artifact, and make the graphic smearing feeling
Static picture just canno shows their difference at all
Even TAA looks great when static🙂