Тэги:
#LawrenceSystems #open_source #remote_access #wireguard_vs_openvpn #best_vpn #pfsense_openvpn #pfsense_vpn #wireguard_vpn #virtual_private_network #wireguard_pfsenseКомментарии:
If you dont need any bells and whistles, go wireguard. It's newer, came out in 2015, vs 2001 openvpn. So it simpler codebase and supports only the latest and greatest. Sure OpenVPN is modern too, but it'll have a lot of fat...
ОтветитьI try to make it simple, OpenVPN for user authentication because of strong security, certificates or 2FA, and WireGuard for side to side, because of ease of setup and fast tunnel establishment
ОтветитьYeah but wireguard lets me get past work filters but openvpn doesn't
Ответить"bUt WhAt aBoUt IPsEc????????" Cries the Cisco admin who still uses L2TP/IPsec IKEv1 w/ unsecure PSKs.
ОтветитьCan WireGuard use Windows Certification authority, so the certificates would be issued to computer$ accounts, and tied to ActiveDirectory?
Because AlwaysOnVpn via RRAS on windows server sucks
Well stated Tom! Love how succinct you were on this one. Nailed it!
ОтветитьTailscale for me! No port forwarding, and no static public IP :)
Ответить