Комментарии:
Akainu was like: killing time
ОтветитьI know these reactions were written for dramatic value, but for real why is anyone surprised that the grandson of Garp and son of Dragon, like them, has conquerors haki as well?
ОтветитьMaybe this uncontrolled haki was as strong as Shanks‘ haki. The controlled haki of today is maybe not stronger than in Marineford back then.
ОтветитьI would like to see this haki with black haki flashs💯
ОтветитьBefore Luffy used the Haki: Everyone "Who is that skinny kid running around"
After Luffy used the Haki: Everyone "OH F*CK"
Rewatching impel down and marineford. I didn’t realize that Luffy first used his conquerors haki on the wolves when he saved Bon Clay.
ОтветитьThis was my go to clip for OP haki now all I watch is clips from the Luffy vs Kaido fight. Luffy has grown so much😊
Ответитьmrineford
ОтветитьIt’s not just a conqueror, but look at how far and how much people it is, wipe out the whole marine and allied member. It was the first time.
ОтветитьBefore Sengoku can give order for execution:
Sengoku says: " If it's the future you want to see, I can show it to you right now" -- thinking killing ace is killing the next future pirate generation....
UNTIL Luffy shows them all his Conquerer Haki. Another MAJOR threat in the years to come... Surprising everyone. This is probably why the marines changed their target from WB to LUFFY.
Looking back at it now, it kinda crazy
Luffy made sengoku concerned and sakazuki now wanted to kill him after he did that even though literally has no idea what he did. He’s completely oblivious to his own power. Only after some proper training did he acknowledge how awesome he really is. And the difference between how effective his conqueror’s was compared to when he came back to sabaody is astounding! He might have just knocked out 100,000 men. And after the timeskip, he knocked out 50,000 fishman, which actually makes a lot of sense considering that fishman have stronger wills than most humans.
ОтветитьSengoku realized they may be putting Ace to rest but it’ll only make his greatest threat even stronger
Ответить7:34pm (GMT+11)
27/11/2023
This video has 5,196,283 views with 53,002 likes and 595 dislikes.
There are also 2.69k subscribers and 2,451 comments.
I made it to this part in the manga, can't wait to go further! (ACEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE)
Bruh why is luffy the only one that used conquerorous haki that time
ОтветитьGood old graphics with slight of wind change and bgm ❤
ОтветитьIt's not conqueror haki that made all of them surprised, but because that so powerful conqueror haki was came from a unexperienced young boy. If I'm not wrong Luffy in this marineford arc is only 18years old.
ОтветитьWhat episode is this?
ОтветитьThank the world of one piece for having such slow executioners. They sure give plenty of time to intervene
ОтветитьThis was the best scene in that fight to be honest. Their reaction to his haki was priceless.
ОтветитьConfess the Lord Jesus Christ with your mouth and believe in your heart that He died for your sins on the cross and God raised Him from the dead on the third day; repent of your sins and be baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit!
Evidence for Jesus Christ’s existence, crucifixion, and disappearance from the tomb (He rose from it):
The Lord Jesus Christ did exist, gathered disciples, and was crucified and went missing from the tomb. To argue about wether He was taken from the grave or rose from it, is an argument a skeptic can make. Because well if you disregard the eye witness testimony of the disciples and there willingness to die for Christ, and humans won’t die for something they know is a lie, when Peter is pinned upside down to that cross, he could have said that it was a fake, but He didn’t because it wasn’t, what care would he have about death in this world if he knew for a fact he had assurance of a life in another, Jesus Christ did rise from the tomb and is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords. Now the evidence for the Lord Jesus Christ’s existence really isn’t hard to find a multitude of non-Christian scholars and historians mention Him within 150 years after the time of His life. One such is Tacitus a Roman historian who reported on emperor nero’s decision to blame the Christians for the fire that had destroyed rome in 64 AD. Tacitus wrote:
“Nero fastened the guilt ... on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of ... Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome…”
In this Tacitus makes reference to not only Christians, but Christ calling Him Christus and confirming the Gospels going on to say that He suffered the extreme penalty (crucifixion) under the reign of Tiberius and by the sentence of Pontius Pilate, which like I said confirms the Gospels narrative.
Another important source of evidence about Jesus and early Christianity can be found in the letters of Pliny the Younger to Emperor Trajan. Pliny was the Roman governor of Bithynia in Asia Minor. In one of his letters, dated around A.D. 112, he asks Trajan's advice about the appropriate way to conduct legal proceedings against those accused of being Christians. Pliny says that he needed to consult the emperor about this issue because a great multitude of every age, class, and sex stood accused of Christianity. At one point in his letter, Pliny relates some of the information he has learned about these Christians:
“They were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food – but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.”
This passage provides a number of interesting insights into the beliefs and practices of early Christians. First, we see that Christians regularly met on a certain fixed day for worship. Second, their worship was directed to Christ, demonstrating that they firmly believed in His divinity. Furthermore, one scholar interprets Pliny's statement that hymns were sung to Christ, "as to a god", as a reference to the rather distinctive fact that, "unlike other gods who were worshipped, Christ was a person who had lived on earth." If this interpretation is correct, Pliny understood that Christians were worshipping an actual historical person as God! Of course, this agrees perfectly with the New Testament doctrine that Jesus was both God and man.
You may have heard of the scholar Flavius Josephus who mentioned James as being the brother of the Lord Jesus Christ, which matches what Paul said calling James “The Lord’s brother” and there is another document that Josephus may have written which goes:
“About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he ... wrought surprising feats.... He was the Christ. When Pilate ...condemned him to be crucified, those who had . . . come to love him did not give up their affection for him. On the third day he appeared ... restored to life.... And the tribe of Christians ... has ... not disappeared.”
Now it’s up to debate wether this is the entirely original document of what Josephus wrote, or if a Christian had edited it. But regardless he wrote about the Lord Jesus Christ. Wether it was negative or positive like the possible document is. Anyways there are many other statements, documents, letters, and writings of all sorts from the ancient world talking about the Lord Jesus Christ and there is not one question if He was a real person or if He was crucified and went missing from the grave. That is clear as day, He is a real person, was crucified, and went missing from the grave. And He did rise from the grave. And for more evidence of the Lord Jesus Christ, there’s the Bible and you see there is no evidence the Bible is corrupted, a lie, created by the Roman government, folktale. It is the recount of the Disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ, now wether you want to believe it is up to you. And what profit was there in spreading Christianity, All the early Christian suffered persecution, beatings, and were killed. Another Scholar reported that James the Lord’s Brother was thrown off a building and then stoned to death for spreading the Gospel in Jerusalem. These people went to great lengths even giving their own lives for the Lord Jesus Christ.
Its your damn family again garp😂😂
ОтветитьHow to get Conqueror's Haki in real-life ?
ОтветитьAhh as a one peice fan I still can't belive this is 12 years old video where I started one peice 4 years ago
ОтветитьOnly one ever shown this strength of haki is just and only shanks. No other ever pulled off a haki like that
ОтветитьEven whitebeard in shock
ОтветитьThe borth of a legend
edit: still borthing
Goosebumps time's boys 🔥🔥
ОтветитьTHIS GIVE ME CHILLZZZZ EVERYTIME HOLY SHIIITTTTTT 🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶
ОтветитьAfter this moment admiral sakazuki decided to shift his killing target to luffy 😅😅😅
Ответитьafter luffy's fight with kaido i recognized why all the admirales and white beard where frozen ...
ОтветитьPpl are too focuse on Luffy CH in this scene. No one notice that one of the executor was Mr. 3 in disguise try to save Ace,
Even Luffy's haki didn't explode that time, maybe Ace still be saved but ofc both Mr. 3 and Ace will be in danger since Sengoku also there
Thats just a fart
ОтветитьEveryone’s is like WAIT HOLD UP HE MIGHT ACTUALLY
Ответитьwait didnte use at amazon lily
ОтветитьNow that we've past Wano and getting know more about CQ haki, this scene feels even better. This uncontrollable burst of Conq Haki shocks even the like of Admiral who probably already seen another conq haki user. For me, it means that this burst of untrained Haki is so strong and had the potential which even G5 Luffy have yet to master
ОтветитьWe know dragons favourite child 😂
ОтветитьHow many times have you watched this?
Yes.
For all his pleasantries Sengoku is not a good guy he serves the evil world government
ОтветитьIt’s all squard’s fault
Ответитьyou know you certified when whitebeard calls you a brat
ОтветитьSomeone suggested Adam Sandler as Kizaru and now I can't unsee it
ОтветитьI still come back to just watch this part
ОтветитьOne of the most iconic battles in anime featuring one hell of a foreshadowing
ОтветитьSengoku's face explains a lot
ОтветитьFun fact,that candle guy sword is below so he can stop the other sword at the last moment. If no one intervene to save Ace
ОтветитьWhite beard really shows just how versatile “that brat” is as a sentence
ОтветитьI just realized something. All the people there were accustomed to Emperor's Haki, and even some showed it earlier in life like Doflamingo, but with the power of Luffy, as far as I can tell none. This is what surprised so much everyone being the 'first time' (real first time was in woman's island) since if he could do that there, imagine full potential.
Ответить12 years ago ,, woww... Time's flying so fast
Ответить