Jean-Paul Sartre: The Road to Freedom (Human All Too Human)

💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯

no i disagree

Pretty suspect series in its premise.

Sarte..... road to hell. " Those who are thus bewildered are attracted by demonic and atheistic views. In that deluded condition, their hopes for liberation, their fruitive activities, and their culture of knowledge are all defeated. " Bhagavad Gita chapt9 v.12

True denial is a powerful protective device. ²You can and should deny any belief that error can hurt you. ³This kind of denial is not a concealment but a correction. ⁴Your right mind depends on it. ⁵Denial of error is a strong defense of truth, but denial of truth results in miscreation, the projections of the ego. ⁶In the service of the right mind the denial of error frees the mind, and re-establishes the freedom of the will. ⁷When the will is really free it cannot miscreate, because it recognizes only truth.

3. You can defend truth as well as error. ²The means are easier to understand after the value of the goal is firmly established. ³It is a question of what it is for. ⁴Everyone defends his treasure, and will do so automatically. ⁵The real questions are, what do you treasure, and how much do you treasure it? ⁶Once you have learned to consider these questions and to bring them into all your actions, you will have little difficulty in clarifying the means. ⁷The means are available whenever you ask. ⁸You can, however, save time if you do not protract this step unduly. ⁹The correct focus will shorten it immeasurably.

4. The Atonement is the only defense that cannot be used destructively because it is not a device you made. ²The Atonement principle was in effect long before the Atonement began. ³The principle was love and the Atonement was an act of love. ⁴Acts were not necessary before the separation, because belief in space and time did not exist. ⁵It was only after the separation that the Atonement and the conditions necessary for its fulfillment were planned. ⁶Then a defense so splendid was needed that it could not be misused, although it could be refused. ⁷Refusal could not, however, turn it into a weapon of attack, which is the inherent characteristic of other defenses. ⁸The Atonement thus becomes the only defense that is not a two-edged sword. ⁹It can only heal.

5. The Atonement was built into the space-time belief to set a limit on the need for the belief itself, and ultimately to make learning complete. ²The Atonement is the final lesson. ³Learning itself, like the classrooms in which it occurs, is temporary. ⁴The ability to learn has no value when change is no longer necessary. ⁵The eternally creative have nothing to learn. ⁶You can learn to improve your perceptions, and can become a better and better learner. ⁷This will bring you into closer and closer accord with the Sonship; but the Sonship itself is a perfect creation and perfection is not a matter of degree. ⁸Only while there is a belief in differences is learning meaningful.

A Course In Miracles

Mr Rhee is incompetent to teach philosophy.

Sartre's 'philosophy' is the road to hell. Utterly adolescent.

Invent who what ye R........................................................ 🍳... Sartre..... But. Baba..... STILL CHILD.. BA. BA. VIV LA FRANCE?................. For !......................................................................................................................................... 🍄🍳😱🍾😂💓😊😅♥️😘😔😍😁😉❤️😭🤣💞😒😜😐🙄💙😀🚑🚛🏡🕕🌈🌈🔥☃️⚡⛱️🌪️🌦️⛈️⛅⭐🌝🌡️🌦️🌪️🛎️🚀🚟🛬✈️❄️🌊⚡☂️🌈🌬️🪐🌀🌬️🕗🪐🌂🌈🪐⛱️⚡🌠.. Later. Ba ba 4 now. Then. NHS PARTY.................................. +=+=+=+=+=+. !

Also comparing Russell's union stands and Sartre's fascisct stands is kind of an insult to the people who read political philosophy 😊

The title is a little bit of embarrasment for the legacy of Bertrand Russell.

If any one is interested in real philosophy they should learn from Plato, Aristole and the Scholastics( and from the Germans). This means that you should are expected to learn ancient Greek, Latin and German. The order in which you study is rational philosophy, moral philosophy and natural philosophy. I have learnt rational philosophy but indeed to skip to Natural Philosophy( part of Natural Philosophy called Metaphysics)

You know it's gonna be bullshit when you see Bernard-Henri Levy in the introduction.

I am so glad another Iranian is watching this program.
زن زندگى آزادى

what a treat

Thanks, would be great if you could upload Nietzsche and Heidegger ones too.

“Why do I read?
I just can't help myself.
I read to learn and to grow, to laugh
and to be motivated.
I read to understand things I've never
been exposed to.
I read when I'm crabby, when I've just
said monumentally dumb things to the
people I love.
I read for strength to help me when I
feel broken, discouraged, and afraid.
I read when I'm angry at the whole
world.
I read when everything is going right.
I read to find hope.
I read because I'm made up not just of
skin and bones, of sights, feelings,
and a deep need for chocolate, but I'm
also made up of words.
Words describe my thoughts and what's
hidden in my heart.
Words are alive--when I've found a
story that I love, I read it again and
again, like playing a favorite song
over and over.
Reading isn't passive--I enter the
story with the characters, breathe
their air, feel their frustrations,
scream at them to stop when they're
about to do something stupid, cry with
them, laugh with them.
Reading for me, is spending time with a
friend.
A book is a friend.
You can never have too many.”

Subscribe this channel Differences for educational content and information 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇨🇭

This was a truly excellent series by the BBC, and in particular, their rendering of Nietzsche was spectacular if not brilliant. I think I heard a rumor that the BBC later pulled this series from their own website, as if to cover up something they had exposed.