Комментарии:
What the ffff are you reviewing…
Ответитьthe sm58 head on the qlxd sounds better than the sm58 head on the glxd.
Ответить58 is clearly the best one.Its mid range is what it makes it sound like a pro mic, while the rest are just hyped this or that way....
ОтветитьCouldnt hear a dam thing what the heck you are saying. It is you call mic testing 😅😅😅
Ответить71171tqgqtwtwgetqtsstwgsgwtwgwytyqyawgwyshwywwhvSshsvshwhsgsgwg
ОтветитьNot sure how well I can trust a reviewer being an expert on the subject matter when his own audio on the video is so low that you can't hear it.
ОтветитьThe Audio Technica sounds better with speech. Less eq required. Vocals are clearer.
ОтветитьTOO LONG
ОтветитьCan you please tell me where is each of these microphones made? Thank you very much
ОтветитьWish the poor guy knew how to turn his mic up enough to hear him.
Ответить“Hey Biff, get a load of this guy’s life preserver, Dork thinks he’s gonna drown!”
Ответить2.4ghz mics are the worse invention ever. I had one and they drop out like crazy.
ОтветитьAudio technica is good quality of sound
ОтветитьAudio quality: is there a significant difference between the QLXD and Sennheiser D1? Thanks
ОтветитьIm using audiotechnica system10 and the sound is sow good..like sennheiser...👍☺💗💗💗
Ответитьi'm quite bothered by the handling noise on the audio technica, but how was it in actual use? i'm considering this as my first wireless mic for church and other singing events.
ОтветитьDont by a 2,4GHz wireless microphone system.. even at 8m distance I get only dropouts..
ОтветитьYou prefer your QLXD systems over these new Digital Microphones?
ОтветитьGreat review!
Ответить