Evolution & Classification of Life | From Single Celled Bacteria to Humans

Evolution & Classification of Life | From Single Celled Bacteria to Humans

UsefulCharts

4 года назад

913,011 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

Seuku Miadora
Seuku Miadora - 05.11.2023 00:48

So You're telling me that we Humans are close related to Mouses and Rats?

Ответить
Richard Cranium
Richard Cranium - 03.11.2023 11:51

How tall were the first modern humans? Because the average San man is only around 150 cms tall. First humans also probably had darker skin then the San tribe. Who are yellowish brown but not dark brown. Though they are genetically closes to the earliest Homo Sapien fossils scientists have found.

Ответить
UnknownMF
UnknownMF - 31.10.2023 21:22

Can someone explain me how the hell we are the only genus homo that survived??? Like simians, apes and great apes survived. but our related homo species died out???? and the others are much older? how

Ответить
Gomezgani Chilinda
Gomezgani Chilinda - 30.10.2023 12:43

Very well-explained and clear video. 👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾

Ответить
David Frenzel
David Frenzel - 27.10.2023 08:24

Dinosaurs, Pterosaurs, Plesiosaurs And Ichthyosuars need to be erased out of the chart, it's because in truth that if some creatures are mythical including Unicorns, trolls and Dragons, then that Dinosaurs, Pterosaurs, Plesiosaurs And Ichthyosaurs are mythical creatures too if some creatures are mythchal including Unicorns, trolls and Dragons.

Ответить
A B
A B - 11.10.2023 08:33

Compare the beauty and magnitude of all this (just one field within science: biology) with the crude stories of all religions

Ответить
FƎEΔ ♆ΩV☈. ƧƬΛЯᵥₙG ᛖIᴎΔ
FƎEΔ ♆ΩV☈. ƧƬΛЯᵥₙG ᛖIᴎΔ - 08.10.2023 15:59

In a monophyletic classification Semiformes has two daughter clades Platyrrhini (New World Monkeys) and Cattarhini (Old World Monkeys). Cattarhini has two daughter groups that are BOTH ancestrally old world monkeys, Cercopithecoidea (also called Old World Monkeys) and Hominoidea (aka Apes). So, Apes are monkeys since Cattarhini are considered monkeys.

Ответить
john Thehillboy
john Thehillboy - 06.10.2023 23:10

Hello,
Where can I purchase this Chart? Your website, visual capitalist, is not working, search or any tabs and Amazon says it is not available.
Thank-you
John

Ответить
Thetruth156 Real
Thetruth156 Real - 06.10.2023 00:07

I can’t understand why more creatures have become extinct then are alive today, you would have thought they would have evolved. I on the other hand know that evolution does not happen fast enough to take advantage of its environment. The coelacanth for example has not changed in 450 million years nor the varroa mite and neither have the animals they feed on,,very strange.

Ответить
Ali Hassan Mir
Ali Hassan Mir - 28.09.2023 11:56

Im glad finally someone explained that we're not evolved from monkeys, we evolved from another homo species. What happened before that is irrelevant

Ответить
Alex Valdez
Alex Valdez - 26.09.2023 08:47

i could watch this over and over again

Ответить
THOMAS
THOMAS - 22.09.2023 08:11

Where Adam and eve ?

Ответить
Nicole Cuntapay
Nicole Cuntapay - 21.09.2023 14:21

Is this Cells to Singurlarity?

Ответить
A M
A M - 17.09.2023 22:17

Thanks for clearing my doubts regarding who came first in the homo genus in just 2 minutes👍

Ответить
Domain of knowledge
Domain of knowledge - 08.09.2023 16:50

good work really interesting to learn about evolution and common ancestor theory.

Ответить
arthur barrette
arthur barrette - 03.09.2023 01:37

so can you explain to me; native american, asian, african, european, oceanian, if we all have the same ancestor, where and how old is the evolution of our physical difference in human.

Ответить
walkergarya
walkergarya - 30.08.2023 23:52

List of standard Creationist lies
1) ID is science, not creationism. Despite this being proven false in court, you will still see the claim made.
2) Creationists deliberately misrepresent their credentials in order to argue from authority. Whether it's John Lenox calling himself a scientist or Ravi Zacharias' false education claims.
3) Deliberately misusing radiometric dating. In particular the Mt St Helens example. This was a blatant attempt as deception.
4) Probability claims. You see a fee of these. Any mathematician knows you can't produce a probability from a sample of one. So probability claims about fine tuning are essentially lies.
5) Deliberately misrepresenting scientific data. The list for this is endless. Creationist claims about fossil numbers are a good example.
6) quote mining. Darwin on the eye is a prime example.
7) straw men. Referring to evolution through natural selection as random chance. Every major creationist has been corrected on this at some point but you still hear it.
8) Claims like malachite man or the London hammer. Shown to be fallacious claims but they keep arising.
9) The implication of micro and micro evolution being two different processes (every creationist asserts this without any understanding of DNA mutation)
10) Associating atheism with evolution (then bringing up Hitler, Stalin, Mao as mass murderers)
11) All mutations are harmful; no beneficial mutations exist (hear it ll the time).
12) It is just a Theory!

Ответить
Grass tete
Grass tete - 29.08.2023 12:06

This theory is according to historian but my question is, what happened then monkeys stop involving to be come human being?

Ответить
torqtorqtorq
torqtorqtorq - 19.08.2023 19:26

I wish I could like this a hundred times

Ответить