After Effects VS Nuke | Which One is Better

If i want to get a job as a vfx artist i need to switch from after effects to nuke?

So nuke is much better, but Adobe is cheap. Relatively

Fusion is the future. 10-20 years from now it will be the world standard.

Show me something one cant do that the other can for free and youll have a winner. Movies and vfx have been done for years without Nuke or Ae so to those saying one comps better is bs how many nodes or layers does one need for an explosion lets be real your really just doing one effect at a time, anything else is hate or fanboyism

AE With bunch of cool 3rd party plugins>>>>> NUKE, Fusion and 69 others

After effects is the best and more powerful, I use it for a longtime, Nuke is complicated using the nodes system. in the world of jobs, After effects is the most dominant , and it uses a lot of free plug ins and scripts, which help the work done fast.

please make a video on nuke vs fusion studio. please sir

nuke is film comoisiting one tool it is katana, aftereffect is swiss multitool all rounder, fusion is terrible hybrid Zeratul

Nuke best

After Effects is the best choice for media and 2D animations
Nuke is so powerful tool for compositing.
they are different in core and aspect, they can NOT be put to comparison .

What about fusion is it good ?

Nuke = VFX
AE = Motion graphics
Fusion = Both.

I have a channel if anyone would like to learn nuke. Nuke is the main compositing software used on feature films!

Nuke point Render

i feel like he didnt make this clear enough, but, Nuke is used in just about every tv show and movie made in recent years. After Effects is practically NEVER used as a COMPOSITING tool in movies or tv shows at all.

Easy, Nuke for Rich, AE for Poors, I`m Poor!!!

never heard of nuke before

That’s like comparing an ARRI Alexa vs an Iphone lol

Sir I want to add 3d objects to my video and I want to do 3d compositing. Which is better, after effects or blender

Nuke x Autodesk Flame

After effects adobe team needs to STOP everything they’re working on and focus on speed and performance, period. They leave us no choice but to switch to other programs, I wouldn’t dare to do a compositing project on AE anymore, clients don’t care about excuses.

Köszönöm a munkád, nagyon hasznos volt!!! :D

The softs are for different purposes.

I hope this channel never ends and keep spreading happiness ❤️

Nodes > Layers. Period.

We all have a personal choice but really it's the client work we come into contact with, knowing both+ is the road we have to walk.. Because we stay busy working with the larger skill set. That's the true answer.. do what they need, use what we feel is the best tool to achieve that. good video dude!

Adobe interface is a total nightmare. It is like trying to explore outer space using 18th century navigation system.

Different uses. Nuke is better at comping, matte, tracking and 3d integration. AE is better at generalized compositing and motion graphics. Fusion is second best at comping but not so good at mograph. Blender.. a fucking joke for compositing. END OF STORY.

Apples and Oranges.

Nuke smooth & sweet 😊

I used ae for making peppa pig cartoon

Can you please recommend some channels or lessons to learn Nuke?

NATRON is better than both and it's free!

I use both for good usage. It’s great

Nuke and Fusion!👍🤘

I used After effect for several years
and after a brief foray with Natron
( a free Nuke knock off), I moved to Davinci fusion.

Trust me ...once you get over 6 or 7 layers, and have to start precomping ,Adobe After effects becomes a compositing nightmare because it is still ,at its core, a linear workflow
.
Unlike Nuke, Natron or fusion which are completely node based allowing you to jump to any point in the node tree history and change ,remove or add an effect in a nonlinear fashion.

Nuke is OBVIOUSLY Superior to trash After Effects!