Комментарии:
Canon realized they don’t have the bandwidth to fill out their APSC lineup so they decided some money is better than no money and licensed the mount to third party manufacturers for APSC only.
FF won’t be coming anytime soon and all this is is canon continuing to be greedy. Plus it gets people off their backs for a little while.
Canon sucks and I’m sick of it. This is coming from a canon owner who has an r6 mark 2 and an r7
What about the R100? I have one
ОтветитьThe Sigma 14mm f1.4 for the astro shooters out there!
ОтветитьI'd like to see the whole Sigma i-series FF prime collection getting an RF mount, at least. And, of course, the top-end Art lenses are very much welcome too. I don't care about the APS-C at all. I think that it was a mistake to bring it to RF system in the first place. The EF-M was perfectly fine for those who needed it.
ОтветитьAny note on whether you will be able to get the full fps out of the Canon cameras? I think it would be a good move for Canon to not limit Sigma with fps like Sony does. Or at least not as heavily, considering the entry level R8 & mid level R6II do 40fps and with Sony the only ones that do more than 15 are the high end bodies
ОтветитьMakes me consider a switch to the C70 😆
ОтветитьCanon back into game🎉🔥
ОтветитьCrop, crop sensor cameras.
ОтветитьSigma rf 60-600mm would be epic
ОтветитьIm very new to this world of video, and photography. At least when it comes to real cameras. I understand if i would buy a ef lens, abd a adopter. If the lens is 16-35mm for a full frame. It would be like a 25-55mm on my R50. Would that be the same thing with these lens?
ОтветитьWhere can i look at these new tamron lens to buy?
ОтветитьYas
Ответить🤟🏾🤟🏾🤟🏾
ОтветитьCanon R10 shooter here‼️
ОтветитьHi Tony, how's it going? I love your videos, thank you so much for them. They have helped me a bunch when I first began my photography journey back in Feb this year. I am still learning all the terminologies and what SS/AP/ISO to use in different settings being , for instance, landscape or street photography or portrait photos, etc. I am currently using an old Canon 550 D with my new Sigma lens 24-70mm f2.8 and I love it. However, I am thinking of upgrading and ideally would like to better features like wifi and sensors as well a better feel of the camera. Can you recommend any for me that are Canon. Initially, I would like to do some videography in the late future when I am more comfortable with photography. Please and thank you. Essentially, my budget would be within the $700 (£650) range as I live in the UK.
ОтветитьThanks. Very good points mentioned! I hope we will see very soon also third party lenses for Canon RF full frame bodies as well! Canon also needs to release more prime lenses for their RF mount!
ОтветитьI want an RF Sigma Art 35mm prime lens!!
ОтветитьAnother reason is that many people sold their R cameras from Canon, and switched to brands who have more options in terms of glass. Looking forward to the 10-18mm and 18-50mm.
ОтветитьIm waiting tamron RF 35-150mm
Ответитьi want a cheaper 700 200 f4 because it is EXPENSIVE
ОтветитьI'd love to see a video on the best lighting accessories in 2024 :)
ОтветитьI understand them coming out with the RF S first but I hope the lenses for full frame are not far behind. I have the Canon R6m2 with the Sigma 150-600 C (with adapter of course) and I like it, as I shoot wildlife mostly. But the adapter makes the buffer smaller and the iso is not as good as with a Canon RF lens, so I think my camera with a Sigma RF 150-600 will do even better. Hope they bring it out soon. But, like I said: very happy with the current combo.
ОтветитьMany thanks💗💗💗
ОтветитьI dont like the colours of the lumix your skin looks kinda off and the auto focus... well...
ОтветитьWe need new Zeiss lenses for the RF mount with autofocus!
ОтветитьSigma needs to bring 35 50 85 fullframe all at 1.4f. The native 50mm 85 1.8 from Canon is absolute trash …. And canon only has f1.2 options and no 1.4
ОтветитьClickbait. Apsc lenses only. Anticompetitive.
Ответить35 mm 1.4
ОтветитьCanon, stop manipulating. Nobody believes that you will let to produce FF lenses ever by Sigma or Tamron.
Ответитьwhy are you unboxing so many boxes every video? hahaha
ОтветитьI’m in a predicament where I want to get rid of my r7 it’s great but I need a third party lens and canon although a good camera for beginners it is horrible in terms of $
ОтветитьSigma lovers are such whiners. I hear them all complaining that there are no Sigma lenses for Canon mirrorless cameras. If they want to shot Sigma lenses then buy a Sony or Nikon.
ОтветитьQuestions about aps-c lenses. I have an R10. Will an APSc lense at 50mm give me true 50mm focal length on a crop sensor? I hope my question makes sense... still learning lol
ОтветитьCanon and Nikon banning third parting lenses has been a huge selling point for Sony.
ОтветитьI just want the 35-150mm 2-2.8 already
ОтветитьJust picked up my R7, can’t wait! Does anyone have an official release date?
ОтветитьR50 owner here, excited for more lenses.
Ответитьfullframe when
Ответитьa bit too late , have an r7 but was so annoyed by the lens situation(have ef lenses from my old camera with adapter ,so much choice and thought it would be the same) that i switched fully to sony emount system and my r7 is only sitting here, not much people i can sell where i live ,most are sony or nikon because of the lens choices.
Ответитьoh and even worse for canon honestly , the sigma lenses send their ca data to the camera ,really? on my sony a7riii , my tamrons viltrox sigmas and whatever do that too , that shouldn't be considered a great bonus but obviously a total normal feature.
ОтветитьWhat would be the best overall lense in this new lineup for the R7, with good resolution (For video) ?
ОтветитьSo disappointing for us that have the R6M2 :( we need RF Full Frame 3rd party...............
ОтветитьI currently use an R7 with a Canon 17-55 2.8 with an adapter for R mount, what are the differences between sigma 18-50 2.8 these lenses? Is it worth the change? The weight difference is very noticeable, but is the quality worth it?
ОтветитьCanon already makes the best lens, and it's also the best value lens, for Canon mirrorless cameras, with the RF 200-800, for the fantastic price of only $1900. What is Sigma going to do that is any better than that ??? ....I guess I should say > for my purposes :)
Honestly, I kind of trip on all you typical wide shooting guys, that you can't find a good lens offering already ? Talk about splitting hairs. Try finding a good 1280mm combo. You have only 1 choice.
Convenient that the Viltrox is being blocked.
ОтветитьMy Canon R100 wants a Sigma third party lens attached to it.
Ответить2024.08.09.... stilll no zooms... canon is a dreamer...
ОтветитьSo when is the date
ОтветитьSigma 85mm f1.4 art
ОтветитьThoughts? Feelings on third-party lenses? What lenses do you want to see first?
Ответить