Комментарии:
Разница 10-20 fps😂 шикарный результат при общем числе в 200-300fps
ОтветитьIn 4K - NO difference! LOL
ОтветитьНе буду менять свой 12700k еще пару лет )
Ответитьthis is trash only 10 fps def
ОтветитьI have 7500F for $118, it can easily run rtx 4090😂😂😂
ОтветитьI have i7 12700k 😢
ОтветитьI9 'S
VERY GOOD CPU'S
FIRST TIME FOR YEARS SINCE
1998 WHEN I SWITCHED FROM PENTIUM
TO AMD'S 1000MHZ WHICH BLEW ME AWAY
FRON CRAPPY INTELS SLOW DISSAPIONTING LINE OF CPU'S
DAY AND KNIGHT...
THEN 1090T
THEN FX 8150 BLACK EDITION
WOW..USE IT STILL TODAY.
FX9590 BUILDING IT 2024....
Just a clock speed increase, no innovation whatsoever. Intel is not impressing anyone here.
ОтветитьIntel CPUs are fucing bullshit
ОтветитьHogwart still around 75fps on best cpu on market in 1080p. No idea how this game got so popular without any optimisation at all...
ОтветитьOne reason why I'm holding out for AMD's upcoming Hawk Point 8000 (8700G model) Desktop APU G- Series. Less power consumption, with a powerful iGPU equivalent to a GTX 1060. The only tradeoff is less L3 Cache, I can live with it because I'm coming from a 9 year old i7 4790k.😊
ОтветитьPlaying on 1080p Will have some bottlenecking issues
ОтветитьYes i have a 12900k and im not upgrading to 13900k or 14900k😂👌
In the future 15900k or 15700k, or mayby for the 16 gen🤔
Who knows🤷♂️
🎀дякую🇺🇦
ОтветитьIt’s surprising just how little intels performance has increased over the 12900k it’s could early be arch with a overclock of 30w which intel have done
ОтветитьIk ben veel benieuwder naar het verschil tussen de 13900K en 14900K
ОтветитьFX 8320 WIN
ОтветитьI'm starting to think the only difference is the wattage, increase i9 12000K wattage and label as i9 14000K and you get a new processor 😂🤣
ОтветитьA 4.9G vs 5.7G story……
ОтветитьHello! Could you tell me how you can record the screen without losing performance? Any software or video recorder? Thank you
ОтветитьPlease made the test only on P cores with equal cores frequency. Cause in the current test almost 1 ghz difference for P cores.
ОтветитьHigher clock speeds, but no other big changes make that slight difference. Mainly something better 1perc and 0,1perc lows.
The buy of 14900K would make sense if combo would be at very similar price.
Isn't Ryzen 7800X3D better choise?
the 7950x3d is so clear. Intel aint it these days 🤣
ОтветитьThx for testing hitman3 in the most intensive cpu area,especially when you handover the invitation part.
Ответитьplease try competitive high fps games for cpu bound
ОтветитьHave to ask yourself if the few fps are worth it especially now that you can get a 5ghz capable ES 12900k for $150
Ответить12900K P-cores should be running at 5100MHz all-core stock... so imagine even higher fps with the 12900K, further closing the gap
ОтветитьI bought an i9 12900k for 250 euros and I definitely have no reason to buy an i 9 14900k, cost, performance or consumption
Ответить1080p?!? No one will be using that with this combination 😂
Ответить12900K better Performance per watt. Performance difference is very low. Why someone upgrade 12900K to 14900K?
Ответитьabsolute joke
Ответитьplease just stick to 1440p man, we get it, but 99.9% of us will game no lower then 1440p with a 4090 and a i9 like me
Ответитьeu tenho
i5 10400f
gtx 1660S
ssd sata 3
8gb Ram single Channel
minha dúvida é, que em muitos jogos meu Pc fica dando gargalo, e em alguns casos os gargalos são fortes, exemplo: resident 4 remake acima dos 69fps, DO NADA cai pra 1 FPS e trava, depois volta ao normal, e acontece com bastante frequência, até no GTA V acontece isso.
eu queria saber se eu botar +1 pente de 8gb pra ficar (8x8)=16Gb ou um pente de 16 pra ficar (16x8)=24Gb (dual Channel) queria saber se com isso acaba os gargalos nos jogos
eu queria muito saber se pode ser a memória ram,
minhas especificações são:
PROCESSADOR INTEL i5-10400F
GEFORCE GTX 1660 Super 6GB
MEMÓRIA 8GB T Force 3200mhz
b560m-t alphard
fonte 500W 80plus
Просто вольтаж задрали и повысили частоты. Позор голубым. Нет чтоб как красные делать действительно новое поколение, включая не в последнюю очередь новый техпроцесс.
ОтветитьPlease note that this test was using a 1080p monitor. At 4k, it’ll probably be a 3-5% difference.
Ответить4.9ghz vs 5.7ghz...
bad comparison.. MAKE SAME speed clock comparison?!!?!!
then make same 4.9 vs 4.9 will almost both same fps..
why no test in CS2?
ОтветитьForget the max and AVG.
ONLY look at 0.1% and 1% lows, then decide if its worth the upgrade..
test i9 12900KS
Ответитьcan you make the same test but on 14900k with INTEL APO?
ОтветитьNo difference Intel 12\13\14, Only frequency??
Ответитьi wanted to upgrade my 12700k to a 14700k and im not doing it after seing that
ОтветитьWent ryzen 1700 to 12700k solid upgrade
ОтветитьIt is harder and harder to squeeze more fps. !4900K is a beast.
ОтветитьGreedtel
ОтветитьOnce your at 50 fps your not going to notice a game not looking smooth .
Nobody can spot 80fps from 150 fps with the human eye .
14900k using the 10nm+++++ aka intel 7 😂😂😂
ОтветитьYeah, at least AMD actually had a massive improvement from all of the generations from Ryzen 1000 to Ryzen 5000 and then again from Ryzen 5000 to Ryzen 7000. Honestly, if you're looking for a high performance desktop CPU at any cost, Intel shouldn't even be considered. I mean, the amount of power required for Intel CPUs to perform better than or even close to AMD Ryzen CPUs is insane.
Ответитьperformance difference closely follows the cpu-power consumption
Ответить