Unsure about the new Omega Speedmaster Professional Moonwatch

Unsure about the new Omega Speedmaster Professional Moonwatch

YoureTerrific

2 года назад

217,171 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@desireless4092
@desireless4092 - 26.12.2023 16:48

As a space nerd I am about to get this watch, but I was worried if making the "wrong" choice. You know - acrylic might come handy if I need to go to space with my non existing shuttle... You never know, you know. On the other hand the practicality of Sapphire is hard to ignore. Safe to say, your video pushed me in to the sapphire zone. Sadly, it means like you I will most likely be disqualified from boarding a space shuttle.

Ответить
@DangerClose3200
@DangerClose3200 - 06.12.2023 18:54

This dude is better off doing dildo reviews.

Ответить
@DangerClose3200
@DangerClose3200 - 06.12.2023 18:53

But it was on the F Moon!!!

Ответить
@3rayallen
@3rayallen - 01.11.2023 02:33

You're wearing the wrong in the wrong part of your wrist. Learn how to properly wear a watch. Neanderthal.

Ответить
@seabiscuit726142
@seabiscuit726142 - 26.10.2023 01:11

Keeping the chronograph ON all the time will reduce significantly the power reserve. The second hand is the one on the left side sub-dial. The one that looks like the second hand on a 3-hand watch is the chronograph hand.

Ответить
@edstarrs2195
@edstarrs2195 - 17.10.2023 05:43

I have been really trying to love this watch but can't get past the manual wind part, no-one seems to mention that it's not an automatic watch. I appreciate the quality, history, design, proportion etc of this watch but it's not really my style. It looks like it should be worn by an engineer who wears khakis and drives an Audi

Ответить
@jvd9202
@jvd9202 - 09.10.2023 20:06

My new Speedmaster came with the micro adjustment clasp

Ответить
@peterhogan9537
@peterhogan9537 - 04.10.2023 23:54

so buy a Rolex.

Ответить
@brianw8105
@brianw8105 - 22.09.2023 13:14

Thank you!! Such a helpful review, especially all of the “real-life” wrist shots and angles. I loved your objectivity and humor as well.

Ответить
@user-ne9up1dk9z
@user-ne9up1dk9z - 11.09.2023 18:28

like Rolex HAVENT worked the Daytona?

Ответить
@driller7714
@driller7714 - 06.09.2023 02:46

Looking at the moon watch is like staring into the depths of space. Fitting don’t you think?

Ответить
@robrobertson1458
@robrobertson1458 - 04.09.2023 15:11

I think with the METAS certification the water resistance is higher than 50 meters – but Omega wants to be close to the original and therefore still defines it as 50 meters

Ответить
@tommyhenriquezkayakangler8465
@tommyhenriquezkayakangler8465 - 31.08.2023 17:37

Brother, I can care less about the moon. Moon aside that’s a very nice watch.

Ответить
@Androcentus
@Androcentus - 24.08.2023 15:03

too bad for you...

Ответить
@tomasinacovell4293
@tomasinacovell4293 - 14.08.2023 20:34

They've really made the Aqua-Terra look look like crap now, but there's something just off about the way they do ever re-release of the classics too, starting with the ugly faux platina, burnt lume. So it really comes down to this one, and I love the bracelet and the pattern on the clasp, but then they cheap out with no micro-adjustments, that's like broadcasting that they're really not a professional watch brand and so what if you don't like it or us.

Ответить
@emmalab02
@emmalab02 - 27.07.2023 01:55

As a Purdue grad, this is my grail watch because my fellow alumnus wore it to the moon even though he left it with Aldrin before he stepped on the moon itself.

Ответить
@johnprosser5035
@johnprosser5035 - 24.07.2023 22:08

Applied indices and 100m WR and for me it would be perfect!

Ответить
@georgecupac1202
@georgecupac1202 - 21.07.2023 05:48

I'd rather a real watch ,than a fake watch taking credit for someone else's achievements.

Ответить
@clayrowden3916
@clayrowden3916 - 18.07.2023 06:32

I just got my SS on bracelet on 10.7.23 and I am very pleased with it. I have wanted a "Moonwatch" since the 70's and it looks like my timing is excellent. The 3861 with all its technical / mechanical advancements is amazing. The new 5 link melt on your wrist bracelet with the recently introduced on the fly micro length adjustment. The new stepped dial, lume, domed hands, dot over 90, etc... is close to perfection. I chose the SS because of the durability and the open case back. I love to look at the movement. I am very pleased. It set me back USD 8,000 and is a tremendous value. Oh, yeah did I say it is beautiful. A classy, humble beautiful.

Ответить
@gori277
@gori277 - 13.07.2023 14:24

Kind of found out about this channel a little bit late into my watch obsession and your very unusual style (for a USA’er) heavily sprinkled with sarcasm really resonates with me. Quickly becoming a fan, please don’t sell out.

Ответить
@jamisonbonds9757
@jamisonbonds9757 - 29.06.2023 23:08

The connection to the "moon landing" makes me like this watch LESS. There's ZERO chance we landed on the moon in 1969. I can't even get cell phone service in 2023 at the lake house. C'mon. Might buy the sapphire sandwich in a week or two despite this... We shall see.

Ответить
@timtim2949
@timtim2949 - 27.06.2023 15:57

I don’t care if it’s a normie pick, but the Speedmaster Professional is one of the coolest watches ever, in my opinion. To me it’s as iconic as a Rolex Submariner.

Ответить
@krivokoraivan8941
@krivokoraivan8941 - 27.06.2023 14:24

Несмотря на то, что автор жуткий зануда, была высказана интересная мысль касательно связи нынешней компании Omega и достижений той компании, из середины прошлого века.

Ответить
@falcon81701
@falcon81701 - 23.06.2023 09:38

The clasp with adjustment came with mine so Omega must have decided to include it after this video was published

Ответить
@jimmy7494
@jimmy7494 - 11.06.2023 14:04

I think you’re being very harsh, ok yeah this exact model didn’t go to the moon but 50% of the parts of the 3861 mov’t is the same as the 1861 and this is just a polished up version of the 861, and the 861 is just an updated version of the original 321 movement made in 1957-68.

Also, Omega has tested the new 3861 using the same tests nasa used on the original moon watch.

The new bracket and clasp is also similar to the earlier ones, you’ll really struggle to find a Watch that’s easily available that’s modern and still has a lot of its original features and using similar movements (from before they became part of swatch, and tbf omegas movement development and technology has really thrived in the last decade ish years).

Yeh they’ve gone on about the moon, but it’s still an epic story, hopefully be my next watch

Ответить
@stray1467
@stray1467 - 15.05.2023 22:34

This isn’t a watch that went to the moon , it is THE WATCH that went to the moon. Love it or hate it, it is a legend and a must have for all collections.

Ответить
@aneesjassim79
@aneesjassim79 - 12.05.2023 11:21

Maybe best watch came out recently

Ответить
@UltraDoug
@UltraDoug - 11.05.2023 22:03

I’d love to see a revisit with the more recent (2022 ?) release of the Speedmaster 57 line. Blue, Green, Burgandy variants. 😎👍🏼

Ответить
@CraigRoccanova
@CraigRoccanova - 07.05.2023 21:11

Great review! I still bought one and am currently wearing it. As far as tool watches go, this is one of the only ones that kind of makes sense to me. Water resistance doesn't matter too much since I haven't gone swimming in... a decade. And I probably wouldn't wear a watch if I did swim anyway. Plus this watch is rated for a swim after all. Pro tip: Don't go in the ocean the day after a major storm... Rip currents can be deadly! Therapy helps!

Ответить
@bubbabfp1
@bubbabfp1 - 07.05.2023 12:57

I love SS 3861!!!

Ответить
@wescobts
@wescobts - 30.04.2023 15:32

As always a great review. I have never worn a Speedmaster, but I feel the same way, great watch...but for someone else.

Ответить
@doctoruttley
@doctoruttley - 22.04.2023 18:31

🤦🏻‍♂️

Ответить
@watchcurtisn
@watchcurtisn - 10.04.2023 01:10

Underrated watch!

Ответить
@hultii
@hultii - 05.04.2023 11:19

Just got mine, I absolutely love it. Mine has micro adjustment.

Ответить
@tombreakwell8956
@tombreakwell8956 - 05.04.2023 00:07

Just a heads up for any viewers - Omega now has an adjustable clasp as standard on these :) Started around end of 2022

Mine has one

Ответить
@mapled3135
@mapled3135 - 04.04.2023 14:45

This review feels like a review of a cat person reviewing a Belgian Milanois

Ответить
@HaIsKuL
@HaIsKuL - 04.04.2023 07:29

How many damn variations does the Speedmaster have now?

Ответить
@jussil5762
@jussil5762 - 29.03.2023 15:25

I don’t have any problems with sharp case or hair pulling. And it does have micro adjustment. I am very satisfied with my watch.

Ответить
@thegorn
@thegorn - 08.03.2023 16:54

I will never own a watch with male genitalia at 12. It’s subliminal and the people who do buy this piece are actually closet homosexual, whether they realise it or not.

Ответить
@thegorn
@thegorn - 08.03.2023 16:51

It’s ergonomically garbage. Manual winding of a watch with the crown buried in the case gets real old real quick. I appreciate it, but I’d appreciate an auto rotor and solid caseback plus 100m of water resistance even more.

Ответить
@Chilam.
@Chilam. - 02.03.2023 11:58

I genuinely don't think anyone's angry about the coaxial escapement on the new Speedmaster

Ответить
@johnnybgood7812
@johnnybgood7812 - 25.02.2023 10:38

Great video, than-you!
I’ve always dismissed the Speedy 42 assuming it would be too large on my 7” wrist and I don’t like the 38mm so I was amazed when I tried this yesterday. Looked absolutely spot on size wise and that bracelet is next level of comfort. Love it!

Ответить
@nads7865
@nads7865 - 23.02.2023 00:51

This is a pretty good review. I ended up going to a local AD and saw this side-by-side against the Seamaster, I was left unimpressed. It just has a plain design that doesn't work for me. When the light hits the watch, you can see the matte almost gray finish, by contrast the Seamaster glows in light.

Ответить
@dopagony9946
@dopagony9946 - 19.02.2023 20:41

Agree, I couldn't care less about the moon landing "history". I got this watch (hesalite) because its a new-vintage design with a superb movement. Love the looks, how it wears, and the fact that it comes with a hesalite crystal. I really enjoy this watch, but again, couldn't care less about the moon stuff.

Ответить
@JoseJoeable
@JoseJoeable - 12.02.2023 08:25

The Speedmaster is a cool watch. Last year I was able to get a new old stock of an 1861 on an alligator. I get a lot of compliments and I have seen the new updated one, but just something about the discontinued version I like more. And that hesalite although it scratches easily looks so clear and I love that alligator gives the watch a classic look.

Ответить
@sofian666
@sofian666 - 09.02.2023 17:29

Hi,

Could someone share the link of the story where WatchOnMyWrist did change the clasp please. I can‘t find it on IG

Ответить
@matt_d7828
@matt_d7828 - 07.02.2023 19:29

I’ve recently acquired the Speedy Pro with the cal. 1861 from my bro in law who needed to make room for his collection. The speedy pro was in the chopping block but I grabbed the opportunity to buy it. It’s a 2018 Big Box with all the goodies. It was priced fairly well. He included the new bracelet as well which made the wearing experience on my 6.25” feel incredible. It’s so good that it took the wrist time away from my Explorer 124270. It’s an incredible watch and i love looking at the dial.

Ответить
@melocoton7
@melocoton7 - 26.01.2023 17:23

the new bracelet changed everything about this one and I love it. I had the "old" version and bought the new bracelet. It feels much better on the wrist and looks so good.

Ответить
@vantage789
@vantage789 - 24.01.2023 18:10

'Just enough bling' on the bracelet is the perfect way to put it. The bracelet on the hesalite version is just missing a little something. Damn it's a really hard choice though between the sapphire and hesalite.

Ответить
@coldworld5
@coldworld5 - 24.01.2023 15:17

What a dumb first half of a video. Do you think divers still wear a submariner? Do you think race car drivers still use a chronograph?

Sometimes you don’t need a fresh take on something. Especially when the fresh take is absolutely dumb.

Ответить