James Watson: How we discovered DNA

James Watson: How we discovered DNA

TED

17 лет назад

287,904 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@illel-zorro9527
@illel-zorro9527 - 05.12.2018 20:15

This guy looks senile and ignorant. And overrated, I'm so sorry.

Ответить
@neoepicurean3772
@neoepicurean3772 - 26.12.2018 16:03

Dude is talking about curing cancer and 10 years later what he says is now in use and helping people, and all you lot can complain about is that he didn't give credit to a woman. Typical feminist oppression narrative. Talk about cancer.

Ответить
@CrazyLeiFeng
@CrazyLeiFeng - 13.01.2019 14:04

I salute James Watson for his honesty, courage and scientific integrity. No more academia lies and censorship!

Ответить
@eedobee
@eedobee - 14.01.2019 03:42

I’m sick of even having to address the torrent of feminist bullshit here. 90% of the comments address it. Even if you are on the side of reality and not historical revisionism, we’ve been derailed.

Ответить
@Alianger
@Alianger - 14.01.2019 04:13

Considering he's a race realist/racist, will Ted remove this now?

Ответить
@vuk1419
@vuk1419 - 14.01.2019 17:21

the media and politicians trying their best to kill this guy who helped science, he was fired and all his titles and honours to be taken away when he said Africans IQ level is lower.. political incorrection as it is agenda working to destroy genuine people

Ответить
@nidhisingh-mx6ph
@nidhisingh-mx6ph - 14.01.2019 18:56

here after he was stripped of his titles

Ответить
@ee.es00
@ee.es00 - 16.01.2019 03:26

One of the greatest scientists of modernity. He tells it like it is too.

Ответить
@EchadLevShtim
@EchadLevShtim - 18.03.2019 05:58

I think most are idiots for not at least figuring out that Blue Eye is the most recent 'Out of Africa'. OCA2/HERC2.

Ответить
@oklu_
@oklu_ - 19.03.2019 07:16

You were brilliant those days but you're not a scientist..

Ответить
@harshshuklayt
@harshshuklayt - 25.03.2019 22:34

Why did one of the graphs had CNPs written on it? I guess those should be SNPs since he looks to be talking about Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms. If not, please do help me with what CNPs are, if they are something.

Ответить
@user-iu4yf7sf5c
@user-iu4yf7sf5c - 27.03.2019 20:50

великий Человек

Ответить
@eug3nius
@eug3nius - 23.04.2019 07:02

Liberalism is failure on a genetic level.

Ответить
@cinnamongirl5410
@cinnamongirl5410 - 18.06.2019 01:38

<3

Ответить
@EkraMCadik
@EkraMCadik - 16.07.2019 18:54

ub tk zinda ho ??? me smjhi thi k mar gye r han wesy tm chor ho tmny chori kia ha frecklin wrinklin r chargaff ka stucture DNA ka....r khd nobel price le k beth gye chor........ :p

Ответить
@bigbuggie5
@bigbuggie5 - 01.08.2019 04:02

That's discouraging to hear that it costs 10-20 million dollars to do real research on a disorder to understand it.

Ответить
@bigbuggie5
@bigbuggie5 - 01.08.2019 04:05

I hope you find the gene for bipolar!

Ответить
@josecarlostaveras5730
@josecarlostaveras5730 - 15.11.2019 02:10

Estuvo seguro cndo a traves del ARN pudo sentitezar proteinas esa fue la confirmacion de q el ADN cmo tal era el codigo genetico

Ответить
@laxmanbishtkitchencooking7371
@laxmanbishtkitchencooking7371 - 20.02.2020 18:08

Thanks james watson

Ответить
@reygalo8269
@reygalo8269 - 10.04.2020 09:16

In sum Rosalind Franklin

Ответить
@Josh101fm
@Josh101fm - 14.06.2020 05:26

He looks like an old version of Bill Gates

Ответить
@aliarkan1729
@aliarkan1729 - 03.07.2020 02:51

راح ادرس علم الوراثة من وراكم 😂😂 من عرفت ال DNA لهسة اني وياه بعلاقة غرامية .
Love from Iraq to every scientist who served humanity

Ответить
@yomama8725
@yomama8725 - 21.09.2020 23:00

The amount of people who still believe that these people did not steal and proceed to bash Rosalind Franklin because "She did not know what she was looking at" as if she was not a highly succsessful and precise scientist of her time and her works were accepted by the science community.This is not about feminism or being too offended.This is about bioethics.They exist and to this day these men are judged and their works are not recognized by actual scientist but are believed by people on the internet that accept everything they hear on a ted talk.Rosalind deserves every credit.Yes these men were studying on DNA but they were much behind Rosalind's work.Just give the credit where it is due.Stop defending white,cis men about everything they do.Whether their job is this or that I think we as a community should have already gotten pass the age of boomer logic.That's it loves <3 If you have a different opinion I am open for it but please refrain from attacking and insted come up with facts xoxo

Ответить
@WhiteFox-ce8ep
@WhiteFox-ce8ep - 06.11.2020 08:47

When TED talks weren't cringe.

Ответить
@connor662
@connor662 - 12.01.2021 20:37

i need to make a summary abt him in the video but im too lazy can someone help me

Ответить
@yunusardabasar3443
@yunusardabasar3443 - 14.01.2021 16:12

Düşünsene james watsonu reddeden kızsın..

Ответить
@iliadde
@iliadde - 11.02.2021 23:56

This man is a fraud. He used documents stolen from Rosalin Franklin, true discoverer of the DNA double helix

Ответить
@nyusa74
@nyusa74 - 15.03.2021 04:18

A little humor scattered through a talk is alright. But trying to be a standup comedian while giving a lecture is too much. If I wanted jokes all over a talk I would watch Seinfeld. Weird !

Ответить
@milessalva1947
@milessalva1947 - 15.04.2021 14:11

kinabuhing estudyante mo abot nalang ta aning dapita HHAHAHAA STS bantay lang jud ka HHAHAAH

Ответить
@owenhunt
@owenhunt - 30.04.2021 16:55

Watson: "It was the worst time in my life."

Homie in the audience: 🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂

Ответить
@brinnd330
@brinnd330 - 24.09.2021 08:53

Wait, he was only 77 here? He talks and looks like he escaped the morgue

Ответить
@ignmo2980
@ignmo2980 - 26.09.2021 19:31

dammit Maurice Willkins, you just had to touch that damn paper, look what you have done.

Ответить
@humanseeksjustice8830
@humanseeksjustice8830 - 12.11.2021 15:53

He also said racist things about black people and he and his partner stole much of their ideas (re DNA) from a woman who died and never got her Nobel prize, nor justice.

Ответить
@riskychanges6768
@riskychanges6768 - 03.07.2022 19:12

He is the demonstration that certain truths cannot be said.

Ответить
@tommygilbz
@tommygilbz - 14.07.2022 08:37

Academic people are very poor thinkers. Parents probably were not missing those genes cuz if they had they probaably wouldn’t be parents. Uhhh. If I had money I’d find the gene for left handed was uhhhhh

Ответить
@webster594
@webster594 - 14.07.2022 13:35

Did I miss him mentioning the "Chargaff Rules" ?

Ответить
@Asheyboi987
@Asheyboi987 - 14.09.2022 21:05

Soooooo my teacher told me to take the best 5 facts from this video, my takeaway is that he is clever.

Ответить
@beno.9958
@beno.9958 - 20.02.2023 23:59

WOW! What a smart, witty man. I wish he had gotten the money. He may have found the cure for many diseases. Not good for pharmaceutical companies.

Ответить
@janjantimalsina1465
@janjantimalsina1465 - 07.06.2023 18:18

👏

Ответить
@rintu4569
@rintu4569 - 19.08.2023 22:39

By stealing Franklin's work. He's no genius, just a thief.

Ответить
@GH-oi2jf
@GH-oi2jf - 24.11.2023 01:33

I never understood why anyone considered a 3-strand structure, when two are sufficient to support replication.

Ответить
@H.Lecter
@H.Lecter - 10.12.2023 08:57

Isn't this the thief who stole Franklin's work? yes he is

Ответить
@ReJulien33
@ReJulien33 - 27.04.2024 18:21

great and courageous scientist, he had the honesty to say what everyone knows

Ответить
@ginny1779
@ginny1779 - 18.05.2024 04:12

Thank you Rosalind Franklin.

Ответить
@nairaraika
@nairaraika - 30.05.2024 03:31

Wrong title! It should be How we discovered the structure of DNA

Ответить
@user-fu9mj6xb3g
@user-fu9mj6xb3g - 24.06.2024 10:22

great person i ever seen..thanky you sir watson for your work. genius,,also thanks to f crick ,maurice wilkins and raymond gosling(photograph 51 capturer)

Ответить
@Sarah-vq8gw
@Sarah-vq8gw - 02.07.2024 05:49

Watson and crick stole Rosalind ‘s note lmao

Ответить
@tucuxi70
@tucuxi70 - 02.07.2024 16:49

DNA is a lie. It doesn't exist. The same lab now has a different theory. It is all a false theory!

Ответить
@tucuxi70
@tucuxi70 - 02.07.2024 16:51

DNA does not exist.

Ответить