How to Use Wikipedia Wisely

be wise, support AMERICAN COLLAGE OF PEDIATRICIANS against LGBTQABCXYZ+ propaganda :)

How to use Wikipedia wisely

Step 1: don't

Wikipedia is information presented from a biased and far-left perspective. They decide what is science or pseudoscience. They present information and then decide for you if something is valid or correct or acceptable. Just like Disney and the FBI, I doubt Wikipedia is going to survive the upcoming woke-purge. But then the opportunity will present itself for something better; in all three cases.

How are the ACPeds anti lgbtq just because they don’t want to gays adopting.

Children need both a man and female figure in their life

Wikipedia បានទទួលការព្យាបាលនៃជំងឺបេះដូងចំពោះ

It's better to also look for sources not listed in Wikipedia for any particular subject too!

Love your work SHEG. I've been helping turn the wikipedia ban around. Can you please edit the transcript at 2.17 'and fact checkers don't just examined one source' to 'examine'!

How do I get Wikipedia to read to me in audio ?

Can you please make a video about Encyclopedia Britannica, it seems like there is some bias.

But there is no using Wikipedia correctly

i know

Don't read the NERDS propaganda... Think for yourself... Try editing a wrong or incomplete page, and see how it discriminates against normal people... Wikipedia is the world according to those that never get out of their pizza filled unit... IT IS WRONG...

Finally someone says this! I'm so tired of all the wikipedia hate

Can't help but notice how biased those Wikipedia administrators seem to be. Just read the Hunter Biden entry. Clearly not objective. EVERYTHING has been politicized - especially on the internet. Beware. Love of Truth is at an all-time low. Bernaysian propaganda is the big dog now.

who fact checks the fact-checkers? We're just supposed to blindly trust that the fact-checkers also have no agenda? This is specifically seen through the recent Twitter and Facebook controversies "fact-checking" many conservative opinions, and Twitter itself is a self-proclaimed Liberal, leftist organization. Is this the kind of naivety Stanford is encouraging among undergraduate students?

do you not see the inherent issue with "fact-checkers" or are you too blinded by stupidity?