Комментарии:
pas mal non ? c'est français
ОтветитьWhat cars pass the moose test?
ОтветитьThis might be why parking spots feel smaller lately
ОтветитьI WOKE UP IN A NEW BUGATTI 🔥🔥🔥
ОтветитьWagonR is gone lmao
ОтветитьThe idea that a car roles over when cornering is quite terrifying. Most people can't drive. Ether bought their license or have done it loooong time ago, or recently acquired. There are so many factors that add up, which makes driving a car super unsafe even if you do everyrhing right.
ОтветитьTeslas slay this test. Because safety and engineering are job #1 at Tesla. Looking forward to the Cybertruck results.
ОтветитьHit a deer is bad, hitting a moose is deadly. They are perfect height that when you hit them they come straight through the windshield and you die crushed by a moose carcass. Not a good way to go.
Ответитьnew cars are over priced junk. I know I have worked at new car dealers for the past 30 years. Just retired.
Ответитьwow who would have thought that all these tall, heavy SUV's are bad at corners...
ОтветитьNo joke, large quadripeds will FUCK your car UP.
ОтветитьCheck out Lucid, it’s going to perform much better then all these cars shown in this video .. lucid is an engineering marvel..
Ответитьyou didn't answer the question
ОтветитьCredits to the van who flew.
Ответитьnot a Tesla tho
Ответитьsweden made this test because they knew only a volvo can stand it xD
ОтветитьThe car needs a lower center of gravity for better cornering
Ответитьi think its good that ordinary peaople do these tests and not pros because its not only pros on the real road.
ОтветитьHaving a moose come out is like suddenly hitting a parked 2 ton truck, its insane!!
Ответить0.000005% occurrence test. Avoid 😂
Ответитьthe newer "sportier" cars don't actually lose to the citroen because their suspension or theri stability is worse. Modern cars are just a loooot wider. If you see the video of the citroen, that car is barely more than half the coned lane width. Now if you compare that to a modern amg gt that also does the moose test with over 80kph, it barely fits in the lane. If you dont place it 100% straight, you knock over the cones.
ОтветитьI don't understand this. What cannot fail this test? The faster the car go, the harder to survive this test. No car can pass this test actually.
ОтветитьIf a car failed the moose test, its handling definitely is NOT brilliant. Fun, maybe, but not objectively good.
ОтветитьDid you notice that only suvs and pickup trucks go on 2 wheels or tip over?
Coincidence? I think not.
Easy solution if your going to fast to slow down or "swurve" safely. Don't be a fucking idiot and swurve the safest option for you and everyone else is to hit somthing that's infront of you.
ОтветитьHaving just performed a moose test at 65 mph to dodge a Honda right next to us who suddenly decided to violently slam into our lane (by which I mean the side of our car), moose test will certainly account for a big proportion of our consideration for future cars. Oh by the way we have a Stelvio, which performed really well in moose test.
ОтветитьNew SUV's, not new cars... that are no longer manufactured.
Ответитьthat's because cars are no longer made for safety but for dick measuring contests
ОтветитьÕMĞ é PôWéŘ-PhÛľĽ MûřŘíĶâŃś
ОтветитьStrangely? No EXPECTED. The consumer wanted shit upright boxy crossovers and then started driving like idiots... tailgating, aggressive and impatient. Of course roll- overs are happening. This isn't rocket science.
Ответитьmajority of people shouldn't have a driver's license, idk why its so easy to get
Ответитьo comentario brasileiro !!!!! overtake!!!
ОтветитьAs a Tennesseean whose sister was nearly killed when a deer jumped on her windshield, I can verify the importance of this test.
Ответитьfail because its a suv, its harder to control at high speeds.
ОтветитьThis sounds like the Bechdel test of automotive safety. Sure, you're measuring SOMETHING, but is it a metric that relates to the actual safety of the automobile? Is the context realistic? Yes, swerving in an emergency isn't uncommon, but as mentioned that will be accompanied by slamming on the brakes 99% of instances, and that alters the results to the point that makes this test moot.
Ответить"SUVs struggle with this test."
Understandable since SUVs are shit at everything except killing pedestrians.
Bad tires, center of gravity, “comfy” suspension, and overall just being boats.
ОтветитьThe problem with the Moose test, is that they keep the speed trough the test. I've never kept the speed when coming up on moose running over the road 😅 As a Swede I can say the Moose test is as outdated as Blockbusters in murica
ОтветитьAnother L for SUVs
ОтветитьTime to buy a Xantia
ОтветитьIts actually sad that the Citroen found THE solution and it wasnt used since ...
ОтветитьN0t cars... new drivers are failing as they dont know about the inertia... they need to study and feel some physics... they need to sync their body and machine to feel it
ОтветитьI don't think anyone is using a full steering lock to avoid something. Kind of a dumb test
ОтветитьCars are getting wider, heavier, and more top-heavy. Especially trucks.. they’ve been ordering big Macs every day for 10 years. Huge!
Ответитьno mention of the Jimny? poor thing got so hard done by in this test
Ответитьwhy would one have professional drivers carry out these tests? 99.999999999% of people on public roads are nowhere near that skill level
ОтветитьSadly in the USA, People don't pay enough attention to the road these days for it to matter, that or they are stuck in bumper to bumper gridlock.
That's what a family car should be about. Safety, really cool to see the results. I honestly thought it would have been an M class BMW. I'd love to see a 4 wheel steering dodge stealth results ( if you can find one anywhere )