Комментарии:
Best minute and a half of my life! For being such a simple compound, I was baffled for an embarrassingly long time trying to figure out what to do with it
Ответить❤
ОтветитьI thought there was a coordinate bond too
ОтветитьI really appreciate your brilliant explanation. Although my mother tongue is not English but I understood because you explained perfectly. Thank you so much
Ответить10 years of helping a kid
ОтветитьBeautiful explanation
ОтветитьWrong
ОтветитьWow, thank you for the video Sir.
ОтветитьI can't understand!! Please help me..
ОтветитьI was confused about this alot
Thank you so much
your explanation was shite
Ответить10 Years later, this video is still helping students. Thank you.
ОтветитьIt is wrong structure
ОтветитьThank you sir my school teacher couldn't explain it properly
ОтветитьThanks ❤
ОтветитьThat's the fukkin' way she goes, boys.
ОтветитьDoes no one realize how this is completely wrong
ОтветитьI honestly still don't understand because one bond represents two electrons bonded , one from oxygen the other from carbon....in this case we have 3 bonds meaning 3e from oxygen bonded with 3e from carbon and when you add the electrons around the C atom it now sums up to 5e when include the lone pair of electrons or are we suppose to assume that the electron pair from the O atom was shared amongst the two atoms and the two atoms didn't meet each other half way such that one atom brings one and the other brings one to form a bond?
ОтветитьBest way of explaining!
ОтветитьBut o to 2bond karta h
ОтветитьThanks 👍
ОтветитьWhat is about charge produced on the atoms in molecule?
Ответитьshouldn't CO have 2 coordinate bonds then ?
Ответитьits wrong totally wrong
ОтветитьGood explanation thank you
ОтветитьThis seems wrong as the structure that you have drawn shows five electrons in carbon’s valence shell and again five electrons in oxygen’s valence shell, which is not possible right ?
ОтветитьLots of love from India🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
ОтветитьNice
ОтветитьThank you sir
I don't know English very well
But I understand this very easily ❣️
this bonds is so wrong in the tet books , cause this is not a covalent bond , there are coordinate bonds as well here , there is a covalent double bond and 2 coordinate bonds ,
Ответитьthe first bond is a coordinate bond as oygen dosent share anything
ОтветитьThanks a lot.
ОтветитьYou a badass man
Ответитьthanks buddy
ОтветитьGreat
ОтветитьLegend are watching 2022
ОтветитьBut wait :q Now oxygen and carbon both still have formal charges :q Shouldn't we cancel them? :q
ОтветитьOh I couldn't understood this before thnaku very much for ur clear explain ♥️
ОтветитьYou save my life! Thank you!!!!! You explained very very well
ОтветитьThank you very much
Ответитьexplained ina minute what my chem. professor didn't manage to do in 2 hours
ОтветитьThis got me through some tough times thanks chemist Nate I luv you
ОтветитьWhat about formal charge? Doesn’t the carbon need only 4 electrons right around and the oxygen needs only 6 electrons right around it?
Ответитьwhy dont u make 4 pounds betwean them and o (oxcegen) take the left pair ????....please tell me I need help
ОтветитьHi
ОтветитьBut how do you know to automatically fill oxygen with as much as possible first? Because it's more electro negative? Is this always the case? What I mean is, why not start out with the single bond, then putting only 5 around oxygen and 3 around carbon as would be according to their respective valence electrons?
ОтветитьThank you 🙏🙏🙏
ОтветитьBut how oxygen can make 3 bonds?
ОтветитьThanks
ОтветитьWow❤️
Ответить