In Conversation with Dr David D. Friedman

The existence of the government is not the problem. Oppression by the government is the problem. In an anarcho-capitalist there is no safeguard against oppression by a private individual. We've seen all kinds of tyrants in history and the state has been their tool. But nothing prevents a tyrant from rising in a anarcho-capitalist society to oppress all people without a government.

I'm exploring this philosophy because I have realised that I do much better by DIYing the education process, once you got the fundamentals and know how to search on the internet you can basically outlaw the middle-man, and if you know where to look for regarding valuable courses for upskilling, you are basically head of the herd competition. The internet is also gold mine of white papers and educational materials. There are also other centralised operations that do more harm than good...fascinating theory I want to delve into further.

"Indians are hard working" yes at basic and rudimentary work and they consistently vote left. They are not good for the country

This is complete nonsense. Total Anarchy yeah, that’ll work.

I have to give my praise to the interviewer. Very well posed questions.

The Law is discovered trough scientific means and not created.

What is created is simply excuses to justify ones own crimes.

Like it’s sister ideology Communism, it’s a way for Jews to carve up what is otherwise decent society into its component parts so they can exploit it.

I am new to this so I’m sure this is a newbie question but I am wondering how militaries would function under this system. With no central government I can only guess that militaries would also be private but where would the intense funding come from required to compete with adversaries with central governments and collecting taxes to fund their militaries?

Brilliant philosophy ❤

David D Friedman is amongst one of the greatest minds of our time. Anarcho capitalism absolutely could work and by “work” I mean it would be much much better than socialism or the system we have now. No system could ever be entirely flawless but this system is very well thought out, practical, tactical and freeing.

It’s all about freedom.

Under Anarcho-Capitalistism, how do search warrants work? Child & Animal Protection Services? Prohibition of chlorofluorocarbons?

For many centuries, England relied, in part, on Common Law, case-made law that maintained its existence through time by the use of precedent. Worked well, and has only recently* begun to be supplanted by statute law and, until very recently, EU 'directives'.

*By recently, I mean in the last 500 years or so.

lol, this bitch, Ben Shapiro light is your communications officer? That make so much sense.

Free trade might be good, but free movement of welfare recipients is not.

How does Anarcho-Capitalism differ from Free-Market Anarchism?

If this system would work why hasn’t it emerged already? There are windows within existing set of laws for this system to begin working and then the state can wither away as there is less and less need for it.

I'm all for it

Friedman is not a true anarchist, he admits this in the very first sentence uttered in this video.

Always interesting to hear some out of the box thinking.

Ps - Towards the end the host compares Buckleys assertion that heroin addiction was a contagious disease to 'right wing' speculation that the rise in Trans identification is a social contagion as though both are equally baseless. It irks me when someone confidently opines on a topic they're clearly not that familiar with.

The unprecedented rise and the change in which sex is affected (used to be a male phenomenon, is now mainly a female one) along with an obvious vector (social medial) is what drives the absolutely reasonable speculation. This is not novel either. Anorexia likewise had a rapid rise in the 2000s. Kids literally aquire Tourettes ticks from tiktok influences. Go read about the rise in self diagnosed multiple personality disorders among teens who regularly browsed Tumblr. Acting like speculation about social contagion can just be dismissed is just ignorant.

(OH and BTW, the phrase Trans Rights is so weasely. You'd think one was trying to take their speech or property rights away when you hear it

When really it is people objecting to their kids being taught baseless Gender ideology, being socially transitioned without their knowledge, kids being put on experimental treatments like puberty blockers that have long term effects which they cannot possibly comprehend (especially considering both their effectiveness AND the number of people who detransition are literally not known), males being granted access to female exclusive spaces where they're vulnerable, to female specific activities where they have an overwhelming advantage etc etc)