Комментарии:
There are formats that have better quality for a given size reduction than JPEG. The reason JPEG is so much used is that every current software can read them. If you need to add the artifact remover AI to get back the quality, you may just as well just use a better format in the first place.
ОтветитьLove this channel
ОтветитьWebP is better!!!!
ОтветитьJPEG is the superior format. JPEG-XL, that is
ОтветитьWhen is the Mosaic Restoration Player coming out?
ОтветитьIs there any AI which can apply motion blur in clips like RSMB
Ответитьitd be interesting using this in an ffmpeg method to do it on videos with bad quality
ОтветитьThis is good for many projects basically cause I don't know how to take photos in RAW .
ОтветитьNah, keep Elon compressed, he doesn't deserve this it.
ОтветитьWould be interesting to try running low res jpg images through this model at a modest QF before upscaling with super resolution. Would using this model as an initial "clean up" result in fewer upscaling artefacts?
ОтветитьIve been using pngs for the past decade for a reason. Never was a fan of jpegs.
ОтветитьNord vpn has been a real disappointment. Cool videos though!
ОтветитьNow we need a image compressor that is optimized to compress images so that an AI can clean the artifacts.
Ответитьyeah that's a better thumbnail 👍
ОтветитьWebp is better anyways.
ОтветитьIt is exactly what I want recently! so nice guy!
ОтветитьHmm, I remember when people tried to find the seed for the Minecraft texture pack icon, they somehow reversed the compression algorithm on that image. I wonder how that worked!
ОтветитьJPEG compression can be used like carbon-dating for pictures on the internet
ОтветитьHm sucks there's no easy way.
ОтветитьLiterally just add some anti aliasing and we are there!!
Ответить