Everything You Need to Know About Isotopes

Everything You Need to Know About Isotopes

StarTalk

6 месяцев назад

374,640 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@StarTalk
@StarTalk - 03.01.2024 01:14

What did you learn about Isotopes?

Ответить
@bobygunarso8833
@bobygunarso8833 - 14.01.2024 13:09

Thank you very much for the great explanation, Neil! You are the best! 😊

Ответить
@ayush20019
@ayush20019 - 14.01.2024 11:52

Loved the thumbnail

Ответить
@LivinginthePacific
@LivinginthePacific - 14.01.2024 11:51

Neil, you just made me want to go back to H.S.

Ответить
@bartvanleeuwen3842
@bartvanleeuwen3842 - 13.01.2024 17:17

Ummm I thought I knew about this but it’s confusing me now. Neil’s explanation is always understandable but this time I’m not following….😮

Ответить
@user-ul5pt1yb8z
@user-ul5pt1yb8z - 13.01.2024 14:50

Thanks a lot

Ответить
@braaaaaja
@braaaaaja - 13.01.2024 03:14

Hey startalk, your shows are awesome. Can you take out that noisy guy out of your show. He is very irritating.

Ответить
@psychomd1939
@psychomd1939 - 12.01.2024 23:59

Allegedly, they are 6-foot 3-inches, weigh 215 pounds, have orange-colored skin and can't master the English language.

Ответить
@songchxn6911
@songchxn6911 - 12.01.2024 18:51

Woah now I know what my chemistry teacher was talking about

Ответить
@kavorka8855
@kavorka8855 - 12.01.2024 12:50

Neil's eyes almost identical to Einstein's, I guess from thinking too much about almost everything!

Ответить
@pkwithmeplease
@pkwithmeplease - 12.01.2024 08:05

😂 please publish something in the past 20 years thats worthwhile please.

Ответить
@mjmorriplymouth
@mjmorriplymouth - 12.01.2024 07:18

The is some evidence for natural Plutonium element 94.

Ответить
@PedroMartinez-nv7mz
@PedroMartinez-nv7mz - 12.01.2024 05:20

Great explanation, thanks

Ответить
@Shyam-ku4kn
@Shyam-ku4kn - 12.01.2024 04:12

We are black shyam

Ответить
@Shyam-ku4kn
@Shyam-ku4kn - 12.01.2024 03:47

We are Black shyam

Ответить
@Wkirkleyiphone
@Wkirkleyiphone - 11.01.2024 07:23

But, how do you know the number of carbon fourteen atoms at the time of death of the organism? Aren't you using present day number of carbon 14 atoms compared to the number at time if death to do the dating?

Ответить
@manyakus8919
@manyakus8919 - 11.01.2024 05:56

This guy is not a scientist...he is an activist

Ответить
@Shadismic
@Shadismic - 11.01.2024 04:15

The greatest show on earth 😍

Ответить
@semanavidi8694
@semanavidi8694 - 11.01.2024 01:58

Great source of science, thanks Dr. Tyson and the other gentleman.

Ответить
@vince8436
@vince8436 - 10.01.2024 23:31

How does one remember all those facts?

Ответить
@mhsandifer
@mhsandifer - 10.01.2024 22:11

Shutup, Kneel

Ответить
@user-zq3bq7jk3r
@user-zq3bq7jk3r - 10.01.2024 20:11

Wow😮 a lot of knowledge 😊

Ответить
@chicotruco
@chicotruco - 10.01.2024 13:44

all this sound like a bunch of BS to me

Ответить
@taylortaylor5542
@taylortaylor5542 - 10.01.2024 10:11

I can recall studying Organic Chemistry and Inorganic Chemistry (separate courses), so intensely. Then I went to the grocer and there was a whole new section of foods. It said, "ORGANIC FRUITS & VEGETABLES".
I stood right there and cried. 😭😂😭😂😭😭😭😭😭

Ответить
@taylortaylor5542
@taylortaylor5542 - 10.01.2024 10:06

Decays...
'Ashes to ashes, dust to dust.'

Ответить
@taylortaylor5542
@taylortaylor5542 - 10.01.2024 10:04

A refresher courrse of sorts.
My Instructors cheated on isotopes especially.
But GLUCON?

I' m hungry.

Ответить
@whatabouttheearth
@whatabouttheearth - 10.01.2024 00:37

The ratio between carbon isotopes is one of the reasons we know damn well that fossil fuels are the cause of the increase in atmospheric CO2.

CO2 is "non transparent' to the frequency of exiting reflected solar radiation. Increased atmospheric CO2 blocks reflected solar radiation thereby trapping it within earths atmosphere at an increasing rate causing an increased trend in warming.

Look up the 'Seuss Effect'. Atmospheric 12C and 13C isotopes have increased in the same ratio found in plants, but NOT the radioactive 14C which means that the vast majority of atmospheric CO2 increase we are seeing is due to an ancient plant where the radioactive isotope has already depleted. This can only be one thing, fossil fuels, primarily coal from the Carboniferous and Permian periods of the Paleozoic. (14C isotopes increase in the 50s due to nuclear testing but after the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty of 1963 began to "decrease" causing us to be able to discern that offset, really that "decrease" was the increase in 12C from fossil fuels).

Plants in the Carboniferous period of the late Paleozoic developed lignan but decomposers had not yet evolved the ability to decompose, to eat, lignan, so these plants went through diagenesis in swamps to become coal.
---------------------------------
Atmospheric CO2-
1977 - 333ppm
2002- 365ppm
2022 - over 420ppm
---------------------------------
FOSSIL FUELS:

Petroleum ("gas") = fossil plants (phytoplankton such as diatoms (algae), and animals (zooplankton).

Coal = fossil plants (Carboniferous and Permian periods mainly)

"Natural" gas (BS marketing name) = fossil anoxic decomposers

...at no point are dinosaurs involved.

Ответить
@whatabouttheearth
@whatabouttheearth - 09.01.2024 23:39

Carbon isotopic analysis is one of the primary reasons we know for sure that it is fossil fuels that are causing the increase in atmospheric CO2

Look up the 'Seuss Effect'. Atmospheric 12C and 13C isotopes have increased in the same ratio found in plants, but NOT the radioactive 14C which means that the vast majority of atmospheric CO2 increase we are seeing is due to an ancient plant where the radioactive isotope has already depleted. This can only be one thing, fossil fuels, primarily coal from the Carboniferous and Permian periods of the Paleozoic. (14C isotopes increase in the 50s due to nuclear testing but after the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty of 1963 began to "decrease" causing us to be able to discern that offset, really that "decrease" was the increase in 12C from fossil fuels).

Ответить
@TihoDownTheTube
@TihoDownTheTube - 09.01.2024 20:06

Lets say something is 100000 years old. How do you know how much C14 it had to start with? I get half life but don't get being sure of starting amount.

Ответить
@ScottCleve33
@ScottCleve33 - 09.01.2024 19:46

How can we tell if he's giving the scientific answer or the correct woke answer?

Ответить
@user-jl2wd1it8h
@user-jl2wd1it8h - 09.01.2024 19:42

My cousin Mugalu tried to speak out about Degrass and how rude he was when talking over the top of people. He was attacked by hired goons who landed heavy kicks to his groin

Ответить
@antonioquesada-castro4925
@antonioquesada-castro4925 - 09.01.2024 16:03

go, go, Isotopes...

Ответить
@ElDiablo223
@ElDiablo223 - 09.01.2024 09:59

What a great explanation, thank you.

Ответить
@kyleburkholder6003
@kyleburkholder6003 - 09.01.2024 05:54

I was following the math up until you guys started taking Bout the 1/2 life of carbon14. How do we know what the half life of something is when we are selfes have not been studying this information for 5000 years

Ответить
@dream-_weaver4769
@dream-_weaver4769 - 09.01.2024 04:47

Now why couldn't someone explain it this way in high school?

Ответить
@amuaiz
@amuaiz - 09.01.2024 03:50

Im bad at chemistry

Ответить
@araiaf
@araiaf - 09.01.2024 00:57

Thanks!

Ответить
@manishsemwal5
@manishsemwal5 - 08.01.2024 20:57

If C-14 has a half-life of let's say 5000 years, how could we possibly guess the correct age of something which is 7500 years old? Since C-14 becomes C-7 in 5000 years and C-7 becomes C-3 or C-4 in another 5000 years. So, we may only guess the age of things in multiples of 5000 only, is that correct?

Ответить
@yodaiam1000
@yodaiam1000 - 08.01.2024 20:09

Why does life create carbon 14 from carbon 12? Is it from photosynthesis and do marine artifacts have less carbon 14 than expected (they appear older than they are)?

Ответить
@EF-69
@EF-69 - 08.01.2024 06:19

You ask carbon for a date. It turns you down but you keep trying. Silicon convinces carbon to go out with you and finally says yes. It's a typical dinner & movie. Carbon has a good time & agrees to keep seeing you. After a few more outings you are now carbon dating.

Ответить
@gunnerbitcoin6424
@gunnerbitcoin6424 - 08.01.2024 03:53

Neil deGrasse Tyson for President.🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇲

Ответить
@Lew114
@Lew114 - 08.01.2024 01:35

Neil deGrasse Tyson is an amazing communicator and educator. I still whimsically blame him for destroying the planet Pluto though. My nickname for him is "Death Star". :)

Ответить
@morkey74
@morkey74 - 07.01.2024 22:21

Surprised he didn't talk about O3 or ozone generators and how it eliminates smells.

Ответить
@larryb.8065
@larryb.8065 - 07.01.2024 18:27

Outstanding video! What are your thoughts on nuclear rearrangements to reduce radioactive waste?

Ответить
@dzzedge
@dzzedge - 07.01.2024 12:26

Cool.

Ответить
@jameshedden2260
@jameshedden2260 - 07.01.2024 12:08

Carbon-14: the dating app for scientists and science enthusiasts

Ответить
@glenmartin2437
@glenmartin2437 - 07.01.2024 07:06

Good, fun, and educational.

Ответить
@KellyRae..
@KellyRae.. - 07.01.2024 02:35

Disrespectful to women and Mother Nature. Damn. Beta decay in the brain 🧠 toxic behavior ☣️🫠

Ответить
@sicZ32
@sicZ32 - 07.01.2024 02:06

Lol this dude is funny 😂

Ответить
@jirace
@jirace - 07.01.2024 02:02

Scientist that discovered carbon dating came from my high school, Analy High in Sebastopol, CA.

Ответить