Комментарии:
the 2 ascension perks won’t show up for me mind over matter and the other one (i’m new to stelarris) i have almost no clue what i’m doing i need help
ОтветитьAs of 2023, aquatics now cost 2 points instead of 1. If you want to do this build, you may have to take the non-adaptive trait, that is one of the only other traits to get you two points back to get the intelligent trait. One of the natural science traits may be a good substitute as well if you wish to keep deviants.
ОтветитьI literally insta rolled psionic theory wth
ОтветитьMaybe I’m wrong but psionic is a biology tech so why not take the perk that makes you research social/biology tech faster ? This means you can get it faster and learn it quicker.
ОтветитьIs it possible to clear the ships on console?
ОтветитьOnly Montu would use the aquatic perk on the lion portrait, hydrokitty psychics ftw.
ОтветитьWith Aquatic cost now at 2 points, what is recommended trair combo now? Starting a game now where I dropped Rapid Breeders' 2 points and picked up Natural Engineers instead. Comments?
ОтветитьThere’s a “light” side of stellaris?
Ответитьthe way he says aquatic xd
ОтветитьMe, about to ask how to synth rush, knowing damn well I’m gonna be told the exact thing that I’m already doing or get called a heretic;
Ответить.......
ОтветитьCan I use this on Console now that its come out?
ОтветитьHow do you get the pops to support this strategy? If I do everything to the letter as in this video, I just wind up with dozens upon dozens of unworked jobs and a broken economy.
ОтветитьLol water cats
ОтветитьAquatic now costing 2 making it impossible to take Aquatic, Rapid Breeders & Intelligent, I've actually created this species now with Aquatic, Breeders and Traditional. Curious to know what you'd consider to be the best choice for this now. Was thinking about 'theming' it a bit better for RP and swapping Breeders for Intelligent but I feel like the 20% pop growth (Spiritual/breeder) is just better than the 20% research synergy between Latent and Intelligent.
Ответитьcant figure it out, why does your start have an extra trait point? I start with 2 not 3 so I can't pick the same traits you have.
ОтветитьFilthy Zealots. The Machine is powerful. The Machine is Eternal.
Paradox please give us Vanilla Planetary Computer
i can make a jedi/sith order
ОтветитьDid I hear Standard Construct Template. I am starting to sweat, my dendrites are getting heavy.
Ответитьnot to mention, in 3.6 there is no transcendence perk anymore, it is a tradition tree instead, so in essence, before this origin, you had 6 perks available to you (2 where locked) with this origin you had a a "fake" ninth perk, and with the tree now you have 10 "perks" and due to the new shroud mechanics you can decide on your own (no more rng bs hoping to land a pact with a specific entity) which one you want, (except end of the cycle)
ОтветитьVoid dwellers :) and we have to pray for shroud enclave :)
ОтветитьThey've killed the alloy shuffle at the very beginning of the games and aquatic is now 2 trait points. Or...am I missing something? (playing 3.6 beta)
ОтветитьThanks Montu very useful. One remark I have, trick with ships doesn't work in 3.5 anymore, but build works fine at least against bots.
ОтветитьIs it possible to Shroud origin and still tech rush? can not figure out how. keep failing :(
Ответитьmatireialist is a bad idea unless technocracy, robot uprisings arnt worth it
ОтветитьMaking Psionic Theory great again.
Ответитьwhat difficulty level is this for? I tried this on admiral and got wiped in 10 years, found my first suitable planet to settle after 5 years, then invaded by a megacorp neighbor with subjugation cb
ОтветитьYour movie editing is genius.
ОтветитьHow do you handle conquered species? Assimilate them to psi as well?
ОтветитьOne of my Scientists was "Chosen" and became immortal . . . . He promptly died at age 97.
ОтветитьI'm running this origin with feudal society and slaver guilds. The unity is insane. I'm pretty sure feudal society is better than any +x% unity because it gives you 10 extra unity per month right from the start. I'm using domestic servitude to create amenities. And now I want to try this build and enslave a bunch of materialists to get the faction and try to flip materialist in the first few decades. Flip the unity rush into a tech rush, ditch feudal society and pickup technocrasy
ОтветитьI am just starting to play this game and I have so much to learn. Going to play an overpowered origin and try this method so I can learn the basics of conquest and vassals. Have to watch the next vid as well to learn how to min max my planets better.
Ty for the tips Montu.
did developers update requirements to transcendence? Followed the guide and wasn't able to unlock ~ newer Stellaris player here~
ОтветитьThe Bene Gesserit act as if they were Spiritualists, but in reality and secrecy they really aren't. :D
ОтветитьCan't wait to create an insectoid Roman empire with the force powers. Truly the best
ОтветитьI always go expansion for first tradition, im doing it wrong?
ОтветитьHow do I get rid of aquatic in game?
ОтветитьI always played shroud, even if it was the worst one. I just loved the flavor!
ОтветитьHere comes a StarCraft playthrough. Made Zerg and Terran as well should be fun
Ответитьah, yes
aquatic cats
Do you think issues from empire size should scale depending on the size of galaxy you play on?
ОтветитьMost of my gameplay, where's my psionics....
Robotic and genetics: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Me who played Spiritualist before it was meta:
ОтветитьI mean, if you're willing to sacrifice your precursor relic you can explore and only scan habitable worlds, forcing the Zro dudes to spawn. Unless I'm missing something.
ОтветитьI don't like how latent psionic gives increased science output. It negates the difference between spiritual and materialist.
ОтветитьI'm a bit confused between the origins. What is the difference between Shroud Touched, and Teachers of the shroud?
ОтветитьDoes the shroud tunnel or "what is my fate" do anything worthwhile?
Ether as a normal or teachers origin?
i never even survive through the 20s though ...
Ответить