Is Dark Matter Made of Particles?

For so may reasons black holes are macro scale particles

What if dark matter is primordial black holes? Possibly of a size range we've never seen before?

So dark matter is anti gravity? Therefore the gravitational properties we observe and associate with dark matter are actually the gravitational reflections in our dimension of the phenomena that causes anti gravity? Hmmmm

From a general layman's mind. If dark matter particles don't interact with each other...I am fine with that...but both particles still have mass. And if they are "cold " would they not clump?

Are we absolutely sure, dark matter isn't just simply photons "in transit"?

Since dark matter is so weak and abundant... Would it be easier to think of dark matter as a field 🤔

Can they modify CERN to detect produced dark matter 🤔

Can we use anti dark matter to trap dark matter 🤔

a hoonter must hoont, even if it's that dark

Imagine if we are ghosts existing in the afterlife while dark matter actually makes up the "real" world of the living.

oh i really hate when someone wants to be in the videos like this dude, we do not want to see your square head talking in the video , we want to see the CONTENT , not you!!! come on ! man.. it really is annoying ,

What about something like a molecular sized neutron stars.

One of your most intriguing videos for sure!

"dark matter" = dirt.

Does anyone know if Gravitons are a viable candidate for dark matter and if/if not why?

Naw, it's made of phlogiston.

Is space growing, or are we shrinking relative to space

Are primordial particles the make-up for black holes, which in turn bind and structure our universe. And, is the visible matter eaten by black holes, then spat out, giving the power needed to help propel and accelerate galaxies away from one another?

'Dark matter' should be renamed Gravitational Anomalous Phenomena or GAP since that's all it is - a gap in our knowledge that requires invention of unpredicted and (thus far) undetected magic matter.

I am so scared 😂

Dark matter exists, but it’s invisible. Dark matter exists, but we can’t measure it directly. Dark matter exists, but no instrument can detect it. Dark matter exists, but it cannot absorb, reflect, or emit any radiation. In other words, dark matter exists even if it not really there.

Hey ik I'm two years lateso hopefully this will be seen still lol but like what if dark matter and dark energy are just expired white dwarfs or other type body that is just dark and we cant see? Does the math say that's possible or is it just a layman's random hypothesis

I'm going to assume you know that gravity slows down the centre of galaxies, the rotation speed or the rate we perceive it. I know your not just looking at the outer stars of the galaxies and thinking " why are those outer stars moving faster than our models and calculations predict" because that would be silly.

Imagine if we detected dark matter particles and briefly thought our troubles were solved, but then we realized that the new particle only accounted for half of the observed dark matter

Question: Photons are transferring force between charged particles. Do Photons differ when they transfer repulsion from the ones that transfer attraction?

Thank you for doing these. It's really hard for the average person to get real information about this stuff. It's nice to be able to understand the evidence and know that it's not all just guesses

Im a dark matter people next halloween!

A dark matter particle by nature has to be a baryonic acoustic oscillation attosecond that created photons, spacetime (not ur show) & speed of gravity as it were.

Geat time dilation explanation but why r u still mortal?

Sneutrino has got to be a candidate for worst scientific name of all time

Ok show me just 1

No, dark matter is made up of a collective misunderstanding of what gravity actually is and does.

I bet future astrophysicists will find it quaint that we spent billions trying to find imaginary particles instead of adjusting our theories of gravity

could dark matter be light?

HUUM!? YOUR REFERENCES ABOUT ENERGY EVOLUTION DURING ALL! PARTICLE CONSTRUCTION! IS CLEAR BUT THEN PROCEED TO DISREGARD THE UNRECOGNIZE MECHANICS OF ANY OTHER ENERGY STATES!! THAT DID'NT REPLICATETHE FUNDAMENTALS OF THE INTERESTED ONE'S!! TELLS ME THAT YOU'RE LAZY!!..

Gravity and mass ain't same. Gravity is product of energy (including mass).

We just have "dark" energy (including matter)

It is the opinion of this author that dark matter can be considered to be made of particles, just not standard model particles.

The evidence of dark matter is overwhelming. Sadly the evidence for the standard model particle of dark matter is completely lacking. Here's the problem. Dark Matter has been around for far longer than standard model particles. Since they are so old and slow moving and neutral and massive they are not found just anywhere. In fact they tend to be found only at the centers of large massive objects like stars and planets and moons and the like. Otherwise, they are found in the halos of galaxies. The exception would seem to be large massive yet fragmented objects, such as the asteroid belt protoplanet between Mars and Jupiter. The masses of dark matter particles may well have several varieties from the least massive and youngest to the most massive and oldest. The least massive and youngest may well fall into the logarithmic scale proportional to that between Gravity and Electromagnetism. This is the hierarchical scale with Hadronic and Leptonic quarks at one end, the bottom end of this scale. This spans 10^36 in a scale proportional to the relative number of dimensions applying to this scale. Clearly there must be several dimensions in this scale. Approximately 7 dimensions seems to be the least massive divisision of this logarithmic scale that makes any sense. Applying a natural scale suggests that at minimum 1/18 of 36 or about 10^2 times as massive as quarks for the least massive initial stages or types of forms of dark matter, while 1/7 of 36 or about 10^5 or more times as massive as quarks for the most massive forms of the initial stages or types of dark matter. Consequentially, small quantities of this novel form of dark matter should be able to be detected, then found, isolated, formally discovered, transported, refined and manufactured. Obviously research and developments in the asteroid belt are going to be instrumental in this discovery. The slow pace of space exploration seems to mean that it's going to be a while before we get this discovery at long last. Of course, the future of dark matter doesn't really begin until its formal discovery, so we'll have to wait till then, whenever that may be.

part 2
Ok. So the Chrysanthemum or Mum, sometimes called the Mon when depicted in art, can now be understood in terms of highly temporary but sometimes long lived quark models.
It is sometimes well established that early versions of the mum were constricted within 2 dimensions. They were strongly limited, apparently limited to about 21 petals, as predicted by Fibonnacci. However, in later Mon depictions, full blown 3 dimensional mums have been depicted and are apparently grown and are flourishing. These are much larger than previous 2 dimensional models.
In counterpart, quark models in the standard model have far exceeded the dark matter models contemplated. For instance, Charm quarks are over 600 times larger than standard Up quarks, and Bottom quarks are over 400 times bigger than standard Strange quarks.
In previous models of the Fibonacci model of quark expansion, the numbers (10^2 to 10^5) are well known and within the known potential of this dimension of dark matter.
We can expect this dimension of dark matter stable components within isolated dark matter, such as within isolated galactic halos. However, trapped dark matter components such as within stars, planets and moons may be decaying quickly, as exhibited by our own Moon, which has shut down and become locked in its gravitationally stabilized orbit, and the planets Mercury and perhaps even Mars, which apparently have also slowed down, and headed for stopping. This energetic model is shocking, and further dark matter and similar quark models, may be decaying or already gone, so the Mum/Mon model will be an important strategic exploration and investigation.
I like the Chrysanthemum model for quarks anyway. It depicts the exponential growth of standard model quarks that we have already seen. However, I think we will see a plateauing of such quark expansions, I think the upper limit of further discoveries such as within the Cern Large Hadron Collider may be reached at about 10,000 times the mass of standard model Up quarks.
Spoiler Alert: There may be some new quarks within this range. However, some dimensions or ranges of dark matter quarks may already have expired and would only be available at galactic scales of discovery and investigation.
So dark matter research may still have local frontiers to discover, but may stall at this range.
The good news is that we have an extremely long time to do this research and discovery of standard model quarks before dark energy expansion catches up with us.
Relax. It's cool.
I hope that you have enjoyed this Fibonacci mathematical Chrysanthemum experiment in both quarks and dark matter.
Thank you for reading.


part 3

Ok. So we are now assuming the Fibonnacci based Chrysanthemum model of hyperdimensional dark matter and quarks.
Or we still have sluggards or Luddites who can't keep up.
In this assumptive model, this structure suggests that such matter would be in the range of 10^5 to 10^8 times the mass of standard model quarks. For regular folks this is from 10,000 times to 100,000,000 times this mass.
That is really close to the neutron star category of matter.
While this may be amusing consider where this is going, the next phase of dark matter and as yet undiscovered quark masses would have to be in the range of 10^13 to 10^21, or 1,000,000,000,000 to 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 quark masses. Is this in the range of black holes yet? Or are we still stalled at very large neutron stars? Again we must pause and consider where we are.
The first stages of dark matter is from 10^2 to 10^3 masses, the 2nd stage would be from 10^3 to 10^5 masses, the 3rd stage would be from 10^5 to 10^8 masses, and the 4th stage would be from 10^8 masses to 10^13 masses. Whew. Theoretically the 5th stage of dark matter would be 10^13 to 10^21 masses. That still leaves us with the 6th stage of the mass of dark matter and quarks. This is the staggering number of 10^21 to 10^34 masses for quarks and dark matter. Wow. This is clearly the end of our Chrysanthemum dark matter models. It is also the end of our hierarchical mass models. What comes after the end of our Electromagnetism model? I dare not postulate. But I suspect outer space models of dark energy. This is the incredible range of from 10^34 to 10^55 masses, a gut wrenching number
times the mass of standard model quarks.
This is the amount of masses that represents the beginning or the ending of the universe.
It's not just a black hole.
It's the end.
Sorry - not sorry.

Gravity is a function of the laws of thermodynamics.

I really want to hear more about the idea of dark sector with an entire panteon of particles and force carrying 'dark bosons' I know it all all speculative for now but still so exciting.

Dark matter is gravity !!!! Gravity is dark matter!!! Not particles!!!

Dark matter doesn't exist

내가 고등학교 때 습득한 과학지식은 우주공간은 원자로 이루어져 있으며 완전유전체 물질수지공간이다 질량보존의 법칙이 기본법칙이다 중력 빅뱅 배경복사 팽창 등 등 일어나지 않으며 원자 자기력으로 움직인다 이것이 암흑 에너지다 자기장이 있는 물질이 회전을 하게 되면 내부의 압력으로 열이 발생하면 지구의 용암 태양의 홍염 코로나 태양풍 흑점과 같은 현상이 일어나고 자기장은 자기장의 가두기로 타고있으며 블랙홀의 중심은 메타물질과 같은 암흑물질이 생기며 폭발은 없으나 폭발하게되면 극지방으로 빠저나간다 그리고 달과 화성에 운석의 충돌 흔적이 많은 것을 보면 자기장의 차이이며 제 역할을 할때는 운석을 밀어내나 역전현상이 생기면 충돌로 이어진다 공룡의 멸종을 부른 운석의 충돌은 자기장이 자전축의 변화로 일어나고 동식물의 진화에서 동물의 진화는 난활의 시작이 진화를 보여준다 동물극과 식물극의 차이로 동물의 진화는 결정된다 공룡의 알은 노출된 것으로 나와 있으며 그러면 털이 있어야 부화를 할수있으나 복원된 공룡이 털이 있는 종류는 하나도 없다 인류의 진화는 유인원에서 시작된 것이 아니라 인 류라는 고유의 종에서 시작된 것이다 유태반류의 높은 지능을 가진것은 유태반류의 특징이며 지구상의 최고의 포식자로 자리매김한 예를 보여준다 인류의 영양상태가 좋아진시기는 녹색 혁명을 맞이 하면서 영양상태가 좋아진 것이다 그리고 식인풍습 근친혼은 근대에도 행해졌으며 이러한 결과는 유전병을 달고 살았으며 유골로만 판단하는 것은 오류다 흰머리 스트레스 멜라닌 과산화 수소 이것은 흰머리가 나는 주요 원인이다 그러나 이것은 면역과 효소에 의한 것이며 그러나 인간의 의학은 원인만 알지 과정과 결과는 모른다 면역과 효소가 어떻게 일어나는지 서술하지 못한다 스트레스도 쥐를 통해서 가스와 전기자극으로 스트레스를 주면 모든 자손들은 유전된다 식물이 광합성을 하면 영양분이 대부분 토양에 뿌려진다 뿌리의 ARF7 물질을 제거하면 수분을 감지하지 못한다 이것은 화학 반응과 화학물질의 작용이다 이것도 설명하지 못한다 동식물은 꼬리없는 정자와 꼬리있는 정자로 수정을 하며 어류는 부유성 어류는 성전환을 하며 저서성 어류는 난활때 성이 정해진다 성이 정해질수 빡에 없는 이유가 있다 그러나 답은 서술하지 못한다 양자 역학의 스핀은 전자기파에 의해서 영향을 받으며 중첩과 얽힘에서 얽힘은 반물질이며 전하를 계산할수 있다 입자성과 파동성을 동시에 볼수있는 것이 핵연료 수조의 제어봉의 푸른빛이 나는 현상이다 서양의 불확정성의 원리와 같은 서양의 보이지 않는 미적분의 양자 역학이 아니라 동양의 동양 철학의 무극이 태극이요 태극이 무극이요 란 팔괘에서 시작 되면서 보이는 양자역학 미시적인 양자역학 거시적인 원자 자기력을 보여준다 양자 컴퓨터는 원소와 원리를 알아야 할것이다 일반 컴퓨터도 양자 컴퓨터의 효과를 낼수있다 이것뿐만 아니라 인간이 만든 최고의 폭발물은 원폭이다 과거의 원폭은 우랴늄이 주원료로 사용된 것이라면 현대는 기폭제만 우랴늄이고 주원료는 수소다 이것은 우랴늄 기체 폭탄에는 수류탄 급이다 아르곤 가스가 우랴늄 기체다 여기에 두 종류의 기체를 첨가하면 독특한 반응을 보이는데 수소가 소진할때까지 반응한다 그러나 기체와 반응은 서술하지 않는다 초전도체라는 이론이 나온지 백년이 넘어도 물리적특성도 개념도 모른다 오비탈이 0이고 전기저항이 0이다 이를 수용하는 물질이 우랴늄염이 있다 프라즈마 초전도체 우랴늄염 지구의 내핵 용암 자기장이 같은 현상이다 이 현상은 모든 결합과 반응을 통칭한다 그러나 설명하지 않는다 한 나라의 국방은 항공모함에 달려있다 이 항공모함의 제일 큰 비중은 캐타펄트이며 수증기식이나 전자식이나 문제가 많다 제일 적은 비용으로 할수있는 방법이 폭약식과 유압식이다 그리고 인간의 통증을 다스리는 봉독이 중합 효소인 까닭과 결합과 성분이 병에 작용하는 원리는 무엇일까 이 같은 내용을 몰래카메라로 KBS 인간 극장 촬영으로 얼마나 남의 손에 들어 갔는지 모른다

Particles are objects that emerge from wave properties, so a better question would be Is dark matter backed upon waves of certain fields.

Short answer, no. Typical science communicators use "dark matter" to represent a misunderstanding of gravity at low acceleration as particles. But it's not.