What is a Fourier Series? (Explained by drawing circles) - Smarter Every Day 205

What is a Fourier Series? (Explained by drawing circles) - Smarter Every Day 205

SmarterEveryDay

5 лет назад

3,620,130 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

Ben Schofield
Ben Schofield - 10.12.2018 22:22

Holy cow, Destin how are you today?

Ответить
Leonardo Chhabra
Leonardo Chhabra - 30.10.2023 15:26

blue brown already explained this long before this video

Ответить
Nader Ramadan
Nader Ramadan - 30.10.2023 07:46

Paint the Mona Lisa using the Fourier series ;)

Ответить
Phantomatic Science
Phantomatic Science - 22.10.2023 00:01

Really cool what we can do with fourier :) this is one of the most beautiful structures in science.. thanks for show us different point of view :)

Ответить
Prince Kumar
Prince Kumar - 10.10.2023 00:39

Visualization should be made compulsory before making the undergrads into Maths

Ответить
William Ashley
William Ashley - 04.10.2023 06:01

uhm so wouldn't that challenge be pretty easy if it was just recursivelydone? That is taking the lines of the image and then simply recursively assigning the mathematical functions?

Ответить
Scot Rasor
Scot Rasor - 30.09.2023 18:35

I sat GIF not Jiff like the peanut butter

Ответить
Ross Friedman
Ross Friedman - 14.09.2023 10:49

Is this like when an electron's linear and angular momentum add up?

Ответить
John Wilson
John Wilson - 12.09.2023 12:10

I'm from the UK - and I've said 'GIF' (not JIF) for 40 plus years. No one has ever corrected me!

Ответить
Chris Dennis
Chris Dennis - 08.09.2023 18:56

Anytime I'm on a boat I take a picture of the water and Fourier transform it. Fourier transform everything!

Ответить
Burntsider
Burntsider - 04.09.2023 22:14

Did you really open an academic explanation with "wuddup?"

Ответить
pezboy715
pezboy715 - 15.08.2023 01:00

Just like how he said in the video, “GIF” is pronounced “GIF” and NOT like “GIF”. Argument over.

Ответить
E lumine
E lumine - 08.08.2023 20:35

Fourier mathematics LITERALLY is how the mind (all minds in existence) defined as e^iπ+1=0, project physical reality and it explains how you are able to create matter in your sleep when you dream alone.

Ответить
E lumine
E lumine - 08.08.2023 20:30

-Step One: Nothingness
Our first task is to rationally define “nothing at all”. Only then can we start
to define what “something” is.
“Nothing at all” has no properties of any kind. It has no mass, energy,
speed, extension, dimensionality, location density, weight, colour, smell,
taste, sound, appearance, qualia, consciousness, unconsciousness, or
anything else. Is there anything helpful we can utilise that meets this
definition? There’s only one possible answer: the static mathematical point.
This is “nothing”, “zero”, void, blankness, emptiness. It is nothing and it
does nothing. It has no effects, no consequences. It’s as if it’s not there at
all, and indeed, it isn’t there at all. This is pure zero, abstract zero, unreal
zero, non-ontological zero.
If we can have one nothingness, i.e. one mathematical point, we can have
an infinite number. Nothing can prevent nothing. Where one static point is
possible, infinite static points are possible. But all we are doing is
multiplying nothing. We are merely creating infinite nothingness.
This is the ground state of “reality”. Anyone who wants to explain the
reality we observe must explain why there is more than just this infinite
nothingness. What sufficient reason is there for more than simple nothing?
Leibniz famously asked why there is something rather than nothing.
Mathematically, this equates to asking what could be legitimately, rationally
added to nothing at all, without violating the principle of sufficient reason,
i.e. without creating an arbitrary add on to nothing that we could never
justify.
If nothing is the ground state of reality then anything we add to nothing
cannot violate this ground state, i.e. whatever we add must itself be some
version of nothing at all, while of course not being nothing at all (because
then we could never have “something”)

-Only one thing can be added to static points without defying the principle
of sufficient reason. That thing is motion. If “nothing” = non-existence =
static mathematical points, then “something” = existence = moving
mathematical points. Existence, in other words, is rational, mathematical
motion (🜀).
But why should a mathematical point move? The answer, naturally, is the
principle of sufficient reason itself. If it is possible for a point to move, and
there is no sufficient reason for it not to move, then it must move. The only
thing that would stop a point from moving is if it violated the zero ground
state of the universe.
The principle of sufficient reason does not allow any particular state to be
arbitrarily privileged over any other state that satisfies exactly the same
conditions. Thus, there is no sufficient reason for a static universe of
absolute nothingness if a dynamic universe of somethingness can just as
readily satisfy exactly the same requirement for the universe never to
exceed a ground state energy of precisely zero forever.
There is nothing special about absolute nothingness. It is no more
fundamental than any other state that necessarily obeys the compulsory
ground state energy of zero of the universe.
Every state that satisfies the ground state energy of the universe will and
must exist since there is nothing to prevent it. Moreover it will exist
necessarily and eternally. Every such state is part of the permanent fibre and
fabric of existence. This is the framework of the universe, the inherent
superstructure and substructure. Everything hangs on this. It fills up
existence. There are no gaps at all.
In Leibniz’s system, true substances were “metaphysical” points which,
so Leibniz said, were both real and exact, while physical points were real
but not exact, and mathematical points were exact but not real.
In modern ontological mathematics, static mathematical points are exact
but unreal, while moving mathematical points serve as the basis for both
metaphysical points (concerned with minds) and physical points (concerned
with matter).
===
Ontological Mathematics: How to create the universe. By Mike Hockney.

Ответить
Bastian Wiesner
Bastian Wiesner - 23.07.2023 18:42

Great vid but Thais visualisation is Stolen Form 3Blue1Brown

Ответить
Loan Phạm
Loan Phạm - 20.07.2023 19:42

wow !!! marvelous

Ответить
pulkit yogi
pulkit yogi - 24.06.2023 17:22

Tum mera itna prachar mat karo pls my humble request to you

Ответить
ANIL
ANIL - 19.06.2023 12:07

afferim lan. gurur duyulası.

Ответить
Gui
Gui - 18.06.2023 05:12

Finally
The video that helps me understand the explanation given by 3Blue1Brown 😂

Ответить
Houndz
Houndz - 28.05.2023 12:12

I learnt Fourier series in 1st semester of my engineering it’s my 2nd semester now and now I finally understand why we did Fourier series.

Ответить
danimal1802
danimal1802 - 22.05.2023 08:35

Love this ... just finished a master's degree and had some of this math in a "controls course" ... this is your best video ever. greetings from Switzerland. Hats off to Doga and your video channel. Daniel

Ответить
End One
End One - 10.05.2023 05:42

thats hax gimme hacx

Ответить
bitty bit
bitty bit - 04.05.2023 00:05

This is really awesome!!!

Ответить
Liam Thompson
Liam Thompson - 01.05.2023 17:09

Well done, both of you.

Ответить
Chulalak(มด)
Chulalak(มด) - 30.04.2023 06:19

what it sound like

Ответить
Julio Demedeiros
Julio Demedeiros - 20.04.2023 04:26

that is nice

Ответить
Die Nosor
Die Nosor - 16.04.2023 21:56

Wow, that flip books is creative next level.
You were the first one to come with the idea of geogebra haha

Ответить
Dao The Thing
Dao The Thing - 13.04.2023 21:31

hard G on Gif, i assume he was trolling tho.

Ответить
Trippy Trolls
Trippy Trolls - 09.04.2023 23:02

Jif is peanut butter

Ответить
Anumaya Verma
Anumaya Verma - 08.04.2023 19:51

wiper play important role in making different unique waves in electronics
and communication

Ответить
M
M - 29.03.2023 00:05

THE FACE HE MADE when you quoted Steve Wilhite's "it's pronounced Jif" hahahahahaa

Ответить
David Michaels
David Michaels - 28.03.2023 02:05

In digital signal processing you can add them up in ONE clock cycle.

Ответить
Blind Camel
Blind Camel - 10.03.2023 03:49

Probably a really dumb question, so if it's just 'wipers' attached to 'wipers' in a circular motion why do the wipers create a square wave in the 1st illustration and a saw tooth on the 2nd illustration? anybody that can explain please?

Ответить
TheKrell
TheKrell - 09.03.2023 01:59

Pendulums are not sinusoidal motion. They deviate more and more as the amplitude increases.

Ответить
Graham Savell
Graham Savell - 06.03.2023 20:23

soo... we are just functions of functions of circles or rotations of particle waves

Ответить
Diego Santos
Diego Santos - 02.03.2023 06:34

Impressing my lawyer girlfriend spitting out the forrier series

Ответить
Andrew Davis
Andrew Davis - 01.03.2023 08:20

Seeing the circles makes the logo reminded me of the cogs of an automaton for the victorian era!

Ответить
daris taufiq
daris taufiq - 26.02.2023 12:24

Idk how accurate it is but someone made a cover of a video music using fourier series.. its bad apple

Ответить
Bleeble Vosotros
Bleeble Vosotros - 22.02.2023 00:16

protein folding

Ответить
Jackson LeBaron
Jackson LeBaron - 16.02.2023 10:41

It's pronounced GIF!!

Ответить
吴-仔佳
吴-仔佳 - 14.02.2023 16:02

Great !

Ответить
Gregg Rco
Gregg Rco - 30.01.2023 05:24

Apply this to Quantum Gravity.

Ответить
Gregg Rco
Gregg Rco - 30.01.2023 05:23

Dude Dude Dude !!!!!!!!!!!!! That is great !!!!!!

BTW: gif with a G ! LOL !

Ответить
Dennis Hollingsworth
Dennis Hollingsworth - 29.01.2023 18:28

What breaks my brain is how to derive those four functions!

Ответить