No Man's Sky – PC Low vs. Medium vs. Ultra Graphics Comparison 1440p

madden 17 360vsOne

Thanks for this comparison. I was trying to wonder why my GTX 1060 will fall below 30 on such a simple game when it can play witcher 3 at ultra hair works and everything with way better fps. I guess its just a broken game

really bad game :(

what's the point of comparing the graphics? tje game is ugly asf

Там же графена нихуя нет, почему такая оптимизация?

wth! My game set to ultra 1080 res looks like 720 soup... seriously wish my game looked like this.

All look like shit Ultra is just a slightly polished shit.

The lighting is horrible in this game, especially in indoor places. It would go down to single digits when I was in a tiny room with just an alien. Pretty terrible optimization and game engine. It should have looked like the concept art. Instead the shadows are just weird and the colors are over saturated.

Man erkennt einfach gaar keinen Unterschied 😂

No man's Lie

Every man's refund

Please compare the current game with E3 footage and the one they were playing in interviews.

I can clearly see the difference. Framerate. I think the only actual difference is the LOD. But its not worth the performance sacrifice

is htere no high settings?

fps!what does it mean?

Shit, shit and shit.

this game should cost 5 or 10 euro instead of 60

One word ... WTF !!!!

hässliches spiel

How can ultra still manage to look like shit?

Not trolling, love the video comparisons, but the game is boring as ** no matter what graphical setting. Amazed at attention this game continues to receive. One day it will hopefully fade into obscurity (or show up as pay what you want on a Humble Bundle deal). I tried on PS4, had zero bugs/crashes and graphics were good for most part. But the game itself. . .I tried to like as best I could, but just couldn't.

only notable differences are in textures and shadows, reflections don't look much different, maybe slight better fog resolution? shader, polycount all the same, distance view probably don't change much either, even on low settings you can see the same amount of detail in distance. more "everything" popping on low also.

the only thing that changes is the AA

What an ugly ass game..

Sean Murray, eat some horse shit please.

ni se nota la diferencia

worst graphic game ever

The worst optimization happened in Sean Murray by his parents. Seriously now, he should have become a liar instead. Umm, i meant lawyer...

no crash? no man's sky. ;-)

no mans sky is the best game of the year, sorry i mean best SCAM of the year. runs and looks like shit but even worse is its inexistent gameplay.

That FPS on ultra tho xD I'm completely maxing it out at 60-100fps easily.

Game is shit, regardless of the graphics

i question there minnium settinds i have a Phenom IIx4 with 8GB ram but im useing a radeon 5870 set to low and medium i still get 30-40 fps seems to run good 90 percent of the time. new graphics card is a bit pricey

I guess this is the worst game ever

why didn't you compare medium to high then high to ultra?

No Optimization´s Sky

There's like no difference!! Lol like very very minimal difference... no point...

why is there such a huge fps gap between mid and Ultra, Looks like the same to me.

Kaum bis gar kein Unterschied

Wow! I cant wait to get my £2000+ PC so I can take a nostalgic trip down PlayStation 2 graphics!

I understand why you can't see the difference. Your graphics card is a 900 series.
I used to run NMS on an 800 series and when I upgraded to a GTX 1060, I now the a massive difference in ultra settings. Also my fps is at a healthy 45-60 throughout. Not looking as plain as your ultra settings.

So medium is without a doubt the best. Massive performance increase from high/ultra with minimal loss in visual quality.

Even my Vega 64 that I undervolted and played around with for stability likes to stutter on high settings.

i barely spot anything except the shadows being clearer

My low settings looks worse than this...

thank you now i can buy the game because i konow that is is very good on medium

Low is the same as Ultra? In that case, it CAN look good on my crap computer :)

This is one of those games which due to design limitations doesn’t look significantly better at ultra settings. I would pick frame rate over visual, if my computer were able to do 60 frames. At least it’s more enjoyable visually and feels more fun.

Very Informative

Its no difference maybe