Комментарии:
Please say NASA CORRECTLY !!! AI sounds horrible.
ОтветитьYour channel would be much better if you use a real human voice rather than the stupid AI!
ОтветитьSpelling counts. I didn’t even bother.
ОтветитьIt's not Delta 5 it's Delta V (For velocity!)
ОтветитьIf they get to it the Falcon Heavy is going to be a beast...
ОтветитьReusability is what makes SpaceX above the rest.
ОтветитьTotally reusable Falcon Heavy will become reality very soon.
ОтветитьNothing new here. If want max payload, have to be willing to expend boosters.
All three boosters have been recovered previously
AI generated daily churn, with favourable bot generated comments thrown in
And there’s a market for this
what if an additional 2 boosters were attached to the center booster. Then the center booster would have enough fuel to land
ОтветитьLook just add a tugg to the center stage rocket so you can bring it back da
ОтветитьCorrection, it's impossible to embarrassed a retired, old Politicians that has gladhand his political career all his life.
ОтветитьSpacex has already landed all 3 boosters a couple years ago
ОтветитьWhat's really embarrassing for NASA is hooking up with Boeing. Looser
ОтветитьWonder why they haven’t changed to methane and the rapter engines with their higher thrust to put bigger and heavier loads into orbit?
ОтветитьJust extend the second stage to carry more fuel and the center booster won't have to push so far...easy fix
ОтветитьDecent synopsis. Thanks
ОтветитьLooks like Flash Gordon movies !!
ОтветитьTeach ur AI how to pronounce MPH...Delta Vee... etc.
Ответитьnasa was authorized to spend that much ? Maybe cuba is chipping in ..........
ОтветитьWhy is it so difficult for some companies to NOT learn from their mistakes? SpaceX accepts the challenge and keeps stepping up to the plate for more. I love the philosophy and dedication to this great group. Please keep doing what you do so well!!!
ОтветитьSo what the backup? I think they can us an AI to determine the trajectory is off to use a parachute.
ОтветитьThis is nothing new.
Ответить🇱🇾🇸🇳🇹🇲🇱🇸🇰🇮🇲🇱🇱🇨🇮🇷🇱🇦🇹🇴🇲🇬🇮🇪🇮🇹🇹🇬🇱🇸🇸🇳🇹🇲🇧🇷
ОтветитьYawn. Talk about it WHEN it happens.
ОтветитьWhat is a “Nawsa”?
ОтветитьIt is all about "TOTAL LOAD" CAPACITY. Both the "Payload" and the "Fuel" being part of that "TOTAL LOAD". It is simple math, a lighter payload and more fuel can be carried. If there is sufficient fuel in the center rocket, then it can be slowed down from about MACH 10 to a reasonable dense atmosphere reentry speed. And then still have enough on board fuel for a soft landing.
ОтветитьLove that robot voiceover…naww not really….kind of sucks…a lot. 😮
ОтветитьThis is an ai bot channel. There are too many errors in the ai speech. That center stage sure added a lot of Delta 5.😂
ОтветитьOk so when or Why does SpaceX not use 4 boosters and a center stage, the lift capability of a configuration like that would be tremendous. not to mention just amazing.
ОтветитьNASA lags because it sucks on the taxpayers’ teat. SpaceX is driven to innovate by market pressure.
ОтветитьI'm not holding out hope for NASA's future, as long as they suffer from Boeing blindness, they're inadvertently suppressing innovation. Give SpaceX Boeing's budget and turn them loose.
ОтветитьFalcon Heavy should be the SLS for NASA Artemis Mission.
Ответить