RAW vs LOG | What's the Difference?! | C200 RAW Lite & C-LOG 3

What Tutorials do you want to see from Zach?

You Said: when Shooting Log you have 2 stops of Dynamic range, when Shooting RAW you have 12." ...are you serious???

"we are film" no you aint

Why do you see results immediately with log as opposed to raw when it comes to applying by a lut?

ok I learned that if you dont know what the heck you are doing with your camera then RAW will help you recover and compensate the lack of skill? :) Also watched you guys in 4K, you are constantly blurry/out of focus. Have you not noticed? Also I suggest to normalize audio of your intro vs actual video, so viewers dont have to change their volume because you assembled your video this way. I am a bit surprised that you guys actually teach others in this topic

Thanks, I did think they were the same thing, because I never had a camera that had either Log or RAW videos

The jingle kills my ears

This is a poor explanation. RAW isn't like this at all. It is just a larger data container to capture a wider ranger of HSL, which a standard 8 bit JPG cannot contain, The 32bit RAW clips on an 8 bit monitor and can be pushed either way to recover. If you shot at ISO 800, you cannot simply change it to ISO 100 and bring out the detail if you shot at ISO 100. If you shot at a certain white balance, you can mess around with the data to recover it, but it has limits depending on the software. The way you explain it, you could take a picture at 102,000 ISO and later on push it down to ISO100. This is not how it works, otherwise there would be no need to worry about any camera settings ever and just leave it in full auto.

Nice demo guys it's for sure difficulte to manage the contrast when you shoot under trees with a very bright sun, or even on a church with light candle, most analog camera or LOG profile fail on that kind of setup, plus RAW profile is more linear and able to work with HDRI still picture like open EXR or HDR, it's make compositing with CGI even more easy, especialy with an ACES color management profile.

thumbs up because of the intro lmao!!!!

I have a question. I´m new in this raw thing. So when I record a video and balance all lights and shadows according to what I see in the field monitor and then I load the raw footage in the computer, everything looks different and I have to balance whites again, correct exposure, etc It's feels like doing the job again. Please enlighten me, what should I do?

You cannot change ISO in RAW video LOL, the ISO is how sensitive the sensor is to light, you can however recover a great deal of details in shadows and highlights in RAW video.
In fact I am surprised you just did not say, RAW video is just like RAW photo, principle is the same except RAW video is continous stream of images, if you shot RAW video at 24fps you end up with 24 frames per second of what you shot in your folder + an audio clip.
Some RAW cameras combined these into just one big file but in essence the principle is the same.
With RAW-video you can do just as much to the image as you can with RAW photos.

Wanted to understand RAW more better. If I shot in a very high dynamic range situation where keeping it in ISO 800 is the right exposure for the shadows and ISO 100, or whatever's the least, for the highlights. I would like to set the ISO as 800 in the RAW settings in post. Will my highlight recovery be possible? If so, then how?
PS. Sorry for this question, even though the video was thorough.

I finally get it! Thank-you!

I have a canon that can shoot raw and clog and clog 3. If I shoot raw, does it matter which log profile I choose? I mean I can change it in post right? So it doesn’t matter?

I shot a hyperlapse with a DJI Air 2 rotating into a sunrise, it was beautiful but for having to change my shutter speed to bring down the exposure mid video. I'm new at this so not sure how I correct this. Any suggestions?

Great intro dood

Holy shit, 60s to get to the information.

RAW does not have more DR!

Amazing video and explanation! Thank you very much

So which is better Log or Raw for video shoot profile ?

From what I understand RAW is not actually changing the ISO in post it’s just adding and removing gain. There is a misconception that it is a voodoo codec that can magically change these things. If you mess up white balance in camera with RAW your image will still look as mediocre if had been shot in LOG

Digital artifacts in LOG and RAW are a byproduct of a poor processing engine (slow data bit rate) that can't produce a steady data-stream.

Incorrect or a slow data-stream bit-rate will cause artifacts.

Amazing explanation. Precise and Informative.

Very informative, thanks!

Quick Question:
When grading Raw, how is that done? I always see log footage where they drop a LUT on the footage and tweek afterwards. Is it the same process with raw?

Really great start for you guys, love the production quality. Looking forward to seeing you grow.

More, please!!!)))) nice job!

Q: How can you change ISO in RAW after to fact, when it has something to do about electric gain on the video sensor to make it more light sensitive . If you change ISO from like ISO200 to ISO25400, does the picture get any brighter and with more grain? Because the T-stop (Aperture) does not change, that is fixed by the lens. Can anyone explain that to me??? Or is it just like exposure when you are working with Photo RAWs?

Hello there! When did you rebrand the channel?

Wow that second host really seems to have a talent for talking! Lol

That BRAW though, such a game changer